Limits...
Physics at the [Formula: see text] linear collider.

Moortgat-Pick G, Baer H, Battaglia M, Belanger G, Fujii K, Kalinowski J, Heinemeyer S, Kiyo Y, Olive K, Simon F, Uwer P, Wackeroth D, Zerwas PM, Arbey A, Asano M, Bagger J, Bechtle P, Bharucha A, Brau J, Brümmer F, Choi SY, Denner A, Desch K, Dittmaier S, Ellwanger U, Englert C, Freitas A, Ginzburg I, Godfrey S, Greiner N, Grojean C, Grünewald M, Heisig J, Höcker A, Kanemura S, Kawagoe K, Kogler R, Krawczyk M, Kronfeld AS, Kroseberg J, Liebler S, List J, Mahmoudi F, Mambrini Y, Matsumoto S, Mnich J, Mönig K, Mühlleitner MM, Pöschl R, Porod W, Porto S, Rolbiecki K, Schmitt M, Serpico P, Stanitzki M, Stål O, Stefaniak T, Stöckinger D, Weiglein G, Wilson GW, Zeune L, Moortgat F, Xella S, Bagger J, Brau J, Ellis J, Kawagoe K, Komamiya S, Kronfeld AS, Mnich J, Peskin M, Schlatter D, Wagner A, Yamamoto H - Eur Phys J C Part Fields (2015)

Bottom Line: A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics.The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons.The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: II. Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany ; Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg und Zeuthen, 22603 Hamburg, Germany.

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics. The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons. The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

profiles as a function of the Higgs mass for electroweak fits compatible with an SM Higgs boson of mass 125.8  (left) and 94  (right), respectively. The measured Higgs-boson mass is not used as input in the fit. The grey bands show the results obtained using present uncertainties [890], and the yellow bands indicate the results for the hypothetical future scenario given in Table 28 (left plot) and corresponding input data shifted to accommodate a 94  Higgs boson but unchanged uncertainties (right plot). The right axes depict the corresponding Gaussian ‘sigma’ lines. The thickness of the bands indicates the effect from the theoretical uncertainties treated according to the Rfit prescription. The long-dashed line in each plot shows the curves one would obtain when treating the theoretical uncertainties in a Gaussians manner just like any other uncertainty in the fit
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4537698&req=5

Fig116: profiles as a function of the Higgs mass for electroweak fits compatible with an SM Higgs boson of mass 125.8  (left) and 94  (right), respectively. The measured Higgs-boson mass is not used as input in the fit. The grey bands show the results obtained using present uncertainties [890], and the yellow bands indicate the results for the hypothetical future scenario given in Table 28 (left plot) and corresponding input data shifted to accommodate a 94  Higgs boson but unchanged uncertainties (right plot). The right axes depict the corresponding Gaussian ‘sigma’ lines. The thickness of the bands indicates the effect from the theoretical uncertainties treated according to the Rfit prescription. The long-dashed line in each plot shows the curves one would obtain when treating the theoretical uncertainties in a Gaussians manner just like any other uncertainty in the fit

Mentions: Profiles of as a function of the Higgs mass for present and future electroweak fits compatible with an SM Higgs boson of mass 125.8 and 94  , respectively, are shown in Fig. 116 (see caption for a detailed description). The measured Higgs-boson mass is not used as input in these fits. If the experimental input data, currently predicting  [890], were left unchanged with respect to the present values, but had uncertainties as in Table 28, a deviation of the measured exceeding could be established with the fit (see right-hand plot in Fig. 116). Such a conclusion does not strongly depend on the treatment of the theoretical uncertainties (Rfit versus Gaussian) as can be seen by comparison of the solid yellow and the long-dashed yellow profiles.


Physics at the [Formula: see text] linear collider.

Moortgat-Pick G, Baer H, Battaglia M, Belanger G, Fujii K, Kalinowski J, Heinemeyer S, Kiyo Y, Olive K, Simon F, Uwer P, Wackeroth D, Zerwas PM, Arbey A, Asano M, Bagger J, Bechtle P, Bharucha A, Brau J, Brümmer F, Choi SY, Denner A, Desch K, Dittmaier S, Ellwanger U, Englert C, Freitas A, Ginzburg I, Godfrey S, Greiner N, Grojean C, Grünewald M, Heisig J, Höcker A, Kanemura S, Kawagoe K, Kogler R, Krawczyk M, Kronfeld AS, Kroseberg J, Liebler S, List J, Mahmoudi F, Mambrini Y, Matsumoto S, Mnich J, Mönig K, Mühlleitner MM, Pöschl R, Porod W, Porto S, Rolbiecki K, Schmitt M, Serpico P, Stanitzki M, Stål O, Stefaniak T, Stöckinger D, Weiglein G, Wilson GW, Zeune L, Moortgat F, Xella S, Bagger J, Brau J, Ellis J, Kawagoe K, Komamiya S, Kronfeld AS, Mnich J, Peskin M, Schlatter D, Wagner A, Yamamoto H - Eur Phys J C Part Fields (2015)

profiles as a function of the Higgs mass for electroweak fits compatible with an SM Higgs boson of mass 125.8  (left) and 94  (right), respectively. The measured Higgs-boson mass is not used as input in the fit. The grey bands show the results obtained using present uncertainties [890], and the yellow bands indicate the results for the hypothetical future scenario given in Table 28 (left plot) and corresponding input data shifted to accommodate a 94  Higgs boson but unchanged uncertainties (right plot). The right axes depict the corresponding Gaussian ‘sigma’ lines. The thickness of the bands indicates the effect from the theoretical uncertainties treated according to the Rfit prescription. The long-dashed line in each plot shows the curves one would obtain when treating the theoretical uncertainties in a Gaussians manner just like any other uncertainty in the fit
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4537698&req=5

Fig116: profiles as a function of the Higgs mass for electroweak fits compatible with an SM Higgs boson of mass 125.8  (left) and 94  (right), respectively. The measured Higgs-boson mass is not used as input in the fit. The grey bands show the results obtained using present uncertainties [890], and the yellow bands indicate the results for the hypothetical future scenario given in Table 28 (left plot) and corresponding input data shifted to accommodate a 94  Higgs boson but unchanged uncertainties (right plot). The right axes depict the corresponding Gaussian ‘sigma’ lines. The thickness of the bands indicates the effect from the theoretical uncertainties treated according to the Rfit prescription. The long-dashed line in each plot shows the curves one would obtain when treating the theoretical uncertainties in a Gaussians manner just like any other uncertainty in the fit
Mentions: Profiles of as a function of the Higgs mass for present and future electroweak fits compatible with an SM Higgs boson of mass 125.8 and 94  , respectively, are shown in Fig. 116 (see caption for a detailed description). The measured Higgs-boson mass is not used as input in these fits. If the experimental input data, currently predicting  [890], were left unchanged with respect to the present values, but had uncertainties as in Table 28, a deviation of the measured exceeding could be established with the fit (see right-hand plot in Fig. 116). Such a conclusion does not strongly depend on the treatment of the theoretical uncertainties (Rfit versus Gaussian) as can be seen by comparison of the solid yellow and the long-dashed yellow profiles.

Bottom Line: A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics.The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons.The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: II. Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany ; Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg und Zeuthen, 22603 Hamburg, Germany.

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive review of physics at an [Formula: see text] linear collider in the energy range of [Formula: see text] GeV-3 TeV is presented in view of recent and expected LHC results, experiments from low-energy as well as astroparticle physics. The report focusses in particular on Higgs-boson, top-quark and electroweak precision physics, but also discusses several models of beyond the standard model physics such as supersymmetry, little Higgs models and extra gauge bosons. The connection to cosmology has been analysed as well.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus