Limits...
A Comparative Analyses of Granulometry, Mineral Composition and Major and Trace Element Concentrations in Soils Commonly Ingested by Humans.

Ngole-Jeme VM, Ekosse GI - Int J Environ Res Public Health (2015)

Bottom Line: The soils from Swaziland were closely associated with silt, H2O and Fe2O3(t).The coarse texture of the samples may also result in dental destruction during mastication.Sieving of the soils before ingestion to remove coarse particles is recommended to reduce the potential health threat associated with the ingestion of coarse-textured soils.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology, North West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa. vm.ngole@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT
This study compared the granulometric properties, mineralogical composition and concentrations of major and trace element oxides of commonly ingested soils (geophagic soil) collected from different countries with a view of understanding how varied they may be in these properties and to understand the possible health implications of ingesting them. Soil samples were collected from three different countries (South Africa, Swaziland and Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)) and their granulometric properties, concentrations of major and trace element oxides as well as mineralogical composition determined. Differences were observed in the granulometric properties of geophagic soil from the three different countries with most of them having <20% clay content. The soils also showed varied degrees of weathering with values of Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) and Chemical Index of Weathering (CIW) being between 60% and 99.9% respectively. The mineral assemblages of the soils from South Africa and Swaziland were dominated by the primary minerals quartz and feldspar whereas soils from DRC had more of kaolinite, a secondary mineral than primary minerals. Soils from DRC were associated with silt, clay, Al2O3, and CIA unlike most samples from South Africa which were associated with SiO2, sand, K2O, CaO, and MgO. The soils from Swaziland were closely associated with silt, H2O and Fe2O3(t). These associations reflect the mineralogy of the samples. These soils are not likely to serve as nutrient supplements because of the low concentrations of the nutrient elements contained. The coarse texture of the samples may also result in dental destruction during mastication. Sieving of the soils before ingestion to remove coarse particles is recommended to reduce the potential health threat associated with the ingestion of coarse-textured soils.

No MeSH data available.


Textural triangle showing the textural classes of the geophagic samples from different countries.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4555257&req=5

ijerph-12-08933-f003: Textural triangle showing the textural classes of the geophagic samples from different countries.

Mentions: The textural classification of the soil samples places most of the samples from South Africa and Swaziland within the sandy loam and silty loam textural groups whereas the soils from DRC were mostly classified as silt or silty clay (Figure 3). This textural classification of the soils contradicts the belief that soils that are deliberately ingested are clayey in texture. The current processing methods of heating and addition of salts employed by vendors of these geophagic soils would have no influence on the granulometric properties which are determined by the soil particle size distribution. Heating may however decrease the parasite and pathogen load of the samples reducing the potential negative effects of geophagia.


A Comparative Analyses of Granulometry, Mineral Composition and Major and Trace Element Concentrations in Soils Commonly Ingested by Humans.

Ngole-Jeme VM, Ekosse GI - Int J Environ Res Public Health (2015)

Textural triangle showing the textural classes of the geophagic samples from different countries.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4555257&req=5

ijerph-12-08933-f003: Textural triangle showing the textural classes of the geophagic samples from different countries.
Mentions: The textural classification of the soil samples places most of the samples from South Africa and Swaziland within the sandy loam and silty loam textural groups whereas the soils from DRC were mostly classified as silt or silty clay (Figure 3). This textural classification of the soils contradicts the belief that soils that are deliberately ingested are clayey in texture. The current processing methods of heating and addition of salts employed by vendors of these geophagic soils would have no influence on the granulometric properties which are determined by the soil particle size distribution. Heating may however decrease the parasite and pathogen load of the samples reducing the potential negative effects of geophagia.

Bottom Line: The soils from Swaziland were closely associated with silt, H2O and Fe2O3(t).The coarse texture of the samples may also result in dental destruction during mastication.Sieving of the soils before ingestion to remove coarse particles is recommended to reduce the potential health threat associated with the ingestion of coarse-textured soils.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology, North West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa. vm.ngole@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT
This study compared the granulometric properties, mineralogical composition and concentrations of major and trace element oxides of commonly ingested soils (geophagic soil) collected from different countries with a view of understanding how varied they may be in these properties and to understand the possible health implications of ingesting them. Soil samples were collected from three different countries (South Africa, Swaziland and Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)) and their granulometric properties, concentrations of major and trace element oxides as well as mineralogical composition determined. Differences were observed in the granulometric properties of geophagic soil from the three different countries with most of them having <20% clay content. The soils also showed varied degrees of weathering with values of Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) and Chemical Index of Weathering (CIW) being between 60% and 99.9% respectively. The mineral assemblages of the soils from South Africa and Swaziland were dominated by the primary minerals quartz and feldspar whereas soils from DRC had more of kaolinite, a secondary mineral than primary minerals. Soils from DRC were associated with silt, clay, Al2O3, and CIA unlike most samples from South Africa which were associated with SiO2, sand, K2O, CaO, and MgO. The soils from Swaziland were closely associated with silt, H2O and Fe2O3(t). These associations reflect the mineralogy of the samples. These soils are not likely to serve as nutrient supplements because of the low concentrations of the nutrient elements contained. The coarse texture of the samples may also result in dental destruction during mastication. Sieving of the soils before ingestion to remove coarse particles is recommended to reduce the potential health threat associated with the ingestion of coarse-textured soils.

No MeSH data available.