Limits...
Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.

Yu X, Hu G, Zhang Z, Qiu F, Shao X, Wang X, Zhan H, Chen Y, Deng Y, Huang J - BMC Cancer (2016)

Bottom Line: We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of each method of detection and compared the biological profiles of the four imaging methods.The sensitivity of BSGI was 80.35 and 82.14 % by US, 75.6 % by MMG, and 94.06 % by MRI.Furthermore, the breast cancer diagnosis specificity of BSGI was high (83.19 % vs. 77.31 % vs. 66.39 % vs. 67.69 %, respectively).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Surgical Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

ABSTRACT

Background: Diagnosing breast cancer during the early stage may be helpful for decreasing cancer-related mortality. In Western developed countries, mammographies have been the gold standard for breast cancer detection. However, Chinese women usually have denser and smaller-sized breasts compared to Caucasian women, which decreases the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. However, breast specific gamma imaging, a type of molecular functional breast imaging, has been used for the accurate diagnosis of breast cancer and is not influenced by breast density. Our objective was to analyze the breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) diagnostic value for Chinese women.

Methods: During a 2-year period, 357 women were diagnosed and treated at our oncology department and received BSGI in addition to mammography (MMG), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostic assessment. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of each method of detection and compared the biological profiles of the four imaging methods.

Results: A total of 357 women received a final surgical pathology diagnosis, with 168 malignant diseases (58.5 %) and 119 benign diseases (41.5 %). Of these, 166 underwent the four imaging tests preoperatively. The sensitivity of BSGI was 80.35 and 82.14 % by US, 75.6 % by MMG, and 94.06 % by MRI. Furthermore, the breast cancer diagnosis specificity of BSGI was high (83.19 % vs. 77.31 % vs. 66.39 % vs. 67.69 %, respectively). The BSGI diagnostic sensitivity for mammographic breast density in women was superior to mammography and more sensitive for non-luminal A subtypes (luminal A vs. non-luminal A, 68.63 % vs. 88.30 %).

Conclusions: BSGI may help improve the ability to diagnose early stage breast cancer for Chinese women, particularly for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), mammographic breast density and non-luminal A breast cancer.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Sensitivity of BSGI, US, MMG and MRI in different traits of breast cancer
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4940883&req=5

Fig3: Sensitivity of BSGI, US, MMG and MRI in different traits of breast cancer

Mentions: For premenopausal and postmenopausal women, the sensitivity of BSGI was not superior to breast US, MMG and MRI (Fig. 3a). The four breast density categories for breast composition are defined by the visually estimated content of fibroglandular dense tissue within the breasts. In the heterogeneously dense and extremely dense group, BSGI sensitivity was superior to MMG (82.35 % vs. 77.94 %; 85.45 % vs. 65.45 %, respectively) (Fig. 3c). For tumor grade and molecular subtype sensitivity analysis, the four imaging tests were not significantly different (Fig. 3b and d).Fig. 3


Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.

Yu X, Hu G, Zhang Z, Qiu F, Shao X, Wang X, Zhan H, Chen Y, Deng Y, Huang J - BMC Cancer (2016)

Sensitivity of BSGI, US, MMG and MRI in different traits of breast cancer
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4940883&req=5

Fig3: Sensitivity of BSGI, US, MMG and MRI in different traits of breast cancer
Mentions: For premenopausal and postmenopausal women, the sensitivity of BSGI was not superior to breast US, MMG and MRI (Fig. 3a). The four breast density categories for breast composition are defined by the visually estimated content of fibroglandular dense tissue within the breasts. In the heterogeneously dense and extremely dense group, BSGI sensitivity was superior to MMG (82.35 % vs. 77.94 %; 85.45 % vs. 65.45 %, respectively) (Fig. 3c). For tumor grade and molecular subtype sensitivity analysis, the four imaging tests were not significantly different (Fig. 3b and d).Fig. 3

Bottom Line: We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of each method of detection and compared the biological profiles of the four imaging methods.The sensitivity of BSGI was 80.35 and 82.14 % by US, 75.6 % by MMG, and 94.06 % by MRI.Furthermore, the breast cancer diagnosis specificity of BSGI was high (83.19 % vs. 77.31 % vs. 66.39 % vs. 67.69 %, respectively).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Surgical Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

ABSTRACT

Background: Diagnosing breast cancer during the early stage may be helpful for decreasing cancer-related mortality. In Western developed countries, mammographies have been the gold standard for breast cancer detection. However, Chinese women usually have denser and smaller-sized breasts compared to Caucasian women, which decreases the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. However, breast specific gamma imaging, a type of molecular functional breast imaging, has been used for the accurate diagnosis of breast cancer and is not influenced by breast density. Our objective was to analyze the breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) diagnostic value for Chinese women.

Methods: During a 2-year period, 357 women were diagnosed and treated at our oncology department and received BSGI in addition to mammography (MMG), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostic assessment. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of each method of detection and compared the biological profiles of the four imaging methods.

Results: A total of 357 women received a final surgical pathology diagnosis, with 168 malignant diseases (58.5 %) and 119 benign diseases (41.5 %). Of these, 166 underwent the four imaging tests preoperatively. The sensitivity of BSGI was 80.35 and 82.14 % by US, 75.6 % by MMG, and 94.06 % by MRI. Furthermore, the breast cancer diagnosis specificity of BSGI was high (83.19 % vs. 77.31 % vs. 66.39 % vs. 67.69 %, respectively). The BSGI diagnostic sensitivity for mammographic breast density in women was superior to mammography and more sensitive for non-luminal A subtypes (luminal A vs. non-luminal A, 68.63 % vs. 88.30 %).

Conclusions: BSGI may help improve the ability to diagnose early stage breast cancer for Chinese women, particularly for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), mammographic breast density and non-luminal A breast cancer.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus