Limits...
Correction.

- BMJ Open (2012)

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED EXCERPT
Please rate it.

process." Figure 3 should have been: " Forest plot of pooled ORs: In addition, the second sentence of the first full paragraph of page 5 contains an error... It is stated "Pooled OR of survival to hospital discharge for this subgroup was The correct version of figure 4 is below... The correct label should be " Forest plot of ORs for witnessed ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia survival: cardiocerebral column, should then read: "Eight of the nine studies using AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines demonstrated improved survival to hospital discharge for use of AHA/ERC 2005 compared to AHA/ERC 2000 Guidelines, a result that was statistically significant in five out of nine studies (figure 5)." We apologise for these errors.

No MeSH data available.


© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4400577&req=5

Mentions: In addition, the second sentence of the first full paragraph of page 5 contains anerror. It is stated "Pooled OR of survival to hospital discharge for this subgroup was2.98 (5% CI 1.92 to 4.62) (figure 3))". In fact, this needs to be “(figure 4)”, and not the figure4 that is currently included in the manuscript. The correct version of figure 4 isbelow. The correct label should be "Figure 4 Forest plot of ORs forwitnessed ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia survival: cardiocerebralresuscitation versus AHA/ERC 2000 studies." The second paragraph on the fifth page, leftcolumn, should then read: "Eight of the nine studies using AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelinesdemonstrated improved survival to hospital discharge for use of AHA/ERC 2005 compared toAHA/ERC 2000 Guidelines, a result that was statistically significant in five out of ninestudies (figure 5)."


Correction.

- BMJ Open (2012)

© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4400577&req=5

Mentions: In addition, the second sentence of the first full paragraph of page 5 contains anerror. It is stated "Pooled OR of survival to hospital discharge for this subgroup was2.98 (5% CI 1.92 to 4.62) (figure 3))". In fact, this needs to be “(figure 4)”, and not the figure4 that is currently included in the manuscript. The correct version of figure 4 isbelow. The correct label should be "Figure 4 Forest plot of ORs forwitnessed ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia survival: cardiocerebralresuscitation versus AHA/ERC 2000 studies." The second paragraph on the fifth page, leftcolumn, should then read: "Eight of the nine studies using AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelinesdemonstrated improved survival to hospital discharge for use of AHA/ERC 2005 compared toAHA/ERC 2000 Guidelines, a result that was statistically significant in five out of ninestudies (figure 5)."

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED EXCERPT
Please rate it.

process." Figure 3 should have been: " Forest plot of pooled ORs: In addition, the second sentence of the first full paragraph of page 5 contains an error... It is stated "Pooled OR of survival to hospital discharge for this subgroup was The correct version of figure 4 is below... The correct label should be " Forest plot of ORs for witnessed ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia survival: cardiocerebral column, should then read: "Eight of the nine studies using AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines demonstrated improved survival to hospital discharge for use of AHA/ERC 2005 compared to AHA/ERC 2000 Guidelines, a result that was statistically significant in five out of nine studies (figure 5)." We apologise for these errors.

No MeSH data available.