Limits...
Modified bathroom scale and balance assessment: a comparison with clinical tests.

Duchêne J, Hewson D, Rumeau P - Springerplus (2016)

Bottom Line: Raw data, partial scores and the global score were compared with the results of the three geriatric tests.ROC curves for OS cut-off values (4 and 5 s) were produced, with the best results obtained for a 5 s cut-off, both with the partial scores combined using Fisher's combination (specificity 85 %: <0.11, sensitivity 85 %: >0.48), and with the empirical score (specificity 85 %: <7, sensitivity 85 %: >8).A BQT empirical score of less than seven can detect fall risk in a community dwelling population.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Institut Charles Delaunay, UMR CNRS 6279, University of Technology of Troyes, 12 Rue Marie Curie, CS 42060, 10004 Troyes, France.

ABSTRACT
Frailty and detection of fall risk are major issues in preventive gerontology. A simple tool frequently used in daily life, a bathroom scale (balance quality tester: BQT), was modified to obtain information on the balance of 84 outpatients consulting at a geriatric clinic. The results computed from the BQT were compared to the values of three geriatric tests that are widely used either to detect a fall risk or frailty (timed get up and go: TUG; 10 m walking speed: WS; walking time: WT; one-leg stand: OS). The BQT calculates four parameters that are then scored and weighted, thus creating an overall indicator of balance quality. Raw data, partial scores and the global score were compared with the results of the three geriatric tests. The WT values had the highest correlation with BQT raw data (r = 0.55), while TUG (r = 0.53) and WS (r = 0.56) had the highest correlation with BQT partial scores. ROC curves for OS cut-off values (4 and 5 s) were produced, with the best results obtained for a 5 s cut-off, both with the partial scores combined using Fisher's combination (specificity 85 %: <0.11, sensitivity 85 %: >0.48), and with the empirical score (specificity 85 %: <7, sensitivity 85 %: >8). A BQT empirical score of less than seven can detect fall risk in a community dwelling population.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

a WS versus BQT PS; b WS versus BQT NV; c WS versus ES; d WS versus TUG
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4835412&req=5

Fig3: a WS versus BQT PS; b WS versus BQT NV; c WS versus ES; d WS versus TUG

Mentions: The result for the model with the best fit, WS against BQT PS, is shown in Fig. 3a, while WS against the BQT NV is shown in Fig. 3b. The relationship between WS and ES is shown in Fig. 3c, while the correlation between the two observed variables WS and TUG can be seen in Fig. 3d.Fig. 3


Modified bathroom scale and balance assessment: a comparison with clinical tests.

Duchêne J, Hewson D, Rumeau P - Springerplus (2016)

a WS versus BQT PS; b WS versus BQT NV; c WS versus ES; d WS versus TUG
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4835412&req=5

Fig3: a WS versus BQT PS; b WS versus BQT NV; c WS versus ES; d WS versus TUG
Mentions: The result for the model with the best fit, WS against BQT PS, is shown in Fig. 3a, while WS against the BQT NV is shown in Fig. 3b. The relationship between WS and ES is shown in Fig. 3c, while the correlation between the two observed variables WS and TUG can be seen in Fig. 3d.Fig. 3

Bottom Line: Raw data, partial scores and the global score were compared with the results of the three geriatric tests.ROC curves for OS cut-off values (4 and 5 s) were produced, with the best results obtained for a 5 s cut-off, both with the partial scores combined using Fisher's combination (specificity 85 %: <0.11, sensitivity 85 %: >0.48), and with the empirical score (specificity 85 %: <7, sensitivity 85 %: >8).A BQT empirical score of less than seven can detect fall risk in a community dwelling population.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Institut Charles Delaunay, UMR CNRS 6279, University of Technology of Troyes, 12 Rue Marie Curie, CS 42060, 10004 Troyes, France.

ABSTRACT
Frailty and detection of fall risk are major issues in preventive gerontology. A simple tool frequently used in daily life, a bathroom scale (balance quality tester: BQT), was modified to obtain information on the balance of 84 outpatients consulting at a geriatric clinic. The results computed from the BQT were compared to the values of three geriatric tests that are widely used either to detect a fall risk or frailty (timed get up and go: TUG; 10 m walking speed: WS; walking time: WT; one-leg stand: OS). The BQT calculates four parameters that are then scored and weighted, thus creating an overall indicator of balance quality. Raw data, partial scores and the global score were compared with the results of the three geriatric tests. The WT values had the highest correlation with BQT raw data (r = 0.55), while TUG (r = 0.53) and WS (r = 0.56) had the highest correlation with BQT partial scores. ROC curves for OS cut-off values (4 and 5 s) were produced, with the best results obtained for a 5 s cut-off, both with the partial scores combined using Fisher's combination (specificity 85 %: <0.11, sensitivity 85 %: >0.48), and with the empirical score (specificity 85 %: <7, sensitivity 85 %: >8). A BQT empirical score of less than seven can detect fall risk in a community dwelling population.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus