Relationship between number of systematic reviews and p

Limits...

Identifying gaps for research prioritisation: Global burden of external causes of injury as reflected in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Karimkhani C, Trikha R, Aksut B, Jones T, Boyers LN, Schlichte M, Pederson H, Okland T, DiGuiseppi C, Nasser M, Naghavi M, Vos T, Yoong SL, Wolfenden L, Murray CJ, Dellavalle RP - Injury (2016) Bottom Line: Correlation testing revealed a strong positive correlation that was statistically significant.Representation of falls was greater compared to DALY, while self-harm, exposure to forces of nature, and other transport injury representation was lower compared to DALY.These results provide high-quality and transparent data that may guide future prioritisation decisions. View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed Affiliation: Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. No MeSH data available. Related in: MedlinePlus	© Copyright Policy - CC BY Related In: Results - Collection License Show All Figures getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4862959&req=5 fig0005: Relationship between number of systematic reviews and protocols in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and percent of total 2010 DALYs for 12 injury and trauma conditions. Mentions: Falls and road injury had the greatest representation in CDSR with 45 and 44 titles, respectively (see Table 2 and Fig. 1). These two causes also had the greatest cumulative number of studies informing the systematic review evidence-base (911 and 515, respectively). Falls had disproportionately greater CDSR representation compared to its disease burden.

Identifying gaps for research prioritisation: Global burden of external causes of injury as reflected in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Karimkhani C, Trikha R, Aksut B, Jones T, Boyers LN, Schlichte M, Pederson H, Okland T, DiGuiseppi C, Nasser M, Naghavi M, Vos T, Yoong SL, Wolfenden L, Murray CJ, Dellavalle RP - Injury (2016)

Bottom Line: Correlation testing revealed a strong positive correlation that was statistically significant.Representation of falls was greater compared to DALY, while self-harm, exposure to forces of nature, and other transport injury representation was lower compared to DALY.These results provide high-quality and transparent data that may guide future prioritisation decisions.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

No MeSH data available.

Related in: MedlinePlus

Relationship between number of systematic reviews and protocols in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and percent of total 2010 DALYs for 12 injury and trauma conditions.

Related In: Results - Collection

License

Show All Figures

getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4862959&req=5

fig0005: Relationship between number of systematic reviews and protocols in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and percent of total 2010 DALYs for 12 injury and trauma conditions.

Mentions: Falls and road injury had the greatest representation in CDSR with 45 and 44 titles, respectively (see Table 2 and Fig. 1). These two causes also had the greatest cumulative number of studies informing the systematic review evidence-base (911 and 515, respectively). Falls had disproportionately greater CDSR representation compared to its disease burden.