Limits...
Differences in medical schools' regional retention of physicians by school type and year of establishment: effect of new schools built under government policy.

Kamitani S, Nakamura F, Itoh M, Sugiyama T, Toyokawa S, Kobayashi Y - BMC Health Serv Res (2015)

Bottom Line: Physicians who graduated from private medical schools were also less likely to practice in the prefecture of their medical school location, relative to those who graduated from public medical schools (adjusted odds ratio: 0.63; 95 % confidence interval: 0.51-0.77).There was a considerable difference between medical schools in retaining graduates locally.The study results may have significant implications for government policy to alleviate maldistribution of physicians in Japan.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. kamitanis@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

ABSTRACT

Background: Physician maldistribution is an ongoing concern globally. The extent of medical schools retaining graduates within their geographical areas has rarely been explored in Japan or in other countries. This study aimed to investigate whether the proportion of medical school graduates practicing in the vicinity of medical school (retention rate) differs by the year of the school's establishment and by the school's funding source.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used a set of databases on medical institutions and personnel. We analyzed a sample of 168,594 clinically active physicians practicing in institutions as of May 2014, who passed the National Medical Practitioners Examination between 1985 and 2013. We assessed the retention rate and the schools' establishment period and funding source (pre-1970/post-1970, private/public), using a hierarchical regression model with random intercept unique to each medical school. We used the following factors as covariates: gender, physicians' length of professional experience, and the geographical features of the medical schools.

Results: The retention rate was widely distributed from 16.2 to 81.5 % (median: 48.4 %). Physicians who graduated from post-1970 medical schools were less likely to practice in the prefecture of their medical school location, relative to those who graduated from pre-1970 medical schools (adjusted odds ratio: 0.75; 95 % confidence interval: 0.62-0.90). Physicians who graduated from private medical schools were also less likely to practice in the prefecture of their medical school location, relative to those who graduated from public medical schools (adjusted odds ratio: 0.63; 95 % confidence interval: 0.51-0.77). In addition, the ability to retain graduates varied by school according to the school's characteristics.

Conclusions: There was a considerable difference between medical schools in retaining graduates locally. The study results may have significant implications for government policy to alleviate maldistribution of physicians in Japan.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Retention rates for physicians practicing in the prefecture of their medical school. Retention rates are categorized according to the year of the school’s establishment (pre-1970 or post-1970) and funding mechanism (public or private). Horizontal lines in each box plot represent lower adjacent, 25th percentile, median, 25th percentile, and upper adjacent positions from the bottom
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4696324&req=5

Fig3: Retention rates for physicians practicing in the prefecture of their medical school. Retention rates are categorized according to the year of the school’s establishment (pre-1970 or post-1970) and funding mechanism (public or private). Horizontal lines in each box plot represent lower adjacent, 25th percentile, median, 25th percentile, and upper adjacent positions from the bottom

Mentions: Figure 2 shows the retention rates for graduates practicing in the prefecture of their medical school location (the primary outcome). This rate ranged widely, from 16.2 to 81.5 %, with a median of 48.4 %. Figure 3 shows the retention rates for medical schools categorized according to year of establishment and funding mechanism. The range of retention rates varied according to category. Pre-1970 public medical schools demonstrated the largest range of proportions (from 30.1 to 81.5 %), while pre-1970 private medical schools showed the smallest range of proportions (from 38.0 to 61.0 %). The median proportions of pre-1970 medical schools were higher than those of the post-1970 medical schools (53.5, 51.3, 37.4, and 40.0 % for pre-1970 public, pre-1970 private, post-1970 public, and post-1970 private medical schools, respectively).Fig. 2


Differences in medical schools' regional retention of physicians by school type and year of establishment: effect of new schools built under government policy.

Kamitani S, Nakamura F, Itoh M, Sugiyama T, Toyokawa S, Kobayashi Y - BMC Health Serv Res (2015)

Retention rates for physicians practicing in the prefecture of their medical school. Retention rates are categorized according to the year of the school’s establishment (pre-1970 or post-1970) and funding mechanism (public or private). Horizontal lines in each box plot represent lower adjacent, 25th percentile, median, 25th percentile, and upper adjacent positions from the bottom
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4696324&req=5

Fig3: Retention rates for physicians practicing in the prefecture of their medical school. Retention rates are categorized according to the year of the school’s establishment (pre-1970 or post-1970) and funding mechanism (public or private). Horizontal lines in each box plot represent lower adjacent, 25th percentile, median, 25th percentile, and upper adjacent positions from the bottom
Mentions: Figure 2 shows the retention rates for graduates practicing in the prefecture of their medical school location (the primary outcome). This rate ranged widely, from 16.2 to 81.5 %, with a median of 48.4 %. Figure 3 shows the retention rates for medical schools categorized according to year of establishment and funding mechanism. The range of retention rates varied according to category. Pre-1970 public medical schools demonstrated the largest range of proportions (from 30.1 to 81.5 %), while pre-1970 private medical schools showed the smallest range of proportions (from 38.0 to 61.0 %). The median proportions of pre-1970 medical schools were higher than those of the post-1970 medical schools (53.5, 51.3, 37.4, and 40.0 % for pre-1970 public, pre-1970 private, post-1970 public, and post-1970 private medical schools, respectively).Fig. 2

Bottom Line: Physicians who graduated from private medical schools were also less likely to practice in the prefecture of their medical school location, relative to those who graduated from public medical schools (adjusted odds ratio: 0.63; 95 % confidence interval: 0.51-0.77).There was a considerable difference between medical schools in retaining graduates locally.The study results may have significant implications for government policy to alleviate maldistribution of physicians in Japan.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. kamitanis@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

ABSTRACT

Background: Physician maldistribution is an ongoing concern globally. The extent of medical schools retaining graduates within their geographical areas has rarely been explored in Japan or in other countries. This study aimed to investigate whether the proportion of medical school graduates practicing in the vicinity of medical school (retention rate) differs by the year of the school's establishment and by the school's funding source.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used a set of databases on medical institutions and personnel. We analyzed a sample of 168,594 clinically active physicians practicing in institutions as of May 2014, who passed the National Medical Practitioners Examination between 1985 and 2013. We assessed the retention rate and the schools' establishment period and funding source (pre-1970/post-1970, private/public), using a hierarchical regression model with random intercept unique to each medical school. We used the following factors as covariates: gender, physicians' length of professional experience, and the geographical features of the medical schools.

Results: The retention rate was widely distributed from 16.2 to 81.5 % (median: 48.4 %). Physicians who graduated from post-1970 medical schools were less likely to practice in the prefecture of their medical school location, relative to those who graduated from pre-1970 medical schools (adjusted odds ratio: 0.75; 95 % confidence interval: 0.62-0.90). Physicians who graduated from private medical schools were also less likely to practice in the prefecture of their medical school location, relative to those who graduated from public medical schools (adjusted odds ratio: 0.63; 95 % confidence interval: 0.51-0.77). In addition, the ability to retain graduates varied by school according to the school's characteristics.

Conclusions: There was a considerable difference between medical schools in retaining graduates locally. The study results may have significant implications for government policy to alleviate maldistribution of physicians in Japan.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus