Limits...
The carbonyl scavenger carnosine ameliorates dyslipidaemia and renal function in Zucker obese rats.

Aldini G, Orioli M, Rossoni G, Savi F, Braidotti P, Vistoli G, Yeum KJ, Negrisoli G, Carini M - J. Cell. Mol. Med. (2010)

Bottom Line: Several indices of oxidative/carbonyl stress were also measured in plasma, urine and renal tissue.We found that both L- and D-CAR greatly reduced obese-related diseases in obese Zucker rat, by significantly restraining the development of dyslipidaemia, hypertension and renal injury, as demonstrated by both urinary parameters and electron microscopy examinations of renal tissue.Because the protective effect elicited by L- and D-CAR was almost superimposable, we conclude that the pharmacological action of L-CAR is not due to a pro-histaminic effect (D-CAR is not a precursor of histidine, since it is stable to peptidic hydrolysis), and prompted us to propose that some of the biological effects can be mediated by a direct carbonyl quenching mechanism.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pietro Pratesi, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. giancarlo.aldini@unimi.it

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Renal functions and histological alterations in LN, ZK and Zucker treated animals (ZK + L; ZK + D). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. relative to six animals/group. All ZK values statistically different from LN (P < 0.001). All ZK + L and ZK + D values not statistically different. *P < 0.05 versus ZK, **P < 0.01 versus ZK, ***P < 0.001 versus ZK.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection


getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4373334&req=5

fig06: Renal functions and histological alterations in LN, ZK and Zucker treated animals (ZK + L; ZK + D). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. relative to six animals/group. All ZK values statistically different from LN (P < 0.001). All ZK + L and ZK + D values not statistically different. *P < 0.05 versus ZK, **P < 0.01 versus ZK, ***P < 0.001 versus ZK.

Mentions: A 2.4-fold increase in plasma creatinine concentration was observed in ZK compared to LN rats (P < 0.001), an effect that was significantly restrained by both L-CAR (–31.7%versus ZK; P < 0.001) and D-CAR (–36%versus ZK; P < 0.001) (data not shown). A similar protective trend was also observed by considering the urinary albumin, creatinine and protein excretions, which were increased 14-fold (P < 0.001), 2.5-fold (P < 0.001) and 6.8-fold (P < 0.001), respectively, in ZK rats compared to the LN animals. Both L-CAR and D-CAR provided a significant protection against the development of proteinuria/albuminuria/creatininuria, which was restrained by approximately 50% (data not shown). The overall renoprotective effect of both the compounds is well described by the parameters reported in Figure 6. Creatinine clearance (expressed as GFR), was reduced by 45.8% in ZK compared to LN rats, and was significantly improved by both L-CAR (+28.3%versus ZK) and D-CAR (+25.1%versus ZK) (Fig. 6A). A more pronounced protective effect was induced by both the compounds on the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, which is the early, easily measurable and reliable biomarker of nephropathy [51] (Fig. 6C). The 35-fold increase observed in ZK compared to LN animals was, in fact, restrained by 65–70% in both L- and D-CAR treated animals.


The carbonyl scavenger carnosine ameliorates dyslipidaemia and renal function in Zucker obese rats.

Aldini G, Orioli M, Rossoni G, Savi F, Braidotti P, Vistoli G, Yeum KJ, Negrisoli G, Carini M - J. Cell. Mol. Med. (2010)

Renal functions and histological alterations in LN, ZK and Zucker treated animals (ZK + L; ZK + D). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. relative to six animals/group. All ZK values statistically different from LN (P < 0.001). All ZK + L and ZK + D values not statistically different. *P < 0.05 versus ZK, **P < 0.01 versus ZK, ***P < 0.001 versus ZK.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4373334&req=5

fig06: Renal functions and histological alterations in LN, ZK and Zucker treated animals (ZK + L; ZK + D). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. relative to six animals/group. All ZK values statistically different from LN (P < 0.001). All ZK + L and ZK + D values not statistically different. *P < 0.05 versus ZK, **P < 0.01 versus ZK, ***P < 0.001 versus ZK.
Mentions: A 2.4-fold increase in plasma creatinine concentration was observed in ZK compared to LN rats (P < 0.001), an effect that was significantly restrained by both L-CAR (–31.7%versus ZK; P < 0.001) and D-CAR (–36%versus ZK; P < 0.001) (data not shown). A similar protective trend was also observed by considering the urinary albumin, creatinine and protein excretions, which were increased 14-fold (P < 0.001), 2.5-fold (P < 0.001) and 6.8-fold (P < 0.001), respectively, in ZK rats compared to the LN animals. Both L-CAR and D-CAR provided a significant protection against the development of proteinuria/albuminuria/creatininuria, which was restrained by approximately 50% (data not shown). The overall renoprotective effect of both the compounds is well described by the parameters reported in Figure 6. Creatinine clearance (expressed as GFR), was reduced by 45.8% in ZK compared to LN rats, and was significantly improved by both L-CAR (+28.3%versus ZK) and D-CAR (+25.1%versus ZK) (Fig. 6A). A more pronounced protective effect was induced by both the compounds on the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, which is the early, easily measurable and reliable biomarker of nephropathy [51] (Fig. 6C). The 35-fold increase observed in ZK compared to LN animals was, in fact, restrained by 65–70% in both L- and D-CAR treated animals.

Bottom Line: Several indices of oxidative/carbonyl stress were also measured in plasma, urine and renal tissue.We found that both L- and D-CAR greatly reduced obese-related diseases in obese Zucker rat, by significantly restraining the development of dyslipidaemia, hypertension and renal injury, as demonstrated by both urinary parameters and electron microscopy examinations of renal tissue.Because the protective effect elicited by L- and D-CAR was almost superimposable, we conclude that the pharmacological action of L-CAR is not due to a pro-histaminic effect (D-CAR is not a precursor of histidine, since it is stable to peptidic hydrolysis), and prompted us to propose that some of the biological effects can be mediated by a direct carbonyl quenching mechanism.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pietro Pratesi, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. giancarlo.aldini@unimi.it

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus