Limits...
Prevalence of foot disease and risk factors in general inpatient populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lazzarini PA, Hurn SE, Fernando ME, Jen SD, Kuys SS, Kamp MC, Reed LF - BMJ Open (2015)

Bottom Line: Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models where 3 eligible studies were available.Heterogeneity was high in all pooled estimates (I(2)=94.2-97.8%, p<0.001).These findings are likely an underestimate and more robust studies are required to provide more precise estimates.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Allied Health Research Collaborative, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Search strategy and study selection results.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4663442&req=5

BMJOPEN2015008544F1: Search strategy and study selection results.

Mentions: The authors have adhered to the PRISMA guideline reporting checklist (see online supplementary table S1) and PRISMA flow diagram (see figure 1).25


Prevalence of foot disease and risk factors in general inpatient populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lazzarini PA, Hurn SE, Fernando ME, Jen SD, Kuys SS, Kamp MC, Reed LF - BMJ Open (2015)

Search strategy and study selection results.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4663442&req=5

BMJOPEN2015008544F1: Search strategy and study selection results.
Mentions: The authors have adhered to the PRISMA guideline reporting checklist (see online supplementary table S1) and PRISMA flow diagram (see figure 1).25

Bottom Line: Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models where 3 eligible studies were available.Heterogeneity was high in all pooled estimates (I(2)=94.2-97.8%, p<0.001).These findings are likely an underestimate and more robust studies are required to provide more precise estimates.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Allied Health Research Collaborative, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus