Limits...
Correction.

- BMJ Open (2012)

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED EXCERPT
Please rate it.

Figure 2 reports the DiPCare-Q index combining weights regression function associating subjective social status to the DiPCare-Q sub-indexes from the derivation set... The entered numbers in the table do not fit to the function... numbers written in the table itself are issued from a first version that had not transformed sub-indexes before computing the final index... They are therefore erroneous... Please refer to the corrected figure below.

No MeSH data available.


© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4400676&req=5

Mentions: Vaucher P, Bischoff T, Diserens EA, et al. Detecting and measuringdeprivation in primary care: development, reliability and validity of a self-reportedquestionnaire: the DiPCare-Q. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000692. Figure 2 reports the DiPCare-Q index combining weightsfrom each of the three sub-indexes. The function below the figure corresponds to theregression function associating subjective social status to the DiPCare-Q sub-indexes fromthe derivation set. The entered numbers in the table do not fit to the function. Thenumbers written in the table itself are issued from a first version that had nottransformed sub-indexes before computing the final index. They are therefore erroneous.Please refer to the corrected figure below.


Correction.

- BMJ Open (2012)

© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4400676&req=5

Mentions: Vaucher P, Bischoff T, Diserens EA, et al. Detecting and measuringdeprivation in primary care: development, reliability and validity of a self-reportedquestionnaire: the DiPCare-Q. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000692. Figure 2 reports the DiPCare-Q index combining weightsfrom each of the three sub-indexes. The function below the figure corresponds to theregression function associating subjective social status to the DiPCare-Q sub-indexes fromthe derivation set. The entered numbers in the table do not fit to the function. Thenumbers written in the table itself are issued from a first version that had nottransformed sub-indexes before computing the final index. They are therefore erroneous.Please refer to the corrected figure below.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED EXCERPT
Please rate it.

Figure 2 reports the DiPCare-Q index combining weights regression function associating subjective social status to the DiPCare-Q sub-indexes from the derivation set... The entered numbers in the table do not fit to the function... numbers written in the table itself are issued from a first version that had not transformed sub-indexes before computing the final index... They are therefore erroneous... Please refer to the corrected figure below.

No MeSH data available.