Limits...
Hip decompression of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ibrahim T, Mahmoud S, Riaz M, Hegazy A, Little DG - J Child Orthop (2015)

Bottom Line: Unstable SCFE is characterized by sudden and severe hip pain with the inability to weight bear, even with crutches.Thus, multicenter prospective cohort studies are required and will be able to answer this question with more certainty and a higher level of evidence.Level III/IV.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar, tibrahim.ortho@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common adolescent hip conditions. Unstable SCFE is characterized by sudden and severe hip pain with the inability to weight bear, even with crutches. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is increased in patients with unstable SCFE. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature that compares hip decompression to no hip decompression of unstable SCFE.

Methods: We searched several databases from 1946 to 2014 for any observational or experimental studies that evaluated hip decompression and osteonecrosis of unstable SCFE. We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model to pool odds ratios (ORs) for the comparison of osteonecrosis between patients undergoing hip decompression and no hip decompression. We also investigated the type of hip decompression performed. Descriptive, quantitative, and qualitative data were extracted.

Results: Of the 17 articles identified, nine studies (eight case series and one retrospective cohort study) were eligible for the meta-analysis, with a total of 302 unstable SCFE. The pooled OR = 0.91 of osteonecrosis between hip decompression and no hip decompression was in favor of hip decompression, but was not statistically significant [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.47, 1.75; p = 0.54, I (2) = 0 %]. No significant differences in the rates of osteonecrosis were detected in unstable SCFE with open and percutaneous hip decompression alone (OR = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.36, 2.62; p = 0.69, I (2) = 19.1 %) or hip decompression with bony procedures (OR = 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.35, 2.79; p = 0.69, I (2) = 0 %).

Conclusions: The cumulative evidence at present does not indicate an association between hip decompression and a lower rate of osteonecrosis of unstable SCFE. However, hip decompression of unstable SCFE remains an option that can potentially decompress the intracapsular hip pressure and optimize the blood flow to the femoral head. Thus, multicenter prospective cohort studies are required and will be able to answer this question with more certainty and a higher level of evidence.

Level of evidence: Level III/IV.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Forest plot: pooled odds ratio (OR) for osteonecrosis in the hip decompression versus no hip decompression groups with no bony procedures
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4417737&req=5

Fig3: Forest plot: pooled odds ratio (OR) for osteonecrosis in the hip decompression versus no hip decompression groups with no bony procedures

Mentions: Sensitivity analyses revealed a pooled OR for osteonecrosis of 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.36, 2.62; I2 = 19.1 %; p = 0.28) (Fig. 3) for unstable SCFE that underwent hip decompression with no bony procedures and a pooled OR of 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.35, 2.79; I2 = 0 %; p = 0.69) (Fig. 4) for unstable SCFE that underwent hip decompression and bony procedures, such as open epiphysiodesis and osteotomies. However, the differences were not significant.Fig. 3


Hip decompression of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ibrahim T, Mahmoud S, Riaz M, Hegazy A, Little DG - J Child Orthop (2015)

Forest plot: pooled odds ratio (OR) for osteonecrosis in the hip decompression versus no hip decompression groups with no bony procedures
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4417737&req=5

Fig3: Forest plot: pooled odds ratio (OR) for osteonecrosis in the hip decompression versus no hip decompression groups with no bony procedures
Mentions: Sensitivity analyses revealed a pooled OR for osteonecrosis of 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.36, 2.62; I2 = 19.1 %; p = 0.28) (Fig. 3) for unstable SCFE that underwent hip decompression with no bony procedures and a pooled OR of 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.35, 2.79; I2 = 0 %; p = 0.69) (Fig. 4) for unstable SCFE that underwent hip decompression and bony procedures, such as open epiphysiodesis and osteotomies. However, the differences were not significant.Fig. 3

Bottom Line: Unstable SCFE is characterized by sudden and severe hip pain with the inability to weight bear, even with crutches.Thus, multicenter prospective cohort studies are required and will be able to answer this question with more certainty and a higher level of evidence.Level III/IV.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar, tibrahim.ortho@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common adolescent hip conditions. Unstable SCFE is characterized by sudden and severe hip pain with the inability to weight bear, even with crutches. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is increased in patients with unstable SCFE. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature that compares hip decompression to no hip decompression of unstable SCFE.

Methods: We searched several databases from 1946 to 2014 for any observational or experimental studies that evaluated hip decompression and osteonecrosis of unstable SCFE. We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model to pool odds ratios (ORs) for the comparison of osteonecrosis between patients undergoing hip decompression and no hip decompression. We also investigated the type of hip decompression performed. Descriptive, quantitative, and qualitative data were extracted.

Results: Of the 17 articles identified, nine studies (eight case series and one retrospective cohort study) were eligible for the meta-analysis, with a total of 302 unstable SCFE. The pooled OR = 0.91 of osteonecrosis between hip decompression and no hip decompression was in favor of hip decompression, but was not statistically significant [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.47, 1.75; p = 0.54, I (2) = 0 %]. No significant differences in the rates of osteonecrosis were detected in unstable SCFE with open and percutaneous hip decompression alone (OR = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.36, 2.62; p = 0.69, I (2) = 19.1 %) or hip decompression with bony procedures (OR = 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.35, 2.79; p = 0.69, I (2) = 0 %).

Conclusions: The cumulative evidence at present does not indicate an association between hip decompression and a lower rate of osteonecrosis of unstable SCFE. However, hip decompression of unstable SCFE remains an option that can potentially decompress the intracapsular hip pressure and optimize the blood flow to the femoral head. Thus, multicenter prospective cohort studies are required and will be able to answer this question with more certainty and a higher level of evidence.

Level of evidence: Level III/IV.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus