Limits...
A Simplified Method for the Restoration of Severely Decayed Primary Incisors.

Talebi M, Parisay I, Khorakian F, Nik E - J Dent (Tehran) (2015)

Bottom Line: The restorations were evaluated using the modified United State Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.The results were statistically analyzed by descriptive -analytical tests.The sectioned file post technique showed good retention and aesthetics for restoring severely damaged primary maxillary anterior teeth.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Material Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Caries and dental trauma are common reasons for primary anterior teeth restorations in children. This non-control clinical trial was designed to evaluate crown restorations reinforced with a sectioned file post for the restoration of severely damaged primary maxillary incisors.

Materials and methods: Thirty-eight primary maxillary incisors of 12 children (3-5 years old) with early childhood caries (ECC) received composite restorations with a custom made post. The restorations were evaluated using the modified United State Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The results were statistically analyzed by descriptive -analytical tests.

Results: In this trial, the quality of marginal adaptation decreased after three and 12 months intervals. Recurrent carious lesions were observed during intervals. In terms of restoration retention, only one patient lost both the post and the restoration at the 12-month follow up.

Conclusion: The sectioned file post technique showed good retention and aesthetics for restoring severely damaged primary maxillary anterior teeth.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Final restoration
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4663306&req=5

Figure 3: Final restoration

Mentions: The excess composite at the lingual and gingival margins was removed with finishing and polishing burs (Jota, Switzerland). Occlusion was checked and after the removal of interferences, the final finishing and polishing of the restoration was performed with a polishing disc (Soflex, 3M ESPE, USA) (Figure 3).


A Simplified Method for the Restoration of Severely Decayed Primary Incisors.

Talebi M, Parisay I, Khorakian F, Nik E - J Dent (Tehran) (2015)

Final restoration
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4663306&req=5

Figure 3: Final restoration
Mentions: The excess composite at the lingual and gingival margins was removed with finishing and polishing burs (Jota, Switzerland). Occlusion was checked and after the removal of interferences, the final finishing and polishing of the restoration was performed with a polishing disc (Soflex, 3M ESPE, USA) (Figure 3).

Bottom Line: The restorations were evaluated using the modified United State Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.The results were statistically analyzed by descriptive -analytical tests.The sectioned file post technique showed good retention and aesthetics for restoring severely damaged primary maxillary anterior teeth.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Material Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Caries and dental trauma are common reasons for primary anterior teeth restorations in children. This non-control clinical trial was designed to evaluate crown restorations reinforced with a sectioned file post for the restoration of severely damaged primary maxillary incisors.

Materials and methods: Thirty-eight primary maxillary incisors of 12 children (3-5 years old) with early childhood caries (ECC) received composite restorations with a custom made post. The restorations were evaluated using the modified United State Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The results were statistically analyzed by descriptive -analytical tests.

Results: In this trial, the quality of marginal adaptation decreased after three and 12 months intervals. Recurrent carious lesions were observed during intervals. In terms of restoration retention, only one patient lost both the post and the restoration at the 12-month follow up.

Conclusion: The sectioned file post technique showed good retention and aesthetics for restoring severely damaged primary maxillary anterior teeth.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus