Limits...
Comparison of implant cast accuracy of multiple implant impression technique with different splinting materials: An in vitro study

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

Introduction:: An accurate and passive fit of implant framework prosthesis, as well as the successful surgical operation is suggested as one of the critical requirements for long-term implant success.

Objective:: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of the master cast using open tray impression technique with conventional and novel splinting materials.

Methodology:: A mandibular reference model with four ADIN implants was done. Ten custom trays were fabricated using the light curable resin sheets. Medium body polyether impression material was used. These trays were randomly divided between the two groups, with five trays in each group. Impression techniques were divided into two groups namely: Group A: Direct impression technique with open tray impression copings splinted with autopolymerizing acrylic resin (GC pattern resin). Group B: Direct impression technique with open tray impression copings splinted with Pro-temp TM 4 (bis-GMA) syringable temporization material. Thus, final impressions were made. Total of 10 master casts were fabricated. Evaluation of casts using Dynascope-Vision Engineering, TESA microhite two- dimension and coordinate measuring machine were used.

Results:: Statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA test and post-hoc test. Same amount of deviation values obtained with resin splinted and bis-GMA splinted impression copings.

Conclusion:: The master cast obtained by both the splinting material exhibits no difference from the reference model. So bis-GMA can be used, which is easy to handle, less time consuming, less technique sensitive, rigid, and readily available material in clinics.

No MeSH data available.


TESA microhite two dimension
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4837773&req=5

Figure 11: TESA microhite two dimension

Mentions: Dynoscope-Vision engineering (TESPA Calibration centre) was used to measure the X and Y axis. The magnified image of each implant in reference model and implant replica in the master casts were visualized in the computer and the external margin of each implant and implant replica was taken as reference point. The co-ordinates of the center of replica one was measured and zeroed and kept as (X0, Y0). Keeping this as the reference position the centers of the other three replicas were determined and the linear distance between the centers of implant/replica were all measured in the X and Y planes. Thus, the linear distance between the centers of replica/implant are 1 and 2 (D1 x/y), 1 and 3 (D2 x/y) and 1, and 4 (D3 x/y) were all measured digitally [Figures 10 and 11].


Comparison of implant cast accuracy of multiple implant impression technique with different splinting materials: An in vitro study
TESA microhite two dimension
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4837773&req=5

Figure 11: TESA microhite two dimension
Mentions: Dynoscope-Vision engineering (TESPA Calibration centre) was used to measure the X and Y axis. The magnified image of each implant in reference model and implant replica in the master casts were visualized in the computer and the external margin of each implant and implant replica was taken as reference point. The co-ordinates of the center of replica one was measured and zeroed and kept as (X0, Y0). Keeping this as the reference position the centers of the other three replicas were determined and the linear distance between the centers of implant/replica were all measured in the X and Y planes. Thus, the linear distance between the centers of replica/implant are 1 and 2 (D1 x/y), 1 and 3 (D2 x/y) and 1, and 4 (D3 x/y) were all measured digitally [Figures 10 and 11].

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

ABSTRACT

Introduction:: An accurate and passive fit of implant framework prosthesis, as well as the successful surgical operation is suggested as one of the critical requirements for long-term implant success.

Objective:: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of the master cast using open tray impression technique with conventional and novel splinting materials.

Methodology:: A mandibular reference model with four ADIN implants was done. Ten custom trays were fabricated using the light curable resin sheets. Medium body polyether impression material was used. These trays were randomly divided between the two groups, with five trays in each group. Impression techniques were divided into two groups namely: Group A: Direct impression technique with open tray impression copings splinted with autopolymerizing acrylic resin (GC pattern resin). Group B: Direct impression technique with open tray impression copings splinted with Pro-temp TM 4 (bis-GMA) syringable temporization material. Thus, final impressions were made. Total of 10 master casts were fabricated. Evaluation of casts using Dynascope-Vision Engineering, TESA microhite two- dimension and coordinate measuring machine were used.

Results:: Statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA test and post-hoc test. Same amount of deviation values obtained with resin splinted and bis-GMA splinted impression copings.

Conclusion:: The master cast obtained by both the splinting material exhibits no difference from the reference model. So bis-GMA can be used, which is easy to handle, less time consuming, less technique sensitive, rigid, and readily available material in clinics.

No MeSH data available.