Limits...
To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Jayaram M, Bodart AY, Sampson S, Zhao S, Montgomery AA, Adams CE - BMJ Open (2015)

Bottom Line: The intervention group will have three tweets daily using Hootsuite with a slightly different accompanying text (written by CEA and AB) and a shortened Uniform Resource Locator (URL) to the PLS: a) The review title as it appears in summaries.cochrane.org, b) A pertinent extract from results or discussion sections of the abstract and c) An intriguing question or pithy statement related to the evidence in the abstract.This study does not involve living participants, and uses information available in the public domain.ISRCTN84658943.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Example of the three tweets relating to the same review.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4499712&req=5

BMJOPEN2015007695F2: Example of the three tweets relating to the same review.

Mentions: An example of this is outlined in figure 2.


To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Jayaram M, Bodart AY, Sampson S, Zhao S, Montgomery AA, Adams CE - BMJ Open (2015)

Example of the three tweets relating to the same review.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4499712&req=5

BMJOPEN2015007695F2: Example of the three tweets relating to the same review.
Mentions: An example of this is outlined in figure 2.

Bottom Line: The intervention group will have three tweets daily using Hootsuite with a slightly different accompanying text (written by CEA and AB) and a shortened Uniform Resource Locator (URL) to the PLS: a) The review title as it appears in summaries.cochrane.org, b) A pertinent extract from results or discussion sections of the abstract and c) An intriguing question or pithy statement related to the evidence in the abstract.This study does not involve living participants, and uses information available in the public domain.ISRCTN84658943.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus