Limits...
Physics at the [Formula: see text] linear collider.

Moortgat-Pick G, Baer H, Battaglia M, Belanger G, Fujii K, Kalinowski J, Heinemeyer S, Kiyo Y, Olive K, Simon F, Uwer P, Wackeroth D, Zerwas PM, Arbey A, Asano M, Bagger J, Bechtle P, Bharucha A, Brau J, Brümmer F, Choi SY, Denner A, Desch K, Dittmaier S, Ellwanger U, Englert C, Freitas A, Ginzburg I, Godfrey S, Greiner N, Grojean C, Grünewald M, Heisig J, Höcker A, Kanemura S, Kawagoe K, Kogler R, Krawczyk M, Kronfeld AS, Kroseberg J, Liebler S, List J, Mahmoudi F, Mambrini Y, Matsumoto S, Mnich J, Mönig K, Mühlleitner MM, Pöschl R, Porod W, Porto S, Rolbiecki K, Schmitt M, Serpico P, Stanitzki M, Stål O, Stefaniak T, Stöckinger D, Weiglein G, Wilson GW, Zeune L, Moortgat F, Xella S, Bagger J, Brau J, Ellis J, Kawagoe K, Komamiya S, Kronfeld AS, Mnich J, Peskin M, Schlatter D, Wagner A, Yamamoto H - Eur Phys J C Part Fields (2015)

Bottom Line: A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics.The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons.The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: II. Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany ; Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg und Zeuthen, 22603 Hamburg, Germany.

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics. The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons. The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

No MeSH data available.


as a function of  for  GeV and  including different processes as specified on the figure. Here ‘1-loop’ stands for one-loop couplings between level 2 and SM particles [1382]
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4537698&req=5

Fig153: as a function of for  GeV and including different processes as specified on the figure. Here ‘1-loop’ stands for one-loop couplings between level 2 and SM particles [1382]

Mentions: Extra dimension models also propose a WIMP DM candidate. The UED scenario [1381] where all SM particles are allowed to propagate freely in the bulk is of particular interest. In this model momentum conservation in the extra dimensions entails conservation of a KK number. Orbifolding is required to obtain chiral zero modes from bulk fermions, and this breaks extra dimensional momentum conservation. However, there remains a discrete subgroup, KK parity, thus the lightest KK-odd particle is stable. In the minimal universal extra dimension model (MUED) the DM candidate is in general a vector particle, , the Kaluza–Klein (KK) level 1 partner of the U(1) gauge boson. In the MUED model all KK states of a given level have nearly the same mass at tree level, n / R, where R is the size of the compact dimension. The mass degeneracy is lifted only by SM masses and by radiative corrections. These mass splittings are, however, small for all weakly interacting particles. This means that coannihilation channels naturally play an important role in the computation of the relic abundance of DM. Furthermore since the level 2 particles are close to twice the mass of those of level 1, annihilation or coannihilation processes can easily be enhanced by resonance effects. When including level 2 particles in the computation, the preferred scale for DM was found to be around 1.35 TeV, see line c1 in Fig. 153 [1382]. Going beyond the MUED framework one can treat mass splittings as free parameters, shifting significantly the preferred DM mass, for example in the limit where the coannihilation processes are negligible the DM mass is around 800 GeV, see line a1 in Fig. 153. The measurement of the Higgs mass and of its couplings at the LHC can be used to put a lower limit on the scale R. Indeed light KK particles, in particular the KK top, lead to an increase in the hgg coupling and to a decrease in the coupling, and to a lower bound on  GeV [1383]. One characteristic of MUED DM is that annihilation in the galaxy has a large fraction into fermions leading to strong signal into positrons, however, the large mass scale makes the signature unlikely to be observable [1384].Fig. 153


Physics at the [Formula: see text] linear collider.

Moortgat-Pick G, Baer H, Battaglia M, Belanger G, Fujii K, Kalinowski J, Heinemeyer S, Kiyo Y, Olive K, Simon F, Uwer P, Wackeroth D, Zerwas PM, Arbey A, Asano M, Bagger J, Bechtle P, Bharucha A, Brau J, Brümmer F, Choi SY, Denner A, Desch K, Dittmaier S, Ellwanger U, Englert C, Freitas A, Ginzburg I, Godfrey S, Greiner N, Grojean C, Grünewald M, Heisig J, Höcker A, Kanemura S, Kawagoe K, Kogler R, Krawczyk M, Kronfeld AS, Kroseberg J, Liebler S, List J, Mahmoudi F, Mambrini Y, Matsumoto S, Mnich J, Mönig K, Mühlleitner MM, Pöschl R, Porod W, Porto S, Rolbiecki K, Schmitt M, Serpico P, Stanitzki M, Stål O, Stefaniak T, Stöckinger D, Weiglein G, Wilson GW, Zeune L, Moortgat F, Xella S, Bagger J, Brau J, Ellis J, Kawagoe K, Komamiya S, Kronfeld AS, Mnich J, Peskin M, Schlatter D, Wagner A, Yamamoto H - Eur Phys J C Part Fields (2015)

as a function of  for  GeV and  including different processes as specified on the figure. Here ‘1-loop’ stands for one-loop couplings between level 2 and SM particles [1382]
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4537698&req=5

Fig153: as a function of for  GeV and including different processes as specified on the figure. Here ‘1-loop’ stands for one-loop couplings between level 2 and SM particles [1382]
Mentions: Extra dimension models also propose a WIMP DM candidate. The UED scenario [1381] where all SM particles are allowed to propagate freely in the bulk is of particular interest. In this model momentum conservation in the extra dimensions entails conservation of a KK number. Orbifolding is required to obtain chiral zero modes from bulk fermions, and this breaks extra dimensional momentum conservation. However, there remains a discrete subgroup, KK parity, thus the lightest KK-odd particle is stable. In the minimal universal extra dimension model (MUED) the DM candidate is in general a vector particle, , the Kaluza–Klein (KK) level 1 partner of the U(1) gauge boson. In the MUED model all KK states of a given level have nearly the same mass at tree level, n / R, where R is the size of the compact dimension. The mass degeneracy is lifted only by SM masses and by radiative corrections. These mass splittings are, however, small for all weakly interacting particles. This means that coannihilation channels naturally play an important role in the computation of the relic abundance of DM. Furthermore since the level 2 particles are close to twice the mass of those of level 1, annihilation or coannihilation processes can easily be enhanced by resonance effects. When including level 2 particles in the computation, the preferred scale for DM was found to be around 1.35 TeV, see line c1 in Fig. 153 [1382]. Going beyond the MUED framework one can treat mass splittings as free parameters, shifting significantly the preferred DM mass, for example in the limit where the coannihilation processes are negligible the DM mass is around 800 GeV, see line a1 in Fig. 153. The measurement of the Higgs mass and of its couplings at the LHC can be used to put a lower limit on the scale R. Indeed light KK particles, in particular the KK top, lead to an increase in the hgg coupling and to a decrease in the coupling, and to a lower bound on  GeV [1383]. One characteristic of MUED DM is that annihilation in the galaxy has a large fraction into fermions leading to strong signal into positrons, however, the large mass scale makes the signature unlikely to be observable [1384].Fig. 153

Bottom Line: A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics.The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons.The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: II. Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany ; Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg und Zeuthen, 22603 Hamburg, Germany.

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics. The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons. The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

No MeSH data available.