Limits...
Comparative analysis of the retention of maxillary denture base with and without border molding using zinc oxide eugenol impression paste.

Kaur S, Datta K, Gupta SK, Suman N - Indian J Dent (2016 Jan-Mar)

Bottom Line: On both trays, the final impression was made with zinc oxide eugenol impression paste.Mean force with border molding (2765.0 g) was larger than mean force without border molding (1805.0 g) at P < 0.01 level.In terms of percentage, too, the mean improvement (59.4%) in force of dislodgement was statistically highly significant (i.e. P < 0.01).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

ABSTRACT

Aims and objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of border molding on the retention of the maxillary denture base.

Materials and methods: Two special trays, one with full extensions to the periphery and one 2 mm short from the borders were made on the cast obtained from the preliminary impression. Border molding was done on the tray which was short from borders. On both trays, the final impression was made with zinc oxide eugenol impression paste. Heat cure denture bases were fabricated on the prepared casts and retention was measured using specially designed instrument.

Observations and results: Mean force with border molding (2765.0 g) was larger than mean force without border molding (1805.0 g) at P < 0.01 level. In terms of percentage, too, the mean improvement (59.4%) in force of dislodgement was statistically highly significant (i.e. P < 0.01).

Clinical significance: The results of the present study suggest that the dentures made with border molding will provide better retentive force than the dentures made without border molding.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Pattern of the force of dislodgement in respect of the two study groups
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4836091&req=5

Figure 7: Pattern of the force of dislodgement in respect of the two study groups

Mentions: Finally, variations among the observations on force of dislodgement in respect of the two study groups have been depicted diagrammatically in the graphs [Graphs 1 and 2].


Comparative analysis of the retention of maxillary denture base with and without border molding using zinc oxide eugenol impression paste.

Kaur S, Datta K, Gupta SK, Suman N - Indian J Dent (2016 Jan-Mar)

Pattern of the force of dislodgement in respect of the two study groups
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4836091&req=5

Figure 7: Pattern of the force of dislodgement in respect of the two study groups
Mentions: Finally, variations among the observations on force of dislodgement in respect of the two study groups have been depicted diagrammatically in the graphs [Graphs 1 and 2].

Bottom Line: On both trays, the final impression was made with zinc oxide eugenol impression paste.Mean force with border molding (2765.0 g) was larger than mean force without border molding (1805.0 g) at P < 0.01 level.In terms of percentage, too, the mean improvement (59.4%) in force of dislodgement was statistically highly significant (i.e. P < 0.01).

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

ABSTRACT

Aims and objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of border molding on the retention of the maxillary denture base.

Materials and methods: Two special trays, one with full extensions to the periphery and one 2 mm short from the borders were made on the cast obtained from the preliminary impression. Border molding was done on the tray which was short from borders. On both trays, the final impression was made with zinc oxide eugenol impression paste. Heat cure denture bases were fabricated on the prepared casts and retention was measured using specially designed instrument.

Observations and results: Mean force with border molding (2765.0 g) was larger than mean force without border molding (1805.0 g) at P < 0.01 level. In terms of percentage, too, the mean improvement (59.4%) in force of dislodgement was statistically highly significant (i.e. P < 0.01).

Clinical significance: The results of the present study suggest that the dentures made with border molding will provide better retentive force than the dentures made without border molding.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus