Limits...
Isokinetic Dynamometry and 1RM Tests Produce Conflicting Results for Assessing Alterations in Muscle Strength

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare strength gains in the lower limbs, assessed by one maximum repetition (1RM) and isokinetic peak torque (PT), in young men undergoing a resistance training (RT) program. Twenty-seven young men performed resistance training twice a week for 11 weeks. Training involved two exercises for the lower body, two for the upper body and one for the midsection performed with three sets of 8-12 repetitions to momentary muscle failure. Before and after the training period, participants performed the 1RM test in the 45° leg press and knee extension PT in isokinetic dynamometry. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the changes in 1RM and PT, and the Bland-Altman test was performed to check for agreement between the strength changes of both tests. There were significant changes in 1RM and PT of 23.98% and 15.96%, respectively (p < 0.05). The changes in leg press 1RM were significantly higher than the ones in PT. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the tests were not equivalent. In conclusion, professionals and researchers involved in strength assessment should be aware that the results obtained by PT and 1RM are not equivalent when evaluating individual responsiveness and/or the efficacy of an intervention on muscle strength, as the results obtained show large variations and can be even conflicting.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Correlation between strength gains measured by 45° leg press 1RM and knee extensors isokinetic peak torque
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC5384049&req=5

j_hukin-2017-0019_fig_002: Correlation between strength gains measured by 45° leg press 1RM and knee extensors isokinetic peak torque

Mentions: There was a moderate correlation between baseline PT and leg press 1RM (r = 0.6; p < 0.01), but the results of Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the measures were not equivalent. The correlation between increases in PT and 1RM were also moderate (r = 0.49; p < 0.01; Figure 2); however, the results of the Bland-Altman tests revealed that the strength gains measured with the two tests were different from each other (Figure 3). The coefficient of determination indicated that the percentage of the total variance shared by the tests was r2 = 0.24 (p < 0.05).


Isokinetic Dynamometry and 1RM Tests Produce Conflicting Results for Assessing Alterations in Muscle Strength
Correlation between strength gains measured by 45° leg press 1RM and knee extensors isokinetic peak torque
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC5384049&req=5

j_hukin-2017-0019_fig_002: Correlation between strength gains measured by 45° leg press 1RM and knee extensors isokinetic peak torque
Mentions: There was a moderate correlation between baseline PT and leg press 1RM (r = 0.6; p < 0.01), but the results of Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the measures were not equivalent. The correlation between increases in PT and 1RM were also moderate (r = 0.49; p < 0.01; Figure 2); however, the results of the Bland-Altman tests revealed that the strength gains measured with the two tests were different from each other (Figure 3). The coefficient of determination indicated that the percentage of the total variance shared by the tests was r2 = 0.24 (p < 0.05).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare strength gains in the lower limbs, assessed by one maximum repetition (1RM) and isokinetic peak torque (PT), in young men undergoing a resistance training (RT) program. Twenty-seven young men performed resistance training twice a week for 11 weeks. Training involved two exercises for the lower body, two for the upper body and one for the midsection performed with three sets of 8-12 repetitions to momentary muscle failure. Before and after the training period, participants performed the 1RM test in the 45&deg; leg press and knee extension PT in isokinetic dynamometry. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the changes in 1RM and PT, and the Bland-Altman test was performed to check for agreement between the strength changes of both tests. There were significant changes in 1RM and PT of 23.98% and 15.96%, respectively (p &lt; 0.05). The changes in leg press 1RM were significantly higher than the ones in PT. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the tests were not equivalent. In conclusion, professionals and researchers involved in strength assessment should be aware that the results obtained by PT and 1RM are not equivalent when evaluating individual responsiveness and/or the efficacy of an intervention on muscle strength, as the results obtained show large variations and can be even conflicting.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus