Limits...
Reconstruction of alveolar bone defect with autogenous bone particles and osseointegrated implants: Histologic analysis and 10 years monitoring.

de Carvalho PS, de Carvalho MC, Ponzoni D - Ann Maxillofac Surg (2015 Jan-Jun)

Bottom Line: Maintaining the volume of the alveolar process after extraction can be achieved by immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration, with or without the use of biomaterials.The authors present a case report with a 10 years follow-up, rehabilitation using osseointegrated implants in the extraction area and maintenance of the volume of the alveolar process with autogenous cortical bone shavings.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Stomatology Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

ABSTRACT
Maintaining the volume of the alveolar process after extraction can be achieved by immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration, with or without the use of biomaterials. The authors present a case report with a 10 years follow-up, rehabilitation using osseointegrated implants in the extraction area and maintenance of the volume of the alveolar process with autogenous cortical bone shavings.

No MeSH data available.


Six months postoperative
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4555940&req=5

Figure 9: Six months postoperative

Mentions: After 6 months of undistributed healing, the area was exposed to implant installation [Figure 9]. The installation of the implant was performed under local anesthesia supraperiosteal infiltrative terminal. An L-shape incision was made. During drilling, a biopsy of the grafted area was taken with a 2 mm round trephine drill. The sample was decalcified in a solution of 4.3% EDTA, pH 7.2, and if renewing it every week until it is found that the total demineralization. The same was subjected to histological processing. The drilling followed with the use of pilot cutters (2/3 mm), 3 mm, and countersink. A 3.75 mm diameter and 13 mm height cylindrical implant were installed (SIN®, São Paulo, Brazil) and a cover screw was screwed [Figure 10].


Reconstruction of alveolar bone defect with autogenous bone particles and osseointegrated implants: Histologic analysis and 10 years monitoring.

de Carvalho PS, de Carvalho MC, Ponzoni D - Ann Maxillofac Surg (2015 Jan-Jun)

Six months postoperative
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4555940&req=5

Figure 9: Six months postoperative
Mentions: After 6 months of undistributed healing, the area was exposed to implant installation [Figure 9]. The installation of the implant was performed under local anesthesia supraperiosteal infiltrative terminal. An L-shape incision was made. During drilling, a biopsy of the grafted area was taken with a 2 mm round trephine drill. The sample was decalcified in a solution of 4.3% EDTA, pH 7.2, and if renewing it every week until it is found that the total demineralization. The same was subjected to histological processing. The drilling followed with the use of pilot cutters (2/3 mm), 3 mm, and countersink. A 3.75 mm diameter and 13 mm height cylindrical implant were installed (SIN®, São Paulo, Brazil) and a cover screw was screwed [Figure 10].

Bottom Line: Maintaining the volume of the alveolar process after extraction can be achieved by immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration, with or without the use of biomaterials.The authors present a case report with a 10 years follow-up, rehabilitation using osseointegrated implants in the extraction area and maintenance of the volume of the alveolar process with autogenous cortical bone shavings.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Stomatology Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

ABSTRACT
Maintaining the volume of the alveolar process after extraction can be achieved by immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration, with or without the use of biomaterials. The authors present a case report with a 10 years follow-up, rehabilitation using osseointegrated implants in the extraction area and maintenance of the volume of the alveolar process with autogenous cortical bone shavings.

No MeSH data available.