Limits...
Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Planktonic and Biofilm Cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance profile of planktonic and biofilm cells of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Two hundred Staphylococcus spp. strains were studied, including 50 S. aureus and 150 CoNS strains (50 S. epidermidis, 20 S. haemolyticus, 20 S. warneri, 20 S. hominis, 20 S. lugdunensis, and 20 S. saprophyticus). Biofilm formation was investigated by adherence to polystyrene plates. Positive strains were submitted to the broth microdilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for planktonic and biofilm cells and the minimal bactericidal concentration for biofilm cells (MBCB). Forty-nine Staphylococcus spp. strains (14 S. aureus, 13 S. epidermidis, 13 S. saprophyticus, 3 S. haemolyticus, 1 S. hominis, 3 S. warneri, and 2 S. lugdunensis) were biofilm producers. These isolates were evaluated regarding their resistance profile. Determination of planktonic cell MIC identified three (21.4%) S. aureus strains that were resistant to oxacillin and six (42.8%) that were resistant to erythromycin. Among the CoNS, 31 (88.6%) strains were resistant to oxacillin, 14 (40%) to erythromycin, 18 (51.4%) to gentamicin, and 8 (22.8%) to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. None of the planktonic isolates were resistant to vancomycin or linezolid. MICs were 2-, 4-, 8-, and up to 16-fold higher for biofilm cells than for planktonic cells. This observation was more common for vancomycin and erythromycin. The MBCB ranged from 8 to >256 µg/mL for oxacillin, 128 to >128 µg/mL for vancomycin, 256 to >256 µg/mL for erythromycin and gentamicin, >64 µg/mL for linezolid, and 32/608 to >32/608 µg/mL for sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. The results showed considerably higher MICs for S. aureus and CoNS biofilm cells compared to planktonic cells. Analysis of MBCM confirmed that even high concentrations of vancomycin were unable to eliminate the biofilms of S. aureus and CoNS species. Linezolid was the most effective drug in inhibiting staphylococci in the biofilm, without an increase in the MIC, when compared to planktonic cells. None of the isolates were resistant to this drug.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Polystyrene plate adherence test. A, B, C, and D represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 1, 2, 7, and 9 (weakly adherent); 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 (non-adherent), and 12 (strongly adherent). Rows E, F, G, and H represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 13 (S. epidermidis ATCC 35983—positive control), 14 (S. epidermidis ATCC 12228—negative control), and 15–22 (sterile Trypticase Soy Broth—TSB).
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC5037702&req=5

ijms-17-01423-f001: Polystyrene plate adherence test. A, B, C, and D represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 1, 2, 7, and 9 (weakly adherent); 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 (non-adherent), and 12 (strongly adherent). Rows E, F, G, and H represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 13 (S. epidermidis ATCC 35983—positive control), 14 (S. epidermidis ATCC 12228—negative control), and 15–22 (sterile Trypticase Soy Broth—TSB).

Mentions: Analysis of the plates using a 540 nm filter (Figure 1) classified 41 (20.5%) of the 200 isolates as weakly adherent and 8 (4%) as strongly adherent, corresponding to 49 (24.5%) positive isolates and 151 (75.5%) negative non-adherent strains (Table 1).


Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Planktonic and Biofilm Cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Polystyrene plate adherence test. A, B, C, and D represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 1, 2, 7, and 9 (weakly adherent); 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 (non-adherent), and 12 (strongly adherent). Rows E, F, G, and H represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 13 (S. epidermidis ATCC 35983—positive control), 14 (S. epidermidis ATCC 12228—negative control), and 15–22 (sterile Trypticase Soy Broth—TSB).
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC5037702&req=5

ijms-17-01423-f001: Polystyrene plate adherence test. A, B, C, and D represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 1, 2, 7, and 9 (weakly adherent); 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 (non-adherent), and 12 (strongly adherent). Rows E, F, G, and H represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 13 (S. epidermidis ATCC 35983—positive control), 14 (S. epidermidis ATCC 12228—negative control), and 15–22 (sterile Trypticase Soy Broth—TSB).
Mentions: Analysis of the plates using a 540 nm filter (Figure 1) classified 41 (20.5%) of the 200 isolates as weakly adherent and 8 (4%) as strongly adherent, corresponding to 49 (24.5%) positive isolates and 151 (75.5%) negative non-adherent strains (Table 1).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance profile of planktonic and biofilm cells of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Two hundred Staphylococcus spp. strains were studied, including 50 S. aureus and 150 CoNS strains (50 S. epidermidis, 20 S. haemolyticus, 20 S. warneri, 20 S. hominis, 20 S. lugdunensis, and 20 S. saprophyticus). Biofilm formation was investigated by adherence to polystyrene plates. Positive strains were submitted to the broth microdilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for planktonic and biofilm cells and the minimal bactericidal concentration for biofilm cells (MBCB). Forty-nine Staphylococcus spp. strains (14 S. aureus, 13 S. epidermidis, 13 S. saprophyticus, 3 S. haemolyticus, 1 S. hominis, 3 S. warneri, and 2 S. lugdunensis) were biofilm producers. These isolates were evaluated regarding their resistance profile. Determination of planktonic cell MIC identified three (21.4%) S. aureus strains that were resistant to oxacillin and six (42.8%) that were resistant to erythromycin. Among the CoNS, 31 (88.6%) strains were resistant to oxacillin, 14 (40%) to erythromycin, 18 (51.4%) to gentamicin, and 8 (22.8%) to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. None of the planktonic isolates were resistant to vancomycin or linezolid. MICs were 2-, 4-, 8-, and up to 16-fold higher for biofilm cells than for planktonic cells. This observation was more common for vancomycin and erythromycin. The MBCB ranged from 8 to >256 µg/mL for oxacillin, 128 to >128 µg/mL for vancomycin, 256 to >256 µg/mL for erythromycin and gentamicin, >64 µg/mL for linezolid, and 32/608 to >32/608 µg/mL for sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. The results showed considerably higher MICs for S. aureus and CoNS biofilm cells compared to planktonic cells. Analysis of MBCM confirmed that even high concentrations of vancomycin were unable to eliminate the biofilms of S. aureus and CoNS species. Linezolid was the most effective drug in inhibiting staphylococci in the biofilm, without an increase in the MIC, when compared to planktonic cells. None of the isolates were resistant to this drug.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus