Limits...
Estimation of MERS-Coronavirus Reproductive Number and Case Fatality Rate for the Spring 2014 Saudi Arabia Outbreak: Insights from Publicly Available Data.

Majumder MS, Rivers C, Lofgren E, Fisman D - PLoS Curr (2014)

Bottom Line: In spring 2014, large healthcare-associated outbreaks of MERS-CoV infection occurred in Jeddah and Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Notwithstanding imperfect data, inferences about MERS-CoV epidemiology important for public health preparedness are possible using publicly available data sources.These data suggest this disease should be regarded with equal or greater concern than the related SARS-CoV.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

ABSTRACT

Background: The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was initially recognized as a source of severe respiratory illness and renal failure in 2012. Prior to 2014, MERS-CoV was mostly associated with sporadic cases of human illness, of presumed zoonotic origin, though chains of person-to-person transmission in the healthcare setting were reported. In spring 2014, large healthcare-associated outbreaks of MERS-CoV infection occurred in Jeddah and Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. To date the epidemiological information published by public health investigators in affected jurisdictions has been relatively limited. However, it is important that the global public health community have access to information on the basic epidemiological features of the outbreak to date, including the basic reproduction number (R0) and best estimates of case-fatality rates (CFR). We sought to address these gaps using a publicly available line listing of MERS-CoV cases.

Methods: R0 was estimated using the incidence decay with exponential adjustment ("IDEA") method, while period-specific case fatality rates that incorporated non-attributed death data were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation.

Results: 707 cases were available for evaluation. 52% of cases were identified as primary, with the rest being secondary. IDEA model fits suggested a higher R0 in Jeddah (3.5-6.7) than in Riyadh (2.0-2.8); control parameters suggested more rapid reduction in transmission in the former city than the latter. The model accurately projected final size and end date of the Riyadh outbreak based on information available prior to the outbreak peak; for Jeddah, these projections were possible once the outbreak peaked. Overall case-fatality was 40%; depending on the timing of 171 deaths unlinked to case data, outbreak CFR could be higher, lower, or equivalent to pre-outbreak CFR.

Conclusions: Notwithstanding imperfect data, inferences about MERS-CoV epidemiology important for public health preparedness are possible using publicly available data sources. The R0 estimated in Riyadh appears similar to that seen for SARS-CoV, but CFR appears higher, and indirect evidence suggests control activities ended these outbreaks. These data suggest this disease should be regarded with equal or greater concern than the related SARS-CoV.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

As expected, R estimates increase with increasing serial interval for both cities, though the increase is more marked for Jeddah. Both R and d are higher for Jeddah, denoting a more explosive, but more aggressively controlled, outbreak.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4322060&req=5

d35e387: As expected, R estimates increase with increasing serial interval for both cities, though the increase is more marked for Jeddah. Both R and d are higher for Jeddah, denoting a more explosive, but more aggressively controlled, outbreak.


Estimation of MERS-Coronavirus Reproductive Number and Case Fatality Rate for the Spring 2014 Saudi Arabia Outbreak: Insights from Publicly Available Data.

Majumder MS, Rivers C, Lofgren E, Fisman D - PLoS Curr (2014)

As expected, R estimates increase with increasing serial interval for both cities, though the increase is more marked for Jeddah. Both R and d are higher for Jeddah, denoting a more explosive, but more aggressively controlled, outbreak.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4322060&req=5

d35e387: As expected, R estimates increase with increasing serial interval for both cities, though the increase is more marked for Jeddah. Both R and d are higher for Jeddah, denoting a more explosive, but more aggressively controlled, outbreak.
Bottom Line: In spring 2014, large healthcare-associated outbreaks of MERS-CoV infection occurred in Jeddah and Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Notwithstanding imperfect data, inferences about MERS-CoV epidemiology important for public health preparedness are possible using publicly available data sources.These data suggest this disease should be regarded with equal or greater concern than the related SARS-CoV.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

ABSTRACT

Background: The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was initially recognized as a source of severe respiratory illness and renal failure in 2012. Prior to 2014, MERS-CoV was mostly associated with sporadic cases of human illness, of presumed zoonotic origin, though chains of person-to-person transmission in the healthcare setting were reported. In spring 2014, large healthcare-associated outbreaks of MERS-CoV infection occurred in Jeddah and Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. To date the epidemiological information published by public health investigators in affected jurisdictions has been relatively limited. However, it is important that the global public health community have access to information on the basic epidemiological features of the outbreak to date, including the basic reproduction number (R0) and best estimates of case-fatality rates (CFR). We sought to address these gaps using a publicly available line listing of MERS-CoV cases.

Methods: R0 was estimated using the incidence decay with exponential adjustment ("IDEA") method, while period-specific case fatality rates that incorporated non-attributed death data were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation.

Results: 707 cases were available for evaluation. 52% of cases were identified as primary, with the rest being secondary. IDEA model fits suggested a higher R0 in Jeddah (3.5-6.7) than in Riyadh (2.0-2.8); control parameters suggested more rapid reduction in transmission in the former city than the latter. The model accurately projected final size and end date of the Riyadh outbreak based on information available prior to the outbreak peak; for Jeddah, these projections were possible once the outbreak peaked. Overall case-fatality was 40%; depending on the timing of 171 deaths unlinked to case data, outbreak CFR could be higher, lower, or equivalent to pre-outbreak CFR.

Conclusions: Notwithstanding imperfect data, inferences about MERS-CoV epidemiology important for public health preparedness are possible using publicly available data sources. The R0 estimated in Riyadh appears similar to that seen for SARS-CoV, but CFR appears higher, and indirect evidence suggests control activities ended these outbreaks. These data suggest this disease should be regarded with equal or greater concern than the related SARS-CoV.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus