Limits...
Why women engage in anal intercourse: results from a qualitative study.

Reynolds GL, Fisher DG, Rogala B - Arch Sex Behav (2014)

Bottom Line: Among the negative physical experiences of AI were pain and disliking the sensation, and uncomfortable side effects, such as bleeding of the rectum.Pain during AI was mitigated by the use of lubricants or illicit drugs.Even those women who found pleasure in AI expressed a preference for vaginal intercourse.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Center for Behavioral Research and Services, California State University, 1090 Atlantic Ave., Long Beach, CA, 90813, USA, Grace.Reynolds@csulb.edu.

ABSTRACT
This study used qualitative methods to assess why women engage in heterosexual anal (receptive) intercourse (AI) with a male partner. Four focus groups which comprised women from diverse ethnicities were conducted. All groups were digitally recorded for transcription; transcripts were analyzed using the methods of grounded theory to determine themes. Women's reasons for engaging in anal intercourse with a male partner can be described in broad categories including that the women wanted to have anal intercourse, either because of their own desire, to please a male partner, or they were responding to a quid pro quo situation. The riskiness of AI was assessed within relationship contexts. Past experience with AI including emotional and physical reactions was identified. Among the negative physical experiences of AI were pain and disliking the sensation, and uncomfortable side effects, such as bleeding of the rectum. Negative emotional experiences of AI included feelings of shame, disgust, and being offended by something her male partner did, such as spitting on his penis for lubrication. Positive physical experiences included liking the sensation. Many of the women also endorsed positive emotional experiences of AI, including that it was more intimate than vaginal sex, and that it was something they reserved only for special partners. The majority of AI episodes were unplanned and not discussed prior to initiation. Pain during AI was mitigated by the use of lubricants or illicit drugs. Even those women who found pleasure in AI expressed a preference for vaginal intercourse.

Show MeSH
Women’s Positive physical and emotional experiences of anal intercourse (N = 32)
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4379393&req=5

Fig3: Women’s Positive physical and emotional experiences of anal intercourse (N = 32)

Mentions: The current study also sought to understand women’s physical and emotional experiences during and immediately after anal intercourse. Analysis of women’s descriptions uncovered a variety of contexts that were related to women’s enjoyment or discomfort when engaging in anal intercourse (see Fig. 3). Ten of the women (10/32; 31 % of participants) described anal intercourse as enjoyable.


Why women engage in anal intercourse: results from a qualitative study.

Reynolds GL, Fisher DG, Rogala B - Arch Sex Behav (2014)

Women’s Positive physical and emotional experiences of anal intercourse (N = 32)
© Copyright Policy - OpenAccess
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4379393&req=5

Fig3: Women’s Positive physical and emotional experiences of anal intercourse (N = 32)
Mentions: The current study also sought to understand women’s physical and emotional experiences during and immediately after anal intercourse. Analysis of women’s descriptions uncovered a variety of contexts that were related to women’s enjoyment or discomfort when engaging in anal intercourse (see Fig. 3). Ten of the women (10/32; 31 % of participants) described anal intercourse as enjoyable.

Bottom Line: Among the negative physical experiences of AI were pain and disliking the sensation, and uncomfortable side effects, such as bleeding of the rectum.Pain during AI was mitigated by the use of lubricants or illicit drugs.Even those women who found pleasure in AI expressed a preference for vaginal intercourse.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Center for Behavioral Research and Services, California State University, 1090 Atlantic Ave., Long Beach, CA, 90813, USA, Grace.Reynolds@csulb.edu.

ABSTRACT
This study used qualitative methods to assess why women engage in heterosexual anal (receptive) intercourse (AI) with a male partner. Four focus groups which comprised women from diverse ethnicities were conducted. All groups were digitally recorded for transcription; transcripts were analyzed using the methods of grounded theory to determine themes. Women's reasons for engaging in anal intercourse with a male partner can be described in broad categories including that the women wanted to have anal intercourse, either because of their own desire, to please a male partner, or they were responding to a quid pro quo situation. The riskiness of AI was assessed within relationship contexts. Past experience with AI including emotional and physical reactions was identified. Among the negative physical experiences of AI were pain and disliking the sensation, and uncomfortable side effects, such as bleeding of the rectum. Negative emotional experiences of AI included feelings of shame, disgust, and being offended by something her male partner did, such as spitting on his penis for lubrication. Positive physical experiences included liking the sensation. Many of the women also endorsed positive emotional experiences of AI, including that it was more intimate than vaginal sex, and that it was something they reserved only for special partners. The majority of AI episodes were unplanned and not discussed prior to initiation. Pain during AI was mitigated by the use of lubricants or illicit drugs. Even those women who found pleasure in AI expressed a preference for vaginal intercourse.

Show MeSH