Limits...
Lateralization Technique and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Transposition.

Pimentel AC, Sanches MA, Ramalho GC, Roman-Torres CV, Manzi MR, Sendyk WR - Case Rep Dent (2016)

Bottom Line: Bone resorption of the posterior mandible can result in diminished bone edge and, therefore, the installation of implants in these regions becomes a challenge, especially in the presence of the mandibular canal and its contents, the inferior alveolar nerve.The aim was to elucidate the success rate of implants in the lateralization technique and in inferior alveolar nerve transposition and to determine the most effective sensory test.We conclude that the success rate is linked to the possibility of installing implants with long bicortical anchor which favors primary stability and biomechanics.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Post Graduation, Division of Implantology, School of Dentistry, University of Santo Amaro (UNISA), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

ABSTRACT
Bone resorption of the posterior mandible can result in diminished bone edge and, therefore, the installation of implants in these regions becomes a challenge, especially in the presence of the mandibular canal and its contents, the inferior alveolar nerve. Several treatment alternatives are suggested: the use of short implants, guided bone regeneration, appositional bone grafting, distraction osteogenesis, inclined implants tangential to the mandibular canal, and the lateralization of the inferior alveolar nerve. The aim was to elucidate the success rate of implants in the lateralization technique and in inferior alveolar nerve transposition and to determine the most effective sensory test. We conclude that the success rate is linked to the possibility of installing implants with long bicortical anchor which favors primary stability and biomechanics.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Computed tomography (cone beam) of the right mandible.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4940526&req=5

fig25: Computed tomography (cone beam) of the right mandible.

Mentions: Using CT (cone beam), on the right side of the mandible, the remaining bone volume that was 4.51 mm high and 3.75 mm wide was observed in the region of tooth 45; in the region of tooth 46, it was 5.77 mm high and 2.75 mm wide; and in tooth 47, it was 4.0 mm high and 5.51 mm wide (Figure 25).


Lateralization Technique and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Transposition.

Pimentel AC, Sanches MA, Ramalho GC, Roman-Torres CV, Manzi MR, Sendyk WR - Case Rep Dent (2016)

Computed tomography (cone beam) of the right mandible.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4940526&req=5

fig25: Computed tomography (cone beam) of the right mandible.
Mentions: Using CT (cone beam), on the right side of the mandible, the remaining bone volume that was 4.51 mm high and 3.75 mm wide was observed in the region of tooth 45; in the region of tooth 46, it was 5.77 mm high and 2.75 mm wide; and in tooth 47, it was 4.0 mm high and 5.51 mm wide (Figure 25).

Bottom Line: Bone resorption of the posterior mandible can result in diminished bone edge and, therefore, the installation of implants in these regions becomes a challenge, especially in the presence of the mandibular canal and its contents, the inferior alveolar nerve.The aim was to elucidate the success rate of implants in the lateralization technique and in inferior alveolar nerve transposition and to determine the most effective sensory test.We conclude that the success rate is linked to the possibility of installing implants with long bicortical anchor which favors primary stability and biomechanics.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Post Graduation, Division of Implantology, School of Dentistry, University of Santo Amaro (UNISA), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

ABSTRACT
Bone resorption of the posterior mandible can result in diminished bone edge and, therefore, the installation of implants in these regions becomes a challenge, especially in the presence of the mandibular canal and its contents, the inferior alveolar nerve. Several treatment alternatives are suggested: the use of short implants, guided bone regeneration, appositional bone grafting, distraction osteogenesis, inclined implants tangential to the mandibular canal, and the lateralization of the inferior alveolar nerve. The aim was to elucidate the success rate of implants in the lateralization technique and in inferior alveolar nerve transposition and to determine the most effective sensory test. We conclude that the success rate is linked to the possibility of installing implants with long bicortical anchor which favors primary stability and biomechanics.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus