Limits...
Correction: Network meta-analysis using R: a review of currently available automated packages.

- PLoS ONE (2015)

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

A sample of the detailed comparison-wise forest plots available from the gemtc R package outlining odds ratio estimates from contributing studies, direct evidence and indirect evidence using two of the pairwise comparisons from the diabetes data.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4383511&req=5

pone.0123364.g002: A sample of the detailed comparison-wise forest plots available from the gemtc R package outlining odds ratio estimates from contributing studies, direct evidence and indirect evidence using two of the pairwise comparisons from the diabetes data.

Mentions: The order of Figs. 3, 4, and 5 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig. 3 should be Fig. 5, the image that appears as Fig. 4 should be Fig. 3, and the image that appears as Fig. 5 should be Fig. 4. The Figure legends appear in the correct order. Additionally, the caption for Fig. 4 is incorrect, and the description of Fig. 4 in the second sentence of the sixth paragraph under the subheading Application using Diabetes Data in the Results section is incorrect. The correct sentence is “A forest plot available from the gemtc package provides the pairwise estimates of odds ratios, shown in Fig. 3, and also includes a visual breakdown of each pairwise comparison where two of the pairwise comparisons are illustrated in Fig. 4.” Please view Figs 3, 4, and 5, along with their correct legends here.


Correction: Network meta-analysis using R: a review of currently available automated packages.

- PLoS ONE (2015)

A sample of the detailed comparison-wise forest plots available from the gemtc R package outlining odds ratio estimates from contributing studies, direct evidence and indirect evidence using two of the pairwise comparisons from the diabetes data.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4383511&req=5

pone.0123364.g002: A sample of the detailed comparison-wise forest plots available from the gemtc R package outlining odds ratio estimates from contributing studies, direct evidence and indirect evidence using two of the pairwise comparisons from the diabetes data.
Mentions: The order of Figs. 3, 4, and 5 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig. 3 should be Fig. 5, the image that appears as Fig. 4 should be Fig. 3, and the image that appears as Fig. 5 should be Fig. 4. The Figure legends appear in the correct order. Additionally, the caption for Fig. 4 is incorrect, and the description of Fig. 4 in the second sentence of the sixth paragraph under the subheading Application using Diabetes Data in the Results section is incorrect. The correct sentence is “A forest plot available from the gemtc package provides the pairwise estimates of odds ratios, shown in Fig. 3, and also includes a visual breakdown of each pairwise comparison where two of the pairwise comparisons are illustrated in Fig. 4.” Please view Figs 3, 4, and 5, along with their correct legends here.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus