Limits...
Will Trespassers Be Prosecuted or Assessed According to Their Merits? A Consilient Interpretation of Territoriality in a Group-Living Carnivore, the European Badger (Meles meles).

Tinnesand HV, Buesching CD, Noonan MJ, Newman C, Zedrosser A, Rosell F, Macdonald DW - PLoS ONE (2015)

Bottom Line: There were no age-class related differences in sniff-duration or in over-marking.Evaluating these results in the context of the Familiarity hypothesis, the Threat-level hypothesis, and the Individual advertisement hypothesis evidences that interpretations of territorial scent-marks depicting rigid and potentially agonistic discrimination between own- and foreign-group conspecifics are overly simplistic.We use our findings to advance conceptual understanding of badger socio-spatial ecology, and the general context of territoriality and group-range dynamics.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Environmental and Health Studies, Telemark University College, N-3800 Bø i Telemark, Norway.

ABSTRACT
Socio-spatial interactions of Carnivores have traditionally been described using the vocabulary of territoriality and aggression, with scent marks interpreted as 'scent fences'. Here, we investigate the role of olfactory signals in assumed territorial marking of group-living solitary foragers using European badgers Meles meles as a model. We presented anal gland secretions (n = 351) from known individuals to identifiable recipients (n = 187), to assess response-variation according to familiarity (own-group, neighbours, strangers) and spatial context (in-context: at a shared border; out-of-context: at an unshared border/ the main sett). Sniffing and over-marking (with subcaudal gland secretion) responses were strongest to anal gland secretions from strangers, intermediate to neighbouring-group and weakest to own-group members. Secretions from both, strangers and neighbours, were sniffed for longer than were own-group samples, although neighbour-secretion presented out-of-context evoked no greater interest than in-context. On an individual level, responses were further moderated by the relevance of individual-specific donor information encoded in the secretion, as it related to the physiological state of the responder. There was a trend bordering on significance for males to sniff for longer than did females, but without sex-related differences in the frequency of subcaudal over-marking responses, and males over-marked oestrous female secretions more than non-oestrous females. There were no age-class related differences in sniff-duration or in over-marking. Evaluating these results in the context of the Familiarity hypothesis, the Threat-level hypothesis, and the Individual advertisement hypothesis evidences that interpretations of territorial scent-marks depicting rigid and potentially agonistic discrimination between own- and foreign-group conspecifics are overly simplistic. We use our findings to advance conceptual understanding of badger socio-spatial ecology, and the general context of territoriality and group-range dynamics.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Group-level variation in responses to AGS from donors of different levels of familiarity.Mean (±SD) group level (a) duration of sniffing responses in seconds; and (b) number of subcaudal-marking responses per potential response to AGS from own–group (n = 20 trials), neighbours (n = 35) and strangers (n = 30) presented at either the responding group’s sett, or a border (shared or unshared) between the responding group and the scent donor.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4493095&req=5

pone.0132432.g001: Group-level variation in responses to AGS from donors of different levels of familiarity.Mean (±SD) group level (a) duration of sniffing responses in seconds; and (b) number of subcaudal-marking responses per potential response to AGS from own–group (n = 20 trials), neighbours (n = 35) and strangers (n = 30) presented at either the responding group’s sett, or a border (shared or unshared) between the responding group and the scent donor.

Mentions: Cumulative group-responses to introduced scent were stronger when AGS was less familiar (weakest to OG-AGS, with intermediate responses to neighbouring-group samples, and strongest to stranger-AGS). The duration of sniffing responses at the group-level differed significantly between all levels of familiarity (ANOVA: F2,67 = 14.17, P< 0.0001; Tukey post hoc test: all P-values < 0.027; Fig 1A), and were longer in response to AGS from both strangers ( = 4.29s ± 2.60 SD, n = 32), and neighbours ( = 2.71s ± 2.56 SD, n = 33), than to OG ( = 1.44s ± 2.58 SD, n = 19). Similarly, over-marking responses differed significantly between all levels of familiarity (ANOVA: F2,67 = 15.45, P < 0.0001; Tukey post hoc test: all P-values < 0.03; Fig 1B), and were more frequent to AGS from both strangers ( = 0.77 ± 0.51 SD, n = 32), and neighbours ( = 0.48 ± 0.50 SD, n = 33), compared to OG-AGS ( = 0.07 ± 0.50 SD, n = 19).


Will Trespassers Be Prosecuted or Assessed According to Their Merits? A Consilient Interpretation of Territoriality in a Group-Living Carnivore, the European Badger (Meles meles).

Tinnesand HV, Buesching CD, Noonan MJ, Newman C, Zedrosser A, Rosell F, Macdonald DW - PLoS ONE (2015)

Group-level variation in responses to AGS from donors of different levels of familiarity.Mean (±SD) group level (a) duration of sniffing responses in seconds; and (b) number of subcaudal-marking responses per potential response to AGS from own–group (n = 20 trials), neighbours (n = 35) and strangers (n = 30) presented at either the responding group’s sett, or a border (shared or unshared) between the responding group and the scent donor.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4493095&req=5

pone.0132432.g001: Group-level variation in responses to AGS from donors of different levels of familiarity.Mean (±SD) group level (a) duration of sniffing responses in seconds; and (b) number of subcaudal-marking responses per potential response to AGS from own–group (n = 20 trials), neighbours (n = 35) and strangers (n = 30) presented at either the responding group’s sett, or a border (shared or unshared) between the responding group and the scent donor.
Mentions: Cumulative group-responses to introduced scent were stronger when AGS was less familiar (weakest to OG-AGS, with intermediate responses to neighbouring-group samples, and strongest to stranger-AGS). The duration of sniffing responses at the group-level differed significantly between all levels of familiarity (ANOVA: F2,67 = 14.17, P< 0.0001; Tukey post hoc test: all P-values < 0.027; Fig 1A), and were longer in response to AGS from both strangers ( = 4.29s ± 2.60 SD, n = 32), and neighbours ( = 2.71s ± 2.56 SD, n = 33), than to OG ( = 1.44s ± 2.58 SD, n = 19). Similarly, over-marking responses differed significantly between all levels of familiarity (ANOVA: F2,67 = 15.45, P < 0.0001; Tukey post hoc test: all P-values < 0.03; Fig 1B), and were more frequent to AGS from both strangers ( = 0.77 ± 0.51 SD, n = 32), and neighbours ( = 0.48 ± 0.50 SD, n = 33), compared to OG-AGS ( = 0.07 ± 0.50 SD, n = 19).

Bottom Line: There were no age-class related differences in sniff-duration or in over-marking.Evaluating these results in the context of the Familiarity hypothesis, the Threat-level hypothesis, and the Individual advertisement hypothesis evidences that interpretations of territorial scent-marks depicting rigid and potentially agonistic discrimination between own- and foreign-group conspecifics are overly simplistic.We use our findings to advance conceptual understanding of badger socio-spatial ecology, and the general context of territoriality and group-range dynamics.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Environmental and Health Studies, Telemark University College, N-3800 Bø i Telemark, Norway.

ABSTRACT
Socio-spatial interactions of Carnivores have traditionally been described using the vocabulary of territoriality and aggression, with scent marks interpreted as 'scent fences'. Here, we investigate the role of olfactory signals in assumed territorial marking of group-living solitary foragers using European badgers Meles meles as a model. We presented anal gland secretions (n = 351) from known individuals to identifiable recipients (n = 187), to assess response-variation according to familiarity (own-group, neighbours, strangers) and spatial context (in-context: at a shared border; out-of-context: at an unshared border/ the main sett). Sniffing and over-marking (with subcaudal gland secretion) responses were strongest to anal gland secretions from strangers, intermediate to neighbouring-group and weakest to own-group members. Secretions from both, strangers and neighbours, were sniffed for longer than were own-group samples, although neighbour-secretion presented out-of-context evoked no greater interest than in-context. On an individual level, responses were further moderated by the relevance of individual-specific donor information encoded in the secretion, as it related to the physiological state of the responder. There was a trend bordering on significance for males to sniff for longer than did females, but without sex-related differences in the frequency of subcaudal over-marking responses, and males over-marked oestrous female secretions more than non-oestrous females. There were no age-class related differences in sniff-duration or in over-marking. Evaluating these results in the context of the Familiarity hypothesis, the Threat-level hypothesis, and the Individual advertisement hypothesis evidences that interpretations of territorial scent-marks depicting rigid and potentially agonistic discrimination between own- and foreign-group conspecifics are overly simplistic. We use our findings to advance conceptual understanding of badger socio-spatial ecology, and the general context of territoriality and group-range dynamics.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus