Limits...
Lessons from Ebola: Sources of Outbreak Information and the Associated Impact on UC Irvine and Ohio University College Students

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

Objectives.: We examined the role of outbreak information sources through four domains: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and stigma related to the 2014 Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak.

Methods.: We conducted an online survey of 797 undergraduates at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) and Ohio University (OU) during the peak of the outbreak. We calculated individual scores for domains and analyzed associations to demographic variables and news sources.

Results.: Knowledge of EVD was low and misinformation was prevalent. News media (34%) and social media (19%) were the most used sources of EVD information while official government websites (OGW) were among the least used (11%). Students who acquired information through OGW had higher knowledge, more positive attitudes towards those infected, a higher belief in the government, and were less likely to stigmatize Ebola victims.

Conclusions.: Information sources are likely to influence students’ knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and stigma relating to EVD. This study contains crucial insight for those tasked with risk communication to college students. Emphasis should be given to developing effective strategies to achieve a comprehensive knowledge of EVD and future public health threats.

No MeSH data available.


© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC5016197&req=5

Mentions: When subjects were asked to rank from least to most used information source during the 2014 Ebola outbreak, or during any national emergency such as the outbreak of a certain disease, a major industrial accident or a pandemic in the U.S., survey data revealed that OGW such as the World Health Organization (WHO), National Institutes of Health (NIH), or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevent (CDC) websites, were among the least popular sources for college students (Figure 1).


Lessons from Ebola: Sources of Outbreak Information and the Associated Impact on UC Irvine and Ohio University College Students
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC5016197&req=5

Mentions: When subjects were asked to rank from least to most used information source during the 2014 Ebola outbreak, or during any national emergency such as the outbreak of a certain disease, a major industrial accident or a pandemic in the U.S., survey data revealed that OGW such as the World Health Organization (WHO), National Institutes of Health (NIH), or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevent (CDC) websites, were among the least popular sources for college students (Figure 1).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

Objectives.: We examined the role of outbreak information sources through four domains: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and stigma related to the 2014 Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak.

Methods.: We conducted an online survey of 797 undergraduates at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) and Ohio University (OU) during the peak of the outbreak. We calculated individual scores for domains and analyzed associations to demographic variables and news sources.

Results.: Knowledge of EVD was low and misinformation was prevalent. News media (34%) and social media (19%) were the most used sources of EVD information while official government websites (OGW) were among the least used (11%). Students who acquired information through OGW had higher knowledge, more positive attitudes towards those infected, a higher belief in the government, and were less likely to stigmatize Ebola victims.

Conclusions.: Information sources are likely to influence students’ knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and stigma relating to EVD. This study contains crucial insight for those tasked with risk communication to college students. Emphasis should be given to developing effective strategies to achieve a comprehensive knowledge of EVD and future public health threats.

No MeSH data available.