Limits...
Differing Dynamics of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Coordination: Two-finger and Four-Finger Tapping Experiments.

Kodama K, Furuyama N, Inamura T - PLoS ONE (2015)

Bottom Line: This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems.Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions.Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Kanagawa University, 3-27-1, Rokkakubashi, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan.

ABSTRACT
Finger-tapping experiments were conducted to examine whether the dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems can be described equally by the Haken-Kelso-Bunz model, which describes inter-limb coordination dynamics. This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems. Two within-subject factors were investigated: the phase mode and the number of fingers. In the intrapersonal experiment (Experiment 1), the participants were asked to tap, paced by a gradually hastening auditory metronome, looking at their fingers moving, using the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. In the interpersonal experiment (Experiment 2), pairs of participants performed the task while each participant used the outside hand, tapping with the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions. First, from Experiment 1, no significant difference was observed in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase modes in the two finger condition. Second, from Experiment 2, no significant difference was found in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase mode in the four-finger condition. From these findings, different coordination dynamics were inferred between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems against prediction from the previous studies. Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Cross recurrence plots.Cross recurrence plots of sample data for each of four conditions. Left-top, two-finger in-phase condition; Right-top, two-finger anti-phase condition; Left-bottom, four-finger in-phase condition; Right-bottom, four-finger anti-phase condition.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4466560&req=5

pone.0129358.g006: Cross recurrence plots.Cross recurrence plots of sample data for each of four conditions. Left-top, two-finger in-phase condition; Right-top, two-finger anti-phase condition; Left-bottom, four-finger in-phase condition; Right-bottom, four-finger anti-phase condition.

Mentions: Fig 6 represents cross recurrence plots of sample data for each of four conditions and Fig 7 presents %RECI for each condition as a function of frequency.


Differing Dynamics of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Coordination: Two-finger and Four-Finger Tapping Experiments.

Kodama K, Furuyama N, Inamura T - PLoS ONE (2015)

Cross recurrence plots.Cross recurrence plots of sample data for each of four conditions. Left-top, two-finger in-phase condition; Right-top, two-finger anti-phase condition; Left-bottom, four-finger in-phase condition; Right-bottom, four-finger anti-phase condition.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4466560&req=5

pone.0129358.g006: Cross recurrence plots.Cross recurrence plots of sample data for each of four conditions. Left-top, two-finger in-phase condition; Right-top, two-finger anti-phase condition; Left-bottom, four-finger in-phase condition; Right-bottom, four-finger anti-phase condition.
Mentions: Fig 6 represents cross recurrence plots of sample data for each of four conditions and Fig 7 presents %RECI for each condition as a function of frequency.

Bottom Line: This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems.Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions.Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Kanagawa University, 3-27-1, Rokkakubashi, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan.

ABSTRACT
Finger-tapping experiments were conducted to examine whether the dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems can be described equally by the Haken-Kelso-Bunz model, which describes inter-limb coordination dynamics. This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems. Two within-subject factors were investigated: the phase mode and the number of fingers. In the intrapersonal experiment (Experiment 1), the participants were asked to tap, paced by a gradually hastening auditory metronome, looking at their fingers moving, using the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. In the interpersonal experiment (Experiment 2), pairs of participants performed the task while each participant used the outside hand, tapping with the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions. First, from Experiment 1, no significant difference was observed in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase modes in the two finger condition. Second, from Experiment 2, no significant difference was found in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase mode in the four-finger condition. From these findings, different coordination dynamics were inferred between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems against prediction from the previous studies. Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus