Limits...
Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study.

Iwasaki Y, Shimada J, Kato D, Nishimura M, Ito K, Terauchi K, Shimomura M, Tsunezuka H - J Cardiothorac Surg (2015)

Bottom Line: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an initiative to standardize surgical tasks for efficient and safe performance.Operation times and blood loss were compared before and after standardization.A post-standardization survey showed improved morale among the meeting participants.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nantan General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. Y-Iwasaki@sings.jp.

ABSTRACT

Background: Treatment protocols (including those for thoracic surgery) tend to be customized for individual hospitals. Procedural standardization is required to improve surgical tasks and patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an initiative to standardize surgical tasks for efficient and safe performance.

Methods: Hospitals associated with the Division of Chest Surgery of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine held joint meetings involving their thoracic surgeons and operating room nurses between February 2011 and November 2012 to standardize surgical tasks. Operation times and blood loss were compared before and after standardization.

Results: The implementation rate of standardized surgical tasks was 97%. The pre-operative (from entry to the operating room until commencement of surgery) and post-operative (from conclusion of surgery until departure from the operating room) times were significantly decreased after the standardization. When compared according to operative group (all thoracic surgery, lung lobectomy, and partial lung resection), operation times were shorter for all three groups; in addition, the amount of blood loss was lower in all three groups after standardization. A post-standardization survey showed improved morale among the meeting participants.

Conclusions: Interdisciplinary standardization of surgical tasks across institutions improved thoracic surgery tasks and surgical outcomes.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

A post-standardization survey about the change of attitude toward the ideas for improvement of surgical tasks and thoracic surgery for participants of the joint meetings.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4356109&req=5

Fig2: A post-standardization survey about the change of attitude toward the ideas for improvement of surgical tasks and thoracic surgery for participants of the joint meetings.

Mentions: In the questionnaire, all members (n=18) referred to tips for improvement from other hospitals, and they attempted generate their own ideas. All members confirmed improved understanding of thoracic surgery and 83% of the participants confirmed increased interest in thoracic surgery (FigureĀ 2).Figure 2


Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study.

Iwasaki Y, Shimada J, Kato D, Nishimura M, Ito K, Terauchi K, Shimomura M, Tsunezuka H - J Cardiothorac Surg (2015)

A post-standardization survey about the change of attitude toward the ideas for improvement of surgical tasks and thoracic surgery for participants of the joint meetings.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License 1 - License 2
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4356109&req=5

Fig2: A post-standardization survey about the change of attitude toward the ideas for improvement of surgical tasks and thoracic surgery for participants of the joint meetings.
Mentions: In the questionnaire, all members (n=18) referred to tips for improvement from other hospitals, and they attempted generate their own ideas. All members confirmed improved understanding of thoracic surgery and 83% of the participants confirmed increased interest in thoracic surgery (FigureĀ 2).Figure 2

Bottom Line: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an initiative to standardize surgical tasks for efficient and safe performance.Operation times and blood loss were compared before and after standardization.A post-standardization survey showed improved morale among the meeting participants.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nantan General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. Y-Iwasaki@sings.jp.

ABSTRACT

Background: Treatment protocols (including those for thoracic surgery) tend to be customized for individual hospitals. Procedural standardization is required to improve surgical tasks and patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an initiative to standardize surgical tasks for efficient and safe performance.

Methods: Hospitals associated with the Division of Chest Surgery of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine held joint meetings involving their thoracic surgeons and operating room nurses between February 2011 and November 2012 to standardize surgical tasks. Operation times and blood loss were compared before and after standardization.

Results: The implementation rate of standardized surgical tasks was 97%. The pre-operative (from entry to the operating room until commencement of surgery) and post-operative (from conclusion of surgery until departure from the operating room) times were significantly decreased after the standardization. When compared according to operative group (all thoracic surgery, lung lobectomy, and partial lung resection), operation times were shorter for all three groups; in addition, the amount of blood loss was lower in all three groups after standardization. A post-standardization survey showed improved morale among the meeting participants.

Conclusions: Interdisciplinary standardization of surgical tasks across institutions improved thoracic surgery tasks and surgical outcomes.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus