Limits...
LiDAR Scan Matching Aided Inertial Navigation System in GNSS-Denied Environments.

Tang J, Chen Y, Niu X, Wang L, Chen L, Liu J, Shi C, Hyyppä J - Sensors (Basel) (2015)

Bottom Line: SLAM performance is poor in featureless environments where the matching errors can significantly increase.Static and dynamic field tests were carried out with a self-developed Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) platform-NAVIS.The results prove that the proposed approach can provide positioning accuracy at the centimetre level for long-term operations, even in a featureless indoor environment.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China. tangjian@whu.edu.cn.

ABSTRACT
A new scan that matches an aided Inertial Navigation System (INS) with a low-cost LiDAR is proposed as an alternative to GNSS-based navigation systems in GNSS-degraded or -denied environments such as indoor areas, dense forests, or urban canyons. In these areas, INS-based Dead Reckoning (DR) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) technologies are normally used to estimate positions as separate tools. However, there are critical implementation problems with each standalone system. The drift errors of velocity, position, and heading angles in an INS will accumulate over time, and on-line calibration is a must for sustaining positioning accuracy. SLAM performance is poor in featureless environments where the matching errors can significantly increase. Each standalone positioning method cannot offer a sustainable navigation solution with acceptable accuracy. This paper integrates two complementary technologies-INS and LiDAR SLAM-into one navigation frame with a loosely coupled Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) to use the advantages and overcome the drawbacks of each system to establish a stable long-term navigation process. Static and dynamic field tests were carried out with a self-developed Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) platform-NAVIS. The results prove that the proposed approach can provide positioning accuracy at the centimetre level for long-term operations, even in a featureless indoor environment.

No MeSH data available.


The pyramid structure of likelihood map and the pre-defined likelihood values.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4541902&req=5

sensors-15-16710-f001: The pyramid structure of likelihood map and the pre-defined likelihood values.

Mentions: As shown in Figure 1, in an IMLE scan matching model, the likelihood map M is organized as a quad-tree pyramid structure to store the likelihood value with multi-resolutions for a large area. It is geo-projected to the INS navigation frame (n-frame) with a Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) 35N project coordinate reference to fuse the output of each standalone system into a universal local reference; the map grid cell is populated with a series of pre-defined likelihood values: 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. These are empirical values based on the Gaussian probability model shown in Equation 13.


LiDAR Scan Matching Aided Inertial Navigation System in GNSS-Denied Environments.

Tang J, Chen Y, Niu X, Wang L, Chen L, Liu J, Shi C, Hyyppä J - Sensors (Basel) (2015)

The pyramid structure of likelihood map and the pre-defined likelihood values.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4541902&req=5

sensors-15-16710-f001: The pyramid structure of likelihood map and the pre-defined likelihood values.
Mentions: As shown in Figure 1, in an IMLE scan matching model, the likelihood map M is organized as a quad-tree pyramid structure to store the likelihood value with multi-resolutions for a large area. It is geo-projected to the INS navigation frame (n-frame) with a Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) 35N project coordinate reference to fuse the output of each standalone system into a universal local reference; the map grid cell is populated with a series of pre-defined likelihood values: 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. These are empirical values based on the Gaussian probability model shown in Equation 13.

Bottom Line: SLAM performance is poor in featureless environments where the matching errors can significantly increase.Static and dynamic field tests were carried out with a self-developed Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) platform-NAVIS.The results prove that the proposed approach can provide positioning accuracy at the centimetre level for long-term operations, even in a featureless indoor environment.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China. tangjian@whu.edu.cn.

ABSTRACT
A new scan that matches an aided Inertial Navigation System (INS) with a low-cost LiDAR is proposed as an alternative to GNSS-based navigation systems in GNSS-degraded or -denied environments such as indoor areas, dense forests, or urban canyons. In these areas, INS-based Dead Reckoning (DR) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) technologies are normally used to estimate positions as separate tools. However, there are critical implementation problems with each standalone system. The drift errors of velocity, position, and heading angles in an INS will accumulate over time, and on-line calibration is a must for sustaining positioning accuracy. SLAM performance is poor in featureless environments where the matching errors can significantly increase. Each standalone positioning method cannot offer a sustainable navigation solution with acceptable accuracy. This paper integrates two complementary technologies-INS and LiDAR SLAM-into one navigation frame with a loosely coupled Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) to use the advantages and overcome the drawbacks of each system to establish a stable long-term navigation process. Static and dynamic field tests were carried out with a self-developed Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) platform-NAVIS. The results prove that the proposed approach can provide positioning accuracy at the centimetre level for long-term operations, even in a featureless indoor environment.

No MeSH data available.