Limits...
Sensorimotor control of gait: a novel approach for the study of the interplay of visual and proprioceptive feedback.

Frost R, Skidmore J, Santello M, Artemiadis P - Front Hum Neurosci (2015)

Bottom Line: In our study, we tested this theoretical framework by quantifying the functional role of expected vs. actual proprioceptive feedback for planning and regulation of gait in humans.However, when proprioceptive feedback is not available, the early responses in leg kinematics do not occur while the late responses are preserved although in a, slightly attenuated form.The methods proposed in this study and the preliminary results of the kinematic response of the contralateral leg open new directions for the investigation of the relative role of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive feedback on gait control, with potential implications for designing novel robot-assisted gait rehabilitation approaches.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Human-Oriented Robotics and Control Lab, School for Engineering of Matter Transport and Energy, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.

ABSTRACT
Sensorimotor control theories propose that the central nervous system exploits expected sensory consequences generated by motor commands for movement planning, as well as online sensory feedback for comparison with expected sensory feedback for monitoring and correcting, if needed, ongoing motor output. In our study, we tested this theoretical framework by quantifying the functional role of expected vs. actual proprioceptive feedback for planning and regulation of gait in humans. We addressed this question by using a novel methodological approach to deliver fast perturbations of the walking surface stiffness, in conjunction with a virtual reality system that provided visual feedback of upcoming changes of surface stiffness. In the "predictable" experimental condition, we asked subjects to learn associating visual feedback of changes in floor stiffness (sand patch) during locomotion to quantify kinematic and kinetic changes in gait prior to and during the gait cycle. In the "unpredictable" experimental condition, we perturbed floor stiffness at unpredictable instances during the gait to characterize the gait-phase dependent strategies in recovering the locomotor cycle. For the "unpredictable" conditions, visual feedback of changes in floor stiffness was absent or inconsistent with tactile and proprioceptive feedback. The investigation of these perturbation-induced effects on contralateral leg kinematics revealed that visual feedback of upcoming changes in floor stiffness allows for both early (preparatory) and late (post-perturbation) changes in leg kinematics. However, when proprioceptive feedback is not available, the early responses in leg kinematics do not occur while the late responses are preserved although in a, slightly attenuated form. The methods proposed in this study and the preliminary results of the kinematic response of the contralateral leg open new directions for the investigation of the relative role of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive feedback on gait control, with potential implications for designing novel robot-assisted gait rehabilitation approaches.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Phase space of unperturbed leg kinematics. Unperturbed (right) leg kinematics represented in phase space (i.e., angular position vs. angular velocity). Data are from a representative subject.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4321402&req=5

Figure 7: Phase space of unperturbed leg kinematics. Unperturbed (right) leg kinematics represented in phase space (i.e., angular position vs. angular velocity). Data are from a representative subject.

Mentions: The kinematics of the right leg were also represented in phase space (angular position vs. angular velocity). This space offers a better understanding of the behavior of a periodic system after a perturbation, and allows the analysis of the stability and robustness of the system in general. Angular velocities for all three joints investigated were computed by differentiating the angular position data, after low-pass filtering them (Butterworth filter, 2nd order, cut-off frequency of 4 Hz). The phase plots of each of the three joints of the right leg are shown in Figure 7. The TO and HS for each of the four conditions are shown. The data shown and the definition of the right cycle gait cycle is identical to the one used for Figure 6.


Sensorimotor control of gait: a novel approach for the study of the interplay of visual and proprioceptive feedback.

Frost R, Skidmore J, Santello M, Artemiadis P - Front Hum Neurosci (2015)

Phase space of unperturbed leg kinematics. Unperturbed (right) leg kinematics represented in phase space (i.e., angular position vs. angular velocity). Data are from a representative subject.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4321402&req=5

Figure 7: Phase space of unperturbed leg kinematics. Unperturbed (right) leg kinematics represented in phase space (i.e., angular position vs. angular velocity). Data are from a representative subject.
Mentions: The kinematics of the right leg were also represented in phase space (angular position vs. angular velocity). This space offers a better understanding of the behavior of a periodic system after a perturbation, and allows the analysis of the stability and robustness of the system in general. Angular velocities for all three joints investigated were computed by differentiating the angular position data, after low-pass filtering them (Butterworth filter, 2nd order, cut-off frequency of 4 Hz). The phase plots of each of the three joints of the right leg are shown in Figure 7. The TO and HS for each of the four conditions are shown. The data shown and the definition of the right cycle gait cycle is identical to the one used for Figure 6.

Bottom Line: In our study, we tested this theoretical framework by quantifying the functional role of expected vs. actual proprioceptive feedback for planning and regulation of gait in humans.However, when proprioceptive feedback is not available, the early responses in leg kinematics do not occur while the late responses are preserved although in a, slightly attenuated form.The methods proposed in this study and the preliminary results of the kinematic response of the contralateral leg open new directions for the investigation of the relative role of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive feedback on gait control, with potential implications for designing novel robot-assisted gait rehabilitation approaches.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Human-Oriented Robotics and Control Lab, School for Engineering of Matter Transport and Energy, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.

ABSTRACT
Sensorimotor control theories propose that the central nervous system exploits expected sensory consequences generated by motor commands for movement planning, as well as online sensory feedback for comparison with expected sensory feedback for monitoring and correcting, if needed, ongoing motor output. In our study, we tested this theoretical framework by quantifying the functional role of expected vs. actual proprioceptive feedback for planning and regulation of gait in humans. We addressed this question by using a novel methodological approach to deliver fast perturbations of the walking surface stiffness, in conjunction with a virtual reality system that provided visual feedback of upcoming changes of surface stiffness. In the "predictable" experimental condition, we asked subjects to learn associating visual feedback of changes in floor stiffness (sand patch) during locomotion to quantify kinematic and kinetic changes in gait prior to and during the gait cycle. In the "unpredictable" experimental condition, we perturbed floor stiffness at unpredictable instances during the gait to characterize the gait-phase dependent strategies in recovering the locomotor cycle. For the "unpredictable" conditions, visual feedback of changes in floor stiffness was absent or inconsistent with tactile and proprioceptive feedback. The investigation of these perturbation-induced effects on contralateral leg kinematics revealed that visual feedback of upcoming changes in floor stiffness allows for both early (preparatory) and late (post-perturbation) changes in leg kinematics. However, when proprioceptive feedback is not available, the early responses in leg kinematics do not occur while the late responses are preserved although in a, slightly attenuated form. The methods proposed in this study and the preliminary results of the kinematic response of the contralateral leg open new directions for the investigation of the relative role of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive feedback on gait control, with potential implications for designing novel robot-assisted gait rehabilitation approaches.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus