Limits...
What is orthopaedic triage? A systematic review.

Morris JH, James RE, Davey R, Waddington G - J Eval Clin Pract (2014)

Bottom Line: Studies were critically appraised using the McMaster quality appraisal tool and ranked using the National Health and Medical Research Council hierarchy of evidence.The hierarchy of evidence ranged from I to IV; however, the majority were at low levels of evidence and scored poorly on the critical appraisal tool.However, there were significant inconsistencies across these themes.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Health professions undertaking triage.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4359679&req=5

fig03: Health professions undertaking triage.

Mentions: Where the ways in which triage were delivered was reported, there was considerable variability in context, staffing and methods of triage. Triage was reported in the context of team-based triage and single discipline (most commonly reported as physiotherapists when single discipline was reported). The referral data in Table 4 has been further extrapolated and presented in Fig 3, which details the different health professions undertaking triage.


What is orthopaedic triage? A systematic review.

Morris JH, James RE, Davey R, Waddington G - J Eval Clin Pract (2014)

Health professions undertaking triage.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4359679&req=5

fig03: Health professions undertaking triage.
Mentions: Where the ways in which triage were delivered was reported, there was considerable variability in context, staffing and methods of triage. Triage was reported in the context of team-based triage and single discipline (most commonly reported as physiotherapists when single discipline was reported). The referral data in Table 4 has been further extrapolated and presented in Fig 3, which details the different health professions undertaking triage.

Bottom Line: Studies were critically appraised using the McMaster quality appraisal tool and ranked using the National Health and Medical Research Council hierarchy of evidence.The hierarchy of evidence ranged from I to IV; however, the majority were at low levels of evidence and scored poorly on the critical appraisal tool.However, there were significant inconsistencies across these themes.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus