Limits...
Combination therapy of varenicline with nicotine replacement therapy is better than varenicline alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chang PH, Chiang CH, Ho WC, Wu PZ, Tsai JS, Guo FR - BMC Public Health (2015)

Bottom Line: One study reported more skin reactions (14.4 % vs 7.8 %; p = 0.03) associated with combination therapy.Combination therapy is more effective than varenicline alone, especially if pre-cessation treatment of nicotine patch is administrated.Adverse events of combination therapy are similar to mono-therapy except for skin reactions.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10016, Taiwan. beansheep@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT

Background: Smoking is a major preventable cause of morbidity and premature death worldwide. Both varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) help achieve smoking cessation. However, limited evidence exists regarding whether combination of varenicline and NRT is more effective than either alone. The aim of this research was to investigate the efficacy and safety of varenicline combined with NRT.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library was conducted in November 2014. Two authors independently reviewed and selected randomized controlled trials. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Jadad score. We carried out meta-analysis of both early (abstinence rate assessed before or at the end of treatment) and late (assessed after the end of the treatment) outcomes.

Results: Three randomized controlled trials with 904 participants were included in this meta-analysis. All three were comparing combination therapy with varenicline therapy alone. The late outcomes were assessed in 2 of the 3 trials. Both the early and late outcomes were favorable for combination therapy (OR = 1.50, 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.97; OR = 1.62, 95 % CI 1.18 to 2.23, respectively). However, this significance diminished after eliminating a study with pre-cessation treatment using nicotine patch. The most common adverse events were nausea, insomnia, abnormal dreams, and headache. One study reported more skin reactions (14.4 % vs 7.8 %; p = 0.03) associated with combination therapy.

Conclusions: Combination therapy is more effective than varenicline alone, especially if pre-cessation treatment of nicotine patch is administrated. Adverse events of combination therapy are similar to mono-therapy except for skin reactions.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Flow diagram of meta-analysis: inclusion and exclusion of studies
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4508997&req=5

Fig1: Flow diagram of meta-analysis: inclusion and exclusion of studies

Mentions: The search strategy retrieved a total of 63 citations. Of these, three were appropriate for full-text review (Fig. 1). No additional study was identified after searching the reference lists of these three articles. After review, all three studies [9–11] were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (Table 1). These three studies were all combination therapy versus varenicline alone therapy trials.Fig. 1


Combination therapy of varenicline with nicotine replacement therapy is better than varenicline alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chang PH, Chiang CH, Ho WC, Wu PZ, Tsai JS, Guo FR - BMC Public Health (2015)

Flow diagram of meta-analysis: inclusion and exclusion of studies
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4508997&req=5

Fig1: Flow diagram of meta-analysis: inclusion and exclusion of studies
Mentions: The search strategy retrieved a total of 63 citations. Of these, three were appropriate for full-text review (Fig. 1). No additional study was identified after searching the reference lists of these three articles. After review, all three studies [9–11] were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (Table 1). These three studies were all combination therapy versus varenicline alone therapy trials.Fig. 1

Bottom Line: One study reported more skin reactions (14.4 % vs 7.8 %; p = 0.03) associated with combination therapy.Combination therapy is more effective than varenicline alone, especially if pre-cessation treatment of nicotine patch is administrated.Adverse events of combination therapy are similar to mono-therapy except for skin reactions.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10016, Taiwan. beansheep@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT

Background: Smoking is a major preventable cause of morbidity and premature death worldwide. Both varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) help achieve smoking cessation. However, limited evidence exists regarding whether combination of varenicline and NRT is more effective than either alone. The aim of this research was to investigate the efficacy and safety of varenicline combined with NRT.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library was conducted in November 2014. Two authors independently reviewed and selected randomized controlled trials. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Jadad score. We carried out meta-analysis of both early (abstinence rate assessed before or at the end of treatment) and late (assessed after the end of the treatment) outcomes.

Results: Three randomized controlled trials with 904 participants were included in this meta-analysis. All three were comparing combination therapy with varenicline therapy alone. The late outcomes were assessed in 2 of the 3 trials. Both the early and late outcomes were favorable for combination therapy (OR = 1.50, 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.97; OR = 1.62, 95 % CI 1.18 to 2.23, respectively). However, this significance diminished after eliminating a study with pre-cessation treatment using nicotine patch. The most common adverse events were nausea, insomnia, abnormal dreams, and headache. One study reported more skin reactions (14.4 % vs 7.8 %; p = 0.03) associated with combination therapy.

Conclusions: Combination therapy is more effective than varenicline alone, especially if pre-cessation treatment of nicotine patch is administrated. Adverse events of combination therapy are similar to mono-therapy except for skin reactions.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus