Limits...
An indirect comparison of infliximab versus adalimumab or golimumab for active ulcerative colitis

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare adalimumab or golimumab with infliximab in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Material and methods: This paper was prepared according to the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. No direct head-to-head comparisons for infliximab vs. adalimumab or golimumab were available so an indirect comparison according to the Bucher method was performed after a homogeneity evaluation of the included studies.

Results: Six RCTs were included in the systematic review. An indirect comparison was performed, which revealed that infliximab was more effective in inducing clinical response compared with both doses of adalimumab (160/80 mg or 80/40 mg; p < 0.05), and, in clinical remission, infliximab was more effective than adalimumab (only for a dosage regime of 80/40 mg; p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in clinical response and clinical remission were observed between infliximab and golimumab in the induction phase. A significant (p < 0.05) advantage only of infliximab compared with adalimumab at doses of 80/40 mg and 80/160 mg was seen in terms of clinical response in the maintenance phase (up to 52–54 weeks). The indirect comparison revealed that serious adverse events were significantly more frequent among patients treated with a maintenance dose of 100 mg of golimumab compared with those treated with infliximab (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: No significant differences in efficacy in the maintenance phase between infliximab and golimumab or adalimumab were revealed. Infliximab proved to be more effective than adalimumab but of similar efficacy to that of golimumab in the induction phase.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Forest plot of direct estimates for: A – infliximab (5 mg) vs. placebo and adalimumab (160/80 mg) vs. placebo, and indirect comparison between treatments in the case of serious adverse events after 52–54 weeks of drug administration; B – infliximab (5 mg) vs. placebo and golimumab (100 mg) vs. placebo, and indirect comparison between treatments in the case of serious adverse events after 52–54 weeks of drug administration
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC5016577&req=5

Figure 0004: Forest plot of direct estimates for: A – infliximab (5 mg) vs. placebo and adalimumab (160/80 mg) vs. placebo, and indirect comparison between treatments in the case of serious adverse events after 52–54 weeks of drug administration; B – infliximab (5 mg) vs. placebo and golimumab (100 mg) vs. placebo, and indirect comparison between treatments in the case of serious adverse events after 52–54 weeks of drug administration

Mentions: The indirect comparison showed that there is no difference in the frequency of overall adverse events among patients treated with infliximab [37, 38] in comparison with those treated with adalimumab [32, 39–41] or golimumab [43] (Figure 4; Table V). In the case of patients treated with a maintenance golimumab dose of 100 mg [43], serious adverse events were significantly more frequent than in the case of patients treated with infliximab [37, 38] (Figure 4; Table V).


An indirect comparison of infliximab versus adalimumab or golimumab for active ulcerative colitis
Forest plot of direct estimates for: A – infliximab (5 mg) vs. placebo and adalimumab (160/80 mg) vs. placebo, and indirect comparison between treatments in the case of serious adverse events after 52–54 weeks of drug administration; B – infliximab (5 mg) vs. placebo and golimumab (100 mg) vs. placebo, and indirect comparison between treatments in the case of serious adverse events after 52–54 weeks of drug administration
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC5016577&req=5

Figure 0004: Forest plot of direct estimates for: A – infliximab (5 mg) vs. placebo and adalimumab (160/80 mg) vs. placebo, and indirect comparison between treatments in the case of serious adverse events after 52–54 weeks of drug administration; B – infliximab (5 mg) vs. placebo and golimumab (100 mg) vs. placebo, and indirect comparison between treatments in the case of serious adverse events after 52–54 weeks of drug administration
Mentions: The indirect comparison showed that there is no difference in the frequency of overall adverse events among patients treated with infliximab [37, 38] in comparison with those treated with adalimumab [32, 39–41] or golimumab [43] (Figure 4; Table V). In the case of patients treated with a maintenance golimumab dose of 100 mg [43], serious adverse events were significantly more frequent than in the case of patients treated with infliximab [37, 38] (Figure 4; Table V).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare adalimumab or golimumab with infliximab in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Material and methods: This paper was prepared according to the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. No direct head-to-head comparisons for infliximab vs. adalimumab or golimumab were available so an indirect comparison according to the Bucher method was performed after a homogeneity evaluation of the included studies.

Results: Six RCTs were included in the systematic review. An indirect comparison was performed, which revealed that infliximab was more effective in inducing clinical response compared with both doses of adalimumab (160/80 mg or 80/40 mg; p < 0.05), and, in clinical remission, infliximab was more effective than adalimumab (only for a dosage regime of 80/40 mg; p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in clinical response and clinical remission were observed between infliximab and golimumab in the induction phase. A significant (p < 0.05) advantage only of infliximab compared with adalimumab at doses of 80/40 mg and 80/160 mg was seen in terms of clinical response in the maintenance phase (up to 52–54 weeks). The indirect comparison revealed that serious adverse events were significantly more frequent among patients treated with a maintenance dose of 100 mg of golimumab compared with those treated with infliximab (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: No significant differences in efficacy in the maintenance phase between infliximab and golimumab or adalimumab were revealed. Infliximab proved to be more effective than adalimumab but of similar efficacy to that of golimumab in the induction phase.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus