Limits...
Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake.

Gidlow C, Ellis N, Randall J, Cowap L, Smith G, Iqbal Z, Kumar J - J Public Health (Oxf) (2014)

Bottom Line: Attendance/non-attendance was the binary outcome variable.Telephone/verbal invitations were associated with higher uptake than postal invitations (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.26-3.64), yet significant practice-level variation remained.Distance to Health Check was not associated with attendance.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Centre for Research in Sport, Health and Exercise, Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent ST4 2DF, UK.

No MeSH data available.


Distance to practice in attenders and non-attenders, overall and by practice.
© Copyright Policy - creative-commons
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4447133&req=5

FDU092F2: Distance to practice in attenders and non-attenders, overall and by practice.

Mentions: Mean distance to practice was 2.41 ± 1.73 km (∼1.4 miles), ranging from 0 (same postcode area) to 12.3 km (∼7.7 miles). This varied significantly by practice (Kruskal–Wallis test-statistic = 333.27(4), P < 0.001), but not between attenders and non-attenders (Mann–Whitney U = 2 633 331, Z = −1.41, P = 0.157; Fig. 2).Fig. 2


Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake.

Gidlow C, Ellis N, Randall J, Cowap L, Smith G, Iqbal Z, Kumar J - J Public Health (Oxf) (2014)

Distance to practice in attenders and non-attenders, overall and by practice.
© Copyright Policy - creative-commons
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4447133&req=5

FDU092F2: Distance to practice in attenders and non-attenders, overall and by practice.
Mentions: Mean distance to practice was 2.41 ± 1.73 km (∼1.4 miles), ranging from 0 (same postcode area) to 12.3 km (∼7.7 miles). This varied significantly by practice (Kruskal–Wallis test-statistic = 333.27(4), P < 0.001), but not between attenders and non-attenders (Mann–Whitney U = 2 633 331, Z = −1.41, P = 0.157; Fig. 2).Fig. 2

Bottom Line: Attendance/non-attendance was the binary outcome variable.Telephone/verbal invitations were associated with higher uptake than postal invitations (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.26-3.64), yet significant practice-level variation remained.Distance to Health Check was not associated with attendance.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Centre for Research in Sport, Health and Exercise, Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent ST4 2DF, UK.

No MeSH data available.