Limits...
Place field repetition and purely local remapping in a multicompartment environment.

Spiers HJ, Hayman RM, Jovalekic A, Marozzi E, Jeffery KJ - Cereb. Cortex (2013)

Bottom Line: Some studies report that place cells can disambiguate different compartments, while others report that they do not.Second, this repetition does not diminish with extended experience.Third, remapping was found to be purely local for both geometric change and contextual change.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, University College London, UK.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Within-compartment spatial bin-by-bin correlations between the first and last baseline conditions, or between each baseline and the environment-change trials. (A) Context-change manipulation. (B) Wall-removal manipulation. The compartments of interest are labeled with black bars. In the context-change trials, this is compartment 3, which was changed from white to black: correlations with this compartment dropped markedly in the context-change manipulation. In the wall-removal trials, this was compartment 4, which was the only compartment not to be changed, and likewise the only compartment in which correlations did not drop significantly. **P < 0.001.
© Copyright Policy - creative-commons
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4400414&req=5

BHT198F8: Within-compartment spatial bin-by-bin correlations between the first and last baseline conditions, or between each baseline and the environment-change trials. (A) Context-change manipulation. (B) Wall-removal manipulation. The compartments of interest are labeled with black bars. In the context-change trials, this is compartment 3, which was changed from white to black: correlations with this compartment dropped markedly in the context-change manipulation. In the wall-removal trials, this was compartment 4, which was the only compartment not to be changed, and likewise the only compartment in which correlations did not drop significantly. **P < 0.001.

Mentions: The results of the bin-by-bin spatial correlations, in which firing in each compartment in each condition was compared with firing in the same compartment in the other conditions, are shown graphically in Figure 8A and numerically in Table 3. The correlations in the changed compartment showed a large decrease, as expected, reflecting the reorganization of firing that took place in these compartments. Notably, however, the correlations in the other compartments did not change. This was quantified with a 2-way ANOVA comparing compartment against trial type, which showed no effect of trial type [F2,6 = 2.4, NS] but a significant effect of compartment [F3,6 = 8.7, P < 0.001] and a significant interaction [F6,312 = 2.9, P < 0.01]. Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that all correlations involving the context-change compartment on the context-change trial were significantly different (all t-values >2.29, P-values <0.05) except for the 2 correlations between the 2 baseline trials and the remapping trial, which were (as expected) both low and did not differ. By contrast, all other correlations were not significant. Therefore, changing the sensory qualities of a compartment significantly altered firing in that compartment, but only on that trial and only in that compartment. There was thus no nonlocal effect of the context change.Table 3


Place field repetition and purely local remapping in a multicompartment environment.

Spiers HJ, Hayman RM, Jovalekic A, Marozzi E, Jeffery KJ - Cereb. Cortex (2013)

Within-compartment spatial bin-by-bin correlations between the first and last baseline conditions, or between each baseline and the environment-change trials. (A) Context-change manipulation. (B) Wall-removal manipulation. The compartments of interest are labeled with black bars. In the context-change trials, this is compartment 3, which was changed from white to black: correlations with this compartment dropped markedly in the context-change manipulation. In the wall-removal trials, this was compartment 4, which was the only compartment not to be changed, and likewise the only compartment in which correlations did not drop significantly. **P < 0.001.
© Copyright Policy - creative-commons
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4400414&req=5

BHT198F8: Within-compartment spatial bin-by-bin correlations between the first and last baseline conditions, or between each baseline and the environment-change trials. (A) Context-change manipulation. (B) Wall-removal manipulation. The compartments of interest are labeled with black bars. In the context-change trials, this is compartment 3, which was changed from white to black: correlations with this compartment dropped markedly in the context-change manipulation. In the wall-removal trials, this was compartment 4, which was the only compartment not to be changed, and likewise the only compartment in which correlations did not drop significantly. **P < 0.001.
Mentions: The results of the bin-by-bin spatial correlations, in which firing in each compartment in each condition was compared with firing in the same compartment in the other conditions, are shown graphically in Figure 8A and numerically in Table 3. The correlations in the changed compartment showed a large decrease, as expected, reflecting the reorganization of firing that took place in these compartments. Notably, however, the correlations in the other compartments did not change. This was quantified with a 2-way ANOVA comparing compartment against trial type, which showed no effect of trial type [F2,6 = 2.4, NS] but a significant effect of compartment [F3,6 = 8.7, P < 0.001] and a significant interaction [F6,312 = 2.9, P < 0.01]. Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that all correlations involving the context-change compartment on the context-change trial were significantly different (all t-values >2.29, P-values <0.05) except for the 2 correlations between the 2 baseline trials and the remapping trial, which were (as expected) both low and did not differ. By contrast, all other correlations were not significant. Therefore, changing the sensory qualities of a compartment significantly altered firing in that compartment, but only on that trial and only in that compartment. There was thus no nonlocal effect of the context change.Table 3

Bottom Line: Some studies report that place cells can disambiguate different compartments, while others report that they do not.Second, this repetition does not diminish with extended experience.Third, remapping was found to be purely local for both geometric change and contextual change.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, University College London, UK.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus