Limits...
Correlation Between Clinical-Pathologic Factors and Long-Term Follow-Up in Young Breast Cancer Patients.

Zhao Y, Dong X, Li R, Song J, Zhang D - Transl Oncol (2015)

Bottom Line: Group 3 in risk factor grouping has the poorer prognosis than the other two groups.Patient age and axillary lymph nodes post-surgery are the independent and significant predictors of distant disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.The absence of PR relates to poor prognosis.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Risk factor grouping with outcome. (A) Risk grouping in relation to LRFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 74 months; group 3 with 27 months. (B) Risk grouping in relation to DDFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 67 months; group 3 with 33 months. (C) Risk grouping in relation to OS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 89 months; group 3 with 46 months.
© Copyright Policy - CC BY-NC-ND
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4562982&req=5

f0020: Risk factor grouping with outcome. (A) Risk grouping in relation to LRFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 74 months; group 3 with 27 months. (B) Risk grouping in relation to DDFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 67 months; group 3 with 33 months. (C) Risk grouping in relation to OS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 89 months; group 3 with 46 months.

Mentions: This classification proposed the important risk factors resulting in significantly different LRFS, DDFS, and OS values (all P < .0001). The patients in group 3 were considered to have the worst LRFS, worst DDFS, and worst OS in our cohort (Figure 4, A–C, and Table 4). All of 19 patients in group 3 had distant metastases, and 17 of them with local recurrences have died. Hence, the risk grouping is considered a significant independent predictor of LRFS, DDFS, and OS.


Correlation Between Clinical-Pathologic Factors and Long-Term Follow-Up in Young Breast Cancer Patients.

Zhao Y, Dong X, Li R, Song J, Zhang D - Transl Oncol (2015)

Risk factor grouping with outcome. (A) Risk grouping in relation to LRFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 74 months; group 3 with 27 months. (B) Risk grouping in relation to DDFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 67 months; group 3 with 33 months. (C) Risk grouping in relation to OS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 89 months; group 3 with 46 months.
© Copyright Policy - CC BY-NC-ND
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4562982&req=5

f0020: Risk factor grouping with outcome. (A) Risk grouping in relation to LRFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 74 months; group 3 with 27 months. (B) Risk grouping in relation to DDFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 67 months; group 3 with 33 months. (C) Risk grouping in relation to OS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Median survival time: group 1 with > 99 months; group 2 with 89 months; group 3 with 46 months.
Mentions: This classification proposed the important risk factors resulting in significantly different LRFS, DDFS, and OS values (all P < .0001). The patients in group 3 were considered to have the worst LRFS, worst DDFS, and worst OS in our cohort (Figure 4, A–C, and Table 4). All of 19 patients in group 3 had distant metastases, and 17 of them with local recurrences have died. Hence, the risk grouping is considered a significant independent predictor of LRFS, DDFS, and OS.

Bottom Line: Group 3 in risk factor grouping has the poorer prognosis than the other two groups.Patient age and axillary lymph nodes post-surgery are the independent and significant predictors of distant disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.The absence of PR relates to poor prognosis.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus