Limits...
Improving district facility readiness: a 12-month evaluation of a data-driven health systems strengthening intervention in rural Rwanda.

Iyer HS, Kamanzi E, Mugunga JC, Finnegan K, Uwingabiye A, Shyaka E, Niyonzima S, Hirschhorn LR, Drobac PC - Glob Health Action (2015)

Bottom Line: Composite score across domains improved from 6.2 at baseline to 7.4 at 12 months (p=0.002).Across facilities, 50% had composite scores greater than the average score among reference facilities (7.4) at 12 months compared to none at baseline.This approach can achieve effective use of limited resources, improve facility readiness, and ensure consistency of facility capacity to provide quality care at the district level.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.

ABSTRACT

Background: While health systems strengthening (HSS) interventions are recommended by global health policy experts to improve population health in resource-limited settings, few examples exist of evaluations of HSS interventions conducted at the district level. In 2009, a partnership between Partners In Health (PIH), a non-governmental organization, and the Rwandan Ministry of Health (RMOH) was provided funds to implement and evaluate a district-level HSS intervention in two rural districts of Rwanda.

Design: The partnership provided limited funds to 14 health centers for targeted systems support in 2010; six others received support prior to the intervention (reference). RMOH health systems norms were mapped across the WHO HSS framework, scored from 0 to 10 and incorporated into a rapid survey assessing 11 domains of facility readiness. Stakeholder meetings allowed partnership leaders to review results, set priorities, and allocate resources. Investments included salary support, infrastructure improvements, medical equipment, and social support for patients. We compared facility domain scores from the start of the intervention to 12 months and tested for correlation between change in score and change in funding allocation to assess equity in our approach.

Results: We found significant improvements among intervention facilities from baseline to 12 months across several domains [infrastructure (+4, p=0.0001), clinical services (+1.2, p=0.03), infection and sanitation control (+0.6, p=0.03), medical equipment (+1.0, p=0.02), information use (+2, p=0.002)]. Composite score across domains improved from 6.2 at baseline to 7.4 at 12 months (p=0.002). Across facilities, 50% had composite scores greater than the average score among reference facilities (7.4) at 12 months compared to none at baseline.

Conclusions: Rapid facility surveys, stakeholder engagement, and information feedback can be used for gap analysis and resource allocation. This approach can achieve effective use of limited resources, improve facility readiness, and ensure consistency of facility capacity to provide quality care at the district level.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Sustainability in Facility Readiness Improvement among Intervention Facilities (N=14) after 36 months.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4490804&req=5

Figure 0002: Sustainability in Facility Readiness Improvement among Intervention Facilities (N=14) after 36 months.

Mentions: Despite a slight decline in overall health center funding, composite scores increased from baseline to 12 months at the 14 intervention health centers (difference = 1.2, p=0.002). Multiple domain scores also showed significant improvement in the intervention facilities (infrastructure: 4.0, p=0.001; clinical services: 1.2, p=0.03; infection and sanitation control: 0.6, p=0.03; medical equipment: 1.0, p=0.02; M&E: 2.0, p=0.002) (Table 2). Across the 14 intervention health centers, 50% had composite scores greater than the average score among reference facilities (7.4) at 12 months; none of the intervention health centers had a higher composite score at baseline. Improvements remained relatively stable at 24 months and 36 months (Fig. 2). At 24 months, the composite score for intervention facilities increased to 7.8 and at 36 months, the composite score was 7.6.


Improving district facility readiness: a 12-month evaluation of a data-driven health systems strengthening intervention in rural Rwanda.

Iyer HS, Kamanzi E, Mugunga JC, Finnegan K, Uwingabiye A, Shyaka E, Niyonzima S, Hirschhorn LR, Drobac PC - Glob Health Action (2015)

Sustainability in Facility Readiness Improvement among Intervention Facilities (N=14) after 36 months.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4490804&req=5

Figure 0002: Sustainability in Facility Readiness Improvement among Intervention Facilities (N=14) after 36 months.
Mentions: Despite a slight decline in overall health center funding, composite scores increased from baseline to 12 months at the 14 intervention health centers (difference = 1.2, p=0.002). Multiple domain scores also showed significant improvement in the intervention facilities (infrastructure: 4.0, p=0.001; clinical services: 1.2, p=0.03; infection and sanitation control: 0.6, p=0.03; medical equipment: 1.0, p=0.02; M&E: 2.0, p=0.002) (Table 2). Across the 14 intervention health centers, 50% had composite scores greater than the average score among reference facilities (7.4) at 12 months; none of the intervention health centers had a higher composite score at baseline. Improvements remained relatively stable at 24 months and 36 months (Fig. 2). At 24 months, the composite score for intervention facilities increased to 7.8 and at 36 months, the composite score was 7.6.

Bottom Line: Composite score across domains improved from 6.2 at baseline to 7.4 at 12 months (p=0.002).Across facilities, 50% had composite scores greater than the average score among reference facilities (7.4) at 12 months compared to none at baseline.This approach can achieve effective use of limited resources, improve facility readiness, and ensure consistency of facility capacity to provide quality care at the district level.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.

ABSTRACT

Background: While health systems strengthening (HSS) interventions are recommended by global health policy experts to improve population health in resource-limited settings, few examples exist of evaluations of HSS interventions conducted at the district level. In 2009, a partnership between Partners In Health (PIH), a non-governmental organization, and the Rwandan Ministry of Health (RMOH) was provided funds to implement and evaluate a district-level HSS intervention in two rural districts of Rwanda.

Design: The partnership provided limited funds to 14 health centers for targeted systems support in 2010; six others received support prior to the intervention (reference). RMOH health systems norms were mapped across the WHO HSS framework, scored from 0 to 10 and incorporated into a rapid survey assessing 11 domains of facility readiness. Stakeholder meetings allowed partnership leaders to review results, set priorities, and allocate resources. Investments included salary support, infrastructure improvements, medical equipment, and social support for patients. We compared facility domain scores from the start of the intervention to 12 months and tested for correlation between change in score and change in funding allocation to assess equity in our approach.

Results: We found significant improvements among intervention facilities from baseline to 12 months across several domains [infrastructure (+4, p=0.0001), clinical services (+1.2, p=0.03), infection and sanitation control (+0.6, p=0.03), medical equipment (+1.0, p=0.02), information use (+2, p=0.002)]. Composite score across domains improved from 6.2 at baseline to 7.4 at 12 months (p=0.002). Across facilities, 50% had composite scores greater than the average score among reference facilities (7.4) at 12 months compared to none at baseline.

Conclusions: Rapid facility surveys, stakeholder engagement, and information feedback can be used for gap analysis and resource allocation. This approach can achieve effective use of limited resources, improve facility readiness, and ensure consistency of facility capacity to provide quality care at the district level.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus