Limits...
Empirical comparison of color normalization methods for epithelial-stromal classification in H and E images.

Sethi A, Sha L, Vahadane AR, Deaton RJ, Kumar N, Macias V, Gann PH - J Pathol Inform (2016)

Bottom Line: For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images.Khan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance.Color normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India; Department of Pathology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.

ABSTRACT

Context: Color normalization techniques for histology have not been empirically tested for their utility for computational pathology pipelines.

Aims: We compared two contemporary techniques for achieving a common intermediate goal - epithelial-stromal classification.

Settings and design: Expert-annotated regions of epithelium and stroma were treated as ground truth for comparing classifiers on original and color-normalized images.

Materials and methods: Epithelial and stromal regions were annotated on thirty diverse-appearing H and E stained prostate cancer tissue microarray cores. Corresponding sets of thirty images each were generated using the two color normalization techniques. Color metrics were compared for original and color-normalized images. Separate epithelial-stromal classifiers were trained and compared on test images. Main analyses were conducted using a multiresolution segmentation (MRS) approach; comparative analyses using two other classification approaches (convolutional neural network [CNN], Wndchrm) were also performed.

Statistical analysis: For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images. For CNN and Wndchrm, pixel classification test-AUCs were compared.

Results: Khan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance. Super-pixel-level test-AUC for MRS was 0.010-0.025 (95% confidence interval limits ± 0.004) higher for the two normalized image sets compared to the original in the 10-80 variable range. Improvement in pixel classification accuracy was also observed for CNN and Wndchrm for color-normalized images.

Conclusions: Color normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

An example H and E stained tissue image (left), its super-pixel boundaries (center, green), and detected dark sub-objects (right, black)
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4837797&req=5

Figure 6: An example H and E stained tissue image (left), its super-pixel boundaries (center, green), and detected dark sub-objects (right, black)

Mentions: Figure 6 shows an example of a part of an image on the left. In the middle, its segmentation into super-pixels using MRS on R, G, and B channels with no constraint on shapes, and a scale parameter of 75 is shown. The panel on the right shows its segmentation of DarkSmall sub-objects.


Empirical comparison of color normalization methods for epithelial-stromal classification in H and E images.

Sethi A, Sha L, Vahadane AR, Deaton RJ, Kumar N, Macias V, Gann PH - J Pathol Inform (2016)

An example H and E stained tissue image (left), its super-pixel boundaries (center, green), and detected dark sub-objects (right, black)
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4837797&req=5

Figure 6: An example H and E stained tissue image (left), its super-pixel boundaries (center, green), and detected dark sub-objects (right, black)
Mentions: Figure 6 shows an example of a part of an image on the left. In the middle, its segmentation into super-pixels using MRS on R, G, and B channels with no constraint on shapes, and a scale parameter of 75 is shown. The panel on the right shows its segmentation of DarkSmall sub-objects.

Bottom Line: For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images.Khan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance.Color normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India; Department of Pathology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.

ABSTRACT

Context: Color normalization techniques for histology have not been empirically tested for their utility for computational pathology pipelines.

Aims: We compared two contemporary techniques for achieving a common intermediate goal - epithelial-stromal classification.

Settings and design: Expert-annotated regions of epithelium and stroma were treated as ground truth for comparing classifiers on original and color-normalized images.

Materials and methods: Epithelial and stromal regions were annotated on thirty diverse-appearing H and E stained prostate cancer tissue microarray cores. Corresponding sets of thirty images each were generated using the two color normalization techniques. Color metrics were compared for original and color-normalized images. Separate epithelial-stromal classifiers were trained and compared on test images. Main analyses were conducted using a multiresolution segmentation (MRS) approach; comparative analyses using two other classification approaches (convolutional neural network [CNN], Wndchrm) were also performed.

Statistical analysis: For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images. For CNN and Wndchrm, pixel classification test-AUCs were compared.

Results: Khan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance. Super-pixel-level test-AUC for MRS was 0.010-0.025 (95% confidence interval limits ± 0.004) higher for the two normalized image sets compared to the original in the 10-80 variable range. Improvement in pixel classification accuracy was also observed for CNN and Wndchrm for color-normalized images.

Conclusions: Color normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus