Limits...
Sleep in Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster (1,2,3).

Liu C, Haynes PR, Donelson NC, Aharon S, Griffith LC - eNeuro (2015)

Bottom Line: Social interactions between pairs of flies have been shown to affect locomotor activity patterns, but effects on locomotion and sleep patterns have not been assessed for larger populations.Surprisingly, we find that same-sex populations of flies synchronize their sleep/wake activity, resulting in a population sleep pattern, which is similar but not identical to that of isolated individuals.These data support the idea that it is possible to investigate neural mechanisms underlying the effects of population behaviors on sleep by directly looking at a large number of animals in laboratory conditions.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Biology, National Center for Behavioral Genomics and Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110.

ABSTRACT
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a diurnal insect active during the day with consolidated sleep at night. Social interactions between pairs of flies have been shown to affect locomotor activity patterns, but effects on locomotion and sleep patterns have not been assessed for larger populations. Here, we use a commercially available locomotor activity monitor (LAM25H) system to record and analyze sleep behavior. Surprisingly, we find that same-sex populations of flies synchronize their sleep/wake activity, resulting in a population sleep pattern, which is similar but not identical to that of isolated individuals. Like individual flies, groups of flies show circadian and homeostatic regulation of sleep, as well as sexual dimorphism in sleep pattern and sensitivity to starvation and a known sleep-disrupting mutation (amnesiac). Populations of flies, however, exhibit distinct sleep characteristics from individuals. Differences in sleep appear to be due to olfaction-dependent social interactions and change with population size and sex ratio. These data support the idea that it is possible to investigate neural mechanisms underlying the effects of population behaviors on sleep by directly looking at a large number of animals in laboratory conditions.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Suppression of sleep by starvation generates rebound sleep in populations. Sleep patterns generated by starvation in female (A) and male (B) flies in populations. C, Total daytime and nighttime sleep changes are plotted as mean ± SEM. Male flies’ sleep was reduced significantly during the day and night, but female flies’ sleep was significantly suppressed only in the night. Red bar indicates the starvation period. Twenty-four hour starvation-induced sleep loss was compensated after feeding on the recovery day. Δ Total sleep: total sleep changes. n = 8 for all conditions. ***p < 0.0001; n.s., no significant difference. ZT, Zeitgeber time; F, female; M, male.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4596024&req=5

Figure 4: Suppression of sleep by starvation generates rebound sleep in populations. Sleep patterns generated by starvation in female (A) and male (B) flies in populations. C, Total daytime and nighttime sleep changes are plotted as mean ± SEM. Male flies’ sleep was reduced significantly during the day and night, but female flies’ sleep was significantly suppressed only in the night. Red bar indicates the starvation period. Twenty-four hour starvation-induced sleep loss was compensated after feeding on the recovery day. Δ Total sleep: total sleep changes. n = 8 for all conditions. ***p < 0.0001; n.s., no significant difference. ZT, Zeitgeber time; F, female; M, male.

Mentions: t Test and nonparametric


Sleep in Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster (1,2,3).

Liu C, Haynes PR, Donelson NC, Aharon S, Griffith LC - eNeuro (2015)

Suppression of sleep by starvation generates rebound sleep in populations. Sleep patterns generated by starvation in female (A) and male (B) flies in populations. C, Total daytime and nighttime sleep changes are plotted as mean ± SEM. Male flies’ sleep was reduced significantly during the day and night, but female flies’ sleep was significantly suppressed only in the night. Red bar indicates the starvation period. Twenty-four hour starvation-induced sleep loss was compensated after feeding on the recovery day. Δ Total sleep: total sleep changes. n = 8 for all conditions. ***p < 0.0001; n.s., no significant difference. ZT, Zeitgeber time; F, female; M, male.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4596024&req=5

Figure 4: Suppression of sleep by starvation generates rebound sleep in populations. Sleep patterns generated by starvation in female (A) and male (B) flies in populations. C, Total daytime and nighttime sleep changes are plotted as mean ± SEM. Male flies’ sleep was reduced significantly during the day and night, but female flies’ sleep was significantly suppressed only in the night. Red bar indicates the starvation period. Twenty-four hour starvation-induced sleep loss was compensated after feeding on the recovery day. Δ Total sleep: total sleep changes. n = 8 for all conditions. ***p < 0.0001; n.s., no significant difference. ZT, Zeitgeber time; F, female; M, male.
Mentions: t Test and nonparametric

Bottom Line: Social interactions between pairs of flies have been shown to affect locomotor activity patterns, but effects on locomotion and sleep patterns have not been assessed for larger populations.Surprisingly, we find that same-sex populations of flies synchronize their sleep/wake activity, resulting in a population sleep pattern, which is similar but not identical to that of isolated individuals.These data support the idea that it is possible to investigate neural mechanisms underlying the effects of population behaviors on sleep by directly looking at a large number of animals in laboratory conditions.

View Article: PubMed Central - HTML - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Biology, National Center for Behavioral Genomics and Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110.

ABSTRACT
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a diurnal insect active during the day with consolidated sleep at night. Social interactions between pairs of flies have been shown to affect locomotor activity patterns, but effects on locomotion and sleep patterns have not been assessed for larger populations. Here, we use a commercially available locomotor activity monitor (LAM25H) system to record and analyze sleep behavior. Surprisingly, we find that same-sex populations of flies synchronize their sleep/wake activity, resulting in a population sleep pattern, which is similar but not identical to that of isolated individuals. Like individual flies, groups of flies show circadian and homeostatic regulation of sleep, as well as sexual dimorphism in sleep pattern and sensitivity to starvation and a known sleep-disrupting mutation (amnesiac). Populations of flies, however, exhibit distinct sleep characteristics from individuals. Differences in sleep appear to be due to olfaction-dependent social interactions and change with population size and sex ratio. These data support the idea that it is possible to investigate neural mechanisms underlying the effects of population behaviors on sleep by directly looking at a large number of animals in laboratory conditions.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus