Limits...
The Relationship Between Intensity Indicators in Small-Sided Soccer Games.

David C, Julen C - J Hum Kinet (2015)

Bottom Line: There was a significant moderate correlation (r=0.506) between the two internal load measurements (%HRmean and RPE).Although there were significant correlations of different degrees between various external load measurements, only the player load was significantly correlated with the internal load indicators (r=0.331 with %HRmean and r=0.218 with RPE).During training programes of this kind, it is necessary to consider a range of intensity indicators so as to obtain complementary information.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Health and Food, European University of the Atlantic, Santander, Spain.

ABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between different kinds of intensity indicators in small-sided soccer games. This descriptive correlational study included 14 semi-professional male soccer players (21.3 ± 2.3 years, 174 ± 4.0 cm, 73.4 ± 5.1 kg) from the same team. The players were monitored by means of heart rate monitors and GPS devices during 27 small-sided games of nine different formats, yielding a total of 217 recordings. After each game the Borg scale was used to give a rate of perceived exertion (RPE). The internal load indicators were the mean heart rate relative to the individual maximum (%HRmean) and the RPE, while those for the external load were the player load, total distance covered, distance covered in two intensity ranges (>18 km·h-1 and >21 km·h-1), and frequency of effort (in the same two intensity ranges). There was a significant moderate correlation (r=0.506) between the two internal load measurements (%HRmean and RPE). Although there were significant correlations of different degrees between various external load measurements, only the player load was significantly correlated with the internal load indicators (r=0.331 with %HRmean and r=0.218 with RPE). During training programes of this kind, it is necessary to consider a range of intensity indicators so as to obtain complementary information. This will enable coaches to more accurately assess the load imposed on players and therefore optimize the training process.

No MeSH data available.


The mean heart rate (%) corresponding to each point score on the scale used to measure the RPE (n = 217). Bar heights are mean values and error bars are SD values.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4519202&req=5

f1-jhk-46-119: The mean heart rate (%) corresponding to each point score on the scale used to measure the RPE (n = 217). Bar heights are mean values and error bars are SD values.

Mentions: The mean values obtained for the intensity indicators associated with the internal load were 84.6% (±4.3) for %HRmean and 3.8 AU (±1.0) for the RPE. The mean TD during the SSG was 118.3 m·min-1 (±18.7), while the mean PL was 15.8 AU·min-1 (±2.7). In terms of the distance covered in the two intensity ranges, mean DHS was 5.5 m·min-1 (±4.7) and mean DSS was 1.5 m·min-1 (±2.4). The two indicators of the internal load (%HRmean and RPE) were strongly correlated with one another (r=0.506, p<0.001; Figure 1).


The Relationship Between Intensity Indicators in Small-Sided Soccer Games.

David C, Julen C - J Hum Kinet (2015)

The mean heart rate (%) corresponding to each point score on the scale used to measure the RPE (n = 217). Bar heights are mean values and error bars are SD values.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4519202&req=5

f1-jhk-46-119: The mean heart rate (%) corresponding to each point score on the scale used to measure the RPE (n = 217). Bar heights are mean values and error bars are SD values.
Mentions: The mean values obtained for the intensity indicators associated with the internal load were 84.6% (±4.3) for %HRmean and 3.8 AU (±1.0) for the RPE. The mean TD during the SSG was 118.3 m·min-1 (±18.7), while the mean PL was 15.8 AU·min-1 (±2.7). In terms of the distance covered in the two intensity ranges, mean DHS was 5.5 m·min-1 (±4.7) and mean DSS was 1.5 m·min-1 (±2.4). The two indicators of the internal load (%HRmean and RPE) were strongly correlated with one another (r=0.506, p<0.001; Figure 1).

Bottom Line: There was a significant moderate correlation (r=0.506) between the two internal load measurements (%HRmean and RPE).Although there were significant correlations of different degrees between various external load measurements, only the player load was significantly correlated with the internal load indicators (r=0.331 with %HRmean and r=0.218 with RPE).During training programes of this kind, it is necessary to consider a range of intensity indicators so as to obtain complementary information.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Health and Food, European University of the Atlantic, Santander, Spain.

ABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between different kinds of intensity indicators in small-sided soccer games. This descriptive correlational study included 14 semi-professional male soccer players (21.3 ± 2.3 years, 174 ± 4.0 cm, 73.4 ± 5.1 kg) from the same team. The players were monitored by means of heart rate monitors and GPS devices during 27 small-sided games of nine different formats, yielding a total of 217 recordings. After each game the Borg scale was used to give a rate of perceived exertion (RPE). The internal load indicators were the mean heart rate relative to the individual maximum (%HRmean) and the RPE, while those for the external load were the player load, total distance covered, distance covered in two intensity ranges (>18 km·h-1 and >21 km·h-1), and frequency of effort (in the same two intensity ranges). There was a significant moderate correlation (r=0.506) between the two internal load measurements (%HRmean and RPE). Although there were significant correlations of different degrees between various external load measurements, only the player load was significantly correlated with the internal load indicators (r=0.331 with %HRmean and r=0.218 with RPE). During training programes of this kind, it is necessary to consider a range of intensity indicators so as to obtain complementary information. This will enable coaches to more accurately assess the load imposed on players and therefore optimize the training process.

No MeSH data available.