Limits...
Computer-Based Cognitive Programs for Improvement of Memory, Processing Speed and Executive Function during Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Meta-Analysis.

Shao YK, Mang J, Li PL, Wang J, Deng T, Xu ZX - PLoS ONE (2015)

Bottom Line: The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of a random-effects model were calculated.The aggregated results indicate that CCP improves memory performance (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45; p < 0.0001) and processing speed (SMD, 0.50; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.87; p = 0.007) but not executive function (SMD, -0.12; 95% CI -0.33 to 0.09; p = 0.27).However, more studies with longer follow-ups are warranted to confirm the current findings.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

ABSTRACT

Background: Several studies have assessed the effects of computer-based cognitive programs (CCP) in the management of age-related cognitive decline, but the role of CCP remains controversial. Therefore, this systematic review evaluated the evidence on the efficacy of CCP for age-related cognitive decline in healthy older adults.

Methods: Six electronic databases (through October 2014) were searched. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of a random-effects model were calculated. The heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q statistic and quantified with the I2 index.

Results: Twelve studies were included in the current review and were considered as moderate to high methodological quality. The aggregated results indicate that CCP improves memory performance (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45; p < 0.0001) and processing speed (SMD, 0.50; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.87; p = 0.007) but not executive function (SMD, -0.12; 95% CI -0.33 to 0.09; p = 0.27). Furthermore, there were long-term gains in memory performance (SMD, 0.59; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.05; p = 0.01).

Conclusion: CCP may be a valid complementary and alternative therapy for age-related cognitive decline, especially for memory performance and processing speed. However, more studies with longer follow-ups are warranted to confirm the current findings.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Forest plot of the effect of computer-based cognitive programs in memory performance.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4476706&req=5

pone.0130831.g003: Forest plot of the effect of computer-based cognitive programs in memory performance.

Mentions: Memory is the ability to retain, store and recall information. Age-related memory loss is a universal condition for older adults. In total, 10 studies [14–18,22–25,27] assessed the effect of CCP in memory performance. The aggregated results indicated that CCP improved memory performance (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45; p < 0.0001, Fig 3) compared to the control interventions. In the subgroup meta-analyses, CCP demonstrated significant effects in digit span (SMD, 0.54; 95% CI 0.03 to 1.06; p = 0.04, Fig 3) [14–16,18,22,25], letter-number sequencing (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.40; p < 0.00001, Fig 3) [22,24,25] and over memory (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.41; p < 0.0001, Fig 3) [22,25]. CCP were also associated with small but not significant improvements in delayed recall (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.34; p = 0.06, Fig 3) [22,23,25,27] or immediate recall (SMD, 0.19; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.44; p = 0.18, Fig 3) [22,23,25].


Computer-Based Cognitive Programs for Improvement of Memory, Processing Speed and Executive Function during Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Meta-Analysis.

Shao YK, Mang J, Li PL, Wang J, Deng T, Xu ZX - PLoS ONE (2015)

Forest plot of the effect of computer-based cognitive programs in memory performance.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4476706&req=5

pone.0130831.g003: Forest plot of the effect of computer-based cognitive programs in memory performance.
Mentions: Memory is the ability to retain, store and recall information. Age-related memory loss is a universal condition for older adults. In total, 10 studies [14–18,22–25,27] assessed the effect of CCP in memory performance. The aggregated results indicated that CCP improved memory performance (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45; p < 0.0001, Fig 3) compared to the control interventions. In the subgroup meta-analyses, CCP demonstrated significant effects in digit span (SMD, 0.54; 95% CI 0.03 to 1.06; p = 0.04, Fig 3) [14–16,18,22,25], letter-number sequencing (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.40; p < 0.00001, Fig 3) [22,24,25] and over memory (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.41; p < 0.0001, Fig 3) [22,25]. CCP were also associated with small but not significant improvements in delayed recall (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.34; p = 0.06, Fig 3) [22,23,25,27] or immediate recall (SMD, 0.19; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.44; p = 0.18, Fig 3) [22,23,25].

Bottom Line: The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of a random-effects model were calculated.The aggregated results indicate that CCP improves memory performance (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45; p < 0.0001) and processing speed (SMD, 0.50; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.87; p = 0.007) but not executive function (SMD, -0.12; 95% CI -0.33 to 0.09; p = 0.27).However, more studies with longer follow-ups are warranted to confirm the current findings.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

ABSTRACT

Background: Several studies have assessed the effects of computer-based cognitive programs (CCP) in the management of age-related cognitive decline, but the role of CCP remains controversial. Therefore, this systematic review evaluated the evidence on the efficacy of CCP for age-related cognitive decline in healthy older adults.

Methods: Six electronic databases (through October 2014) were searched. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of a random-effects model were calculated. The heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q statistic and quantified with the I2 index.

Results: Twelve studies were included in the current review and were considered as moderate to high methodological quality. The aggregated results indicate that CCP improves memory performance (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45; p < 0.0001) and processing speed (SMD, 0.50; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.87; p = 0.007) but not executive function (SMD, -0.12; 95% CI -0.33 to 0.09; p = 0.27). Furthermore, there were long-term gains in memory performance (SMD, 0.59; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.05; p = 0.01).

Conclusion: CCP may be a valid complementary and alternative therapy for age-related cognitive decline, especially for memory performance and processing speed. However, more studies with longer follow-ups are warranted to confirm the current findings.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus