Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon-nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies.
Bottom Line: Nonetheless, many models showed qualitative agreement with observed component processes.The results suggest that improved representation of above-ground-below-ground interactions and better constraints on plant stoichiometry are important for a predictive understanding of eCO2 effects.Improved accuracy of soil organic matter inventories is pivotal to reduce uncertainty in the observed C-N budgets.
Affiliation: Biogeochemical Integration Department, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, D-07745, Jena, Germany.Show MeSH
Mentions: Models differed strongly in their initial NPPN response to eCO2 (Fig.6), generally overestimating the observed initial 11 ± 8% increase in NPPN at Duke FACE and underestimating the observed 35 ± 4% increase at ORNL FACE. Although N limitation did not strongly affect GPPN in the first year in most models, there were substantial differences in the first year's response among the models, in particular at ORNL FACE. Two models (CABLE and CLM4) showed an exceptionally low initial response of NPP at both sites (Fig.5). This low response was related to a near-zero response of GPPN (Fig.6a,b). In CLM4, this response resulted from the assumption that plants down-regulate GPP directly when N limited: CO2 fertilization of GPP is calculated in the absence of N limitation, and then reduced using N-limitation scalars if fNup is insufficient to support this amount of productivity. This low response did not happen in other models that followed a similar approach (DAYCENT and ED2.1), because of sufficient initial N supply. Another class of models simulated photosynthesis based on foliar N content (CABLE, GDAY, LPJ-GUESS, OCN, SDGVM, TECO). In these models, N limitation on GPP acts via foliar N concentrations: limited N availability reduces foliage N, which feeds back to limit GPP. This limitation takes time to develop, such that it was absent or weak in the initial response, but with a strong component of down-regulation in the longer term (Fig.6c,d).
Affiliation: Biogeochemical Integration Department, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, D-07745, Jena, Germany.