Limits...
Spatio-temporal analysis of the accuracy of tropical multisatellite precipitation analysis 3B42 precipitation data in mid-high latitudes of China.

Cai Y, Jin C, Wang A, Guan D, Wu J, Yuan F, Xu L - PLoS ONE (2015)

Bottom Line: Generally, TMPA data performs best in summer, but worst in winter, which is likely to be associated with the effects of snow/ice-covered surfaces and shortcomings of precipitation retrieval algorithms.Temporal and spatial analysis of accuracy indices suggest that the performance of TMPA data has gradually improved and has benefited from upgrades; the data are more reliable in humid areas than in arid regions.Also, it is clear that the calibration can significantly improve precipitation estimates, the overestimation by TMPA in TRMM-covered area is about a third as much as that in no-TRMM area for monthly and annual precipitation.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China; Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

ABSTRACT
Satellite-based precipitation data have contributed greatly to quantitatively forecasting precipitation, and provides a potential alternative source for precipitation data allowing researchers to better understand patterns of precipitation over ungauged basins. However, the absence of calibration satellite data creates considerable uncertainties for The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) 3B42 product over high latitude areas beyond the TRMM satellites latitude band (38°NS). This study attempts to statistically assess TMPA V7 data over the region beyond 40°NS using data obtained from numerous weather stations in 1998-2012. Comparative analysis at three timescales (daily, monthly and annual scale) indicates that adoption of a monthly adjustment significantly improved correlation at a larger timescale increasing from 0.63 to 0.95; TMPA data always exhibits a slight overestimation that is most serious at a daily scale (the absolute bias is 103.54%). Moreover, the performance of TMPA data varies across all seasons. Generally, TMPA data performs best in summer, but worst in winter, which is likely to be associated with the effects of snow/ice-covered surfaces and shortcomings of precipitation retrieval algorithms. Temporal and spatial analysis of accuracy indices suggest that the performance of TMPA data has gradually improved and has benefited from upgrades; the data are more reliable in humid areas than in arid regions. Special attention should be paid to its application in arid areas and in winter with poor scores of accuracy indices. Also, it is clear that the calibration can significantly improve precipitation estimates, the overestimation by TMPA in TRMM-covered area is about a third as much as that in no-TRMM area for monthly and annual precipitation. The systematic evaluation of TMPA over mid-high latitudes provides a broader understanding of satellite-based precipitation estimates, and these data are important for the rational application of TMPA methods in climatic and hydrological research.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Density scatter plots of TMPA versus rain gauge at daily scale for four seasons: (a) Spring, (b) Summer, (c) Autumn, (d) Winter.The definitions and acronyms presented in each plot are the same as those used in Fig. 4.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4382316&req=5

pone.0120026.g006: Density scatter plots of TMPA versus rain gauge at daily scale for four seasons: (a) Spring, (b) Summer, (c) Autumn, (d) Winter.The definitions and acronyms presented in each plot are the same as those used in Fig. 4.

Mentions: The seasonal characteristics of error were investigated across this region (Fig. 6). Four seasons were defined as followings: spring, March through May; summer, June through August; autumn, September through November; and winter, December through February. Statistical indices did not have similar scores for all four seasons (Fig. 6). The best CC score appeared in summer (about 0.63), but in winter it had the lowest score (about 0.35). Except for spring, a moderate but good linear relationship was observed between TMPA V7 and rain gauge for each season over the mid-high latitudes regions with CC greater than 0.55.


Spatio-temporal analysis of the accuracy of tropical multisatellite precipitation analysis 3B42 precipitation data in mid-high latitudes of China.

Cai Y, Jin C, Wang A, Guan D, Wu J, Yuan F, Xu L - PLoS ONE (2015)

Density scatter plots of TMPA versus rain gauge at daily scale for four seasons: (a) Spring, (b) Summer, (c) Autumn, (d) Winter.The definitions and acronyms presented in each plot are the same as those used in Fig. 4.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4382316&req=5

pone.0120026.g006: Density scatter plots of TMPA versus rain gauge at daily scale for four seasons: (a) Spring, (b) Summer, (c) Autumn, (d) Winter.The definitions and acronyms presented in each plot are the same as those used in Fig. 4.
Mentions: The seasonal characteristics of error were investigated across this region (Fig. 6). Four seasons were defined as followings: spring, March through May; summer, June through August; autumn, September through November; and winter, December through February. Statistical indices did not have similar scores for all four seasons (Fig. 6). The best CC score appeared in summer (about 0.63), but in winter it had the lowest score (about 0.35). Except for spring, a moderate but good linear relationship was observed between TMPA V7 and rain gauge for each season over the mid-high latitudes regions with CC greater than 0.55.

Bottom Line: Generally, TMPA data performs best in summer, but worst in winter, which is likely to be associated with the effects of snow/ice-covered surfaces and shortcomings of precipitation retrieval algorithms.Temporal and spatial analysis of accuracy indices suggest that the performance of TMPA data has gradually improved and has benefited from upgrades; the data are more reliable in humid areas than in arid regions.Also, it is clear that the calibration can significantly improve precipitation estimates, the overestimation by TMPA in TRMM-covered area is about a third as much as that in no-TRMM area for monthly and annual precipitation.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China; Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

ABSTRACT
Satellite-based precipitation data have contributed greatly to quantitatively forecasting precipitation, and provides a potential alternative source for precipitation data allowing researchers to better understand patterns of precipitation over ungauged basins. However, the absence of calibration satellite data creates considerable uncertainties for The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) 3B42 product over high latitude areas beyond the TRMM satellites latitude band (38°NS). This study attempts to statistically assess TMPA V7 data over the region beyond 40°NS using data obtained from numerous weather stations in 1998-2012. Comparative analysis at three timescales (daily, monthly and annual scale) indicates that adoption of a monthly adjustment significantly improved correlation at a larger timescale increasing from 0.63 to 0.95; TMPA data always exhibits a slight overestimation that is most serious at a daily scale (the absolute bias is 103.54%). Moreover, the performance of TMPA data varies across all seasons. Generally, TMPA data performs best in summer, but worst in winter, which is likely to be associated with the effects of snow/ice-covered surfaces and shortcomings of precipitation retrieval algorithms. Temporal and spatial analysis of accuracy indices suggest that the performance of TMPA data has gradually improved and has benefited from upgrades; the data are more reliable in humid areas than in arid regions. Special attention should be paid to its application in arid areas and in winter with poor scores of accuracy indices. Also, it is clear that the calibration can significantly improve precipitation estimates, the overestimation by TMPA in TRMM-covered area is about a third as much as that in no-TRMM area for monthly and annual precipitation. The systematic evaluation of TMPA over mid-high latitudes provides a broader understanding of satellite-based precipitation estimates, and these data are important for the rational application of TMPA methods in climatic and hydrological research.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus