Limits...
Validating a decision tree for serious infection: diagnostic accuracy in acutely ill children in ambulatory care.

Verbakel JY, Lemiengre MB, De Burghgraeve T, De Sutter A, Aertgeerts B, Bullens DM, Shinkins B, Van den Bruel A, Buntinx F - BMJ Open (2015)

Bottom Line: Sensitivity of the decision tree was 100% (95% CI 71.5% to 100%) at a specificity of 83.6% (95% CI 82.3% to 84.9%) in the general practitioner setting with 17% of children testing positive.In the paediatric outpatient and emergency department setting, sensitivities were below 92%, with specificities below 44.8%.NCT02024282.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Four-step decision tree developed by Van den Bruel et al.6 SI, serious infections; GP, general practitioner; yrs, years; red boxes, children testing positive on the decision tree; green box, children testing negative on the decision tree.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4538259&req=5

BMJOPEN2015008657F1: Four-step decision tree developed by Van den Bruel et al.6 SI, serious infections; GP, general practitioner; yrs, years; red boxes, children testing positive on the decision tree; green box, children testing negative on the decision tree.

Mentions: We asked physicians to score variables included in the four-step decision tree, as developed by Van den Bruel et al6 (figure 1).


Validating a decision tree for serious infection: diagnostic accuracy in acutely ill children in ambulatory care.

Verbakel JY, Lemiengre MB, De Burghgraeve T, De Sutter A, Aertgeerts B, Bullens DM, Shinkins B, Van den Bruel A, Buntinx F - BMJ Open (2015)

Four-step decision tree developed by Van den Bruel et al.6 SI, serious infections; GP, general practitioner; yrs, years; red boxes, children testing positive on the decision tree; green box, children testing negative on the decision tree.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4538259&req=5

BMJOPEN2015008657F1: Four-step decision tree developed by Van den Bruel et al.6 SI, serious infections; GP, general practitioner; yrs, years; red boxes, children testing positive on the decision tree; green box, children testing negative on the decision tree.
Mentions: We asked physicians to score variables included in the four-step decision tree, as developed by Van den Bruel et al6 (figure 1).

Bottom Line: Sensitivity of the decision tree was 100% (95% CI 71.5% to 100%) at a specificity of 83.6% (95% CI 82.3% to 84.9%) in the general practitioner setting with 17% of children testing positive.In the paediatric outpatient and emergency department setting, sensitivities were below 92%, with specificities below 44.8%.NCT02024282.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus