Limits...
When the going gets tough: the "why" of goal striving matters.

Ntoumanis N, Healy LC, Sedikides C, Duda J, Stewart B, Smith A, Bond J - J Pers (2013)

Bottom Line: In Study 2, 90 British athletes (43 males; M(age)  = 19.63 years, SD(age)  = 1.14) engaged in the same task, but their motivation was primed by asking them to observe a video of an actor describing her or his involvement in an unrelated study.In Study 1, self-reported autonomous goal motives predicted goal persistence via challenge appraisals and task-based coping.In Study 2, primed autonomous (compared to controlled) goal motives predicted greater persistence, positive affect, and future interest for task engagement.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: University of Birmingham.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Ratings of actor's goal motives across priming conditions. All means significantly different at p < .001.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4288988&req=5

fig02: Ratings of actor's goal motives across priming conditions. All means significantly different at p < .001.

Mentions: We removed six participants (one had previous triathlon experience; five indicated suspicion of the prime) from all analyses, leaving data from 84 participants (43 female; Mage = 19.58 years, SDage = 1.12). Three ANOVAs revealed that participants in the three primed groups (27 autonomous, 27 controlled prime, 30 neutral) did not differ in age or in number of hours spent training or cycling per week, F(2, 81) < 1.82, p > .05, partial η2 = .04. Furthermore, a MANOVA showed that the manipulation was successful: Pillai's Δ = .78, F(4, 162) = 26.07, p < .001, partial η2 = .39 (Figure 2). Specifically, participants rated the actor as having stronger autonomous motives in the autonomous prime (M = 6.15, SD = .82) than in the controlled (M = 2.93, SD = .95) and neutral (M = 4.58, SD = 1.32) primes, F(2, 81) = 62.20, p < .001, partial η2 = .60. Conversely, participants rated the actor as having stronger controlled goal motivation in the controlled prime (M = 6.46, SD = .65) than in the autonomous (M = 2.30, SD = 1.16) and neutral (M = 3.80, SD = 1.51) primes, F(2, 81) = 86.79, p < .001, partial η2 = .68. We display these findings in Figure 2.


When the going gets tough: the "why" of goal striving matters.

Ntoumanis N, Healy LC, Sedikides C, Duda J, Stewart B, Smith A, Bond J - J Pers (2013)

Ratings of actor's goal motives across priming conditions. All means significantly different at p < .001.
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4288988&req=5

fig02: Ratings of actor's goal motives across priming conditions. All means significantly different at p < .001.
Mentions: We removed six participants (one had previous triathlon experience; five indicated suspicion of the prime) from all analyses, leaving data from 84 participants (43 female; Mage = 19.58 years, SDage = 1.12). Three ANOVAs revealed that participants in the three primed groups (27 autonomous, 27 controlled prime, 30 neutral) did not differ in age or in number of hours spent training or cycling per week, F(2, 81) < 1.82, p > .05, partial η2 = .04. Furthermore, a MANOVA showed that the manipulation was successful: Pillai's Δ = .78, F(4, 162) = 26.07, p < .001, partial η2 = .39 (Figure 2). Specifically, participants rated the actor as having stronger autonomous motives in the autonomous prime (M = 6.15, SD = .82) than in the controlled (M = 2.93, SD = .95) and neutral (M = 4.58, SD = 1.32) primes, F(2, 81) = 62.20, p < .001, partial η2 = .60. Conversely, participants rated the actor as having stronger controlled goal motivation in the controlled prime (M = 6.46, SD = .65) than in the autonomous (M = 2.30, SD = 1.16) and neutral (M = 3.80, SD = 1.51) primes, F(2, 81) = 86.79, p < .001, partial η2 = .68. We display these findings in Figure 2.

Bottom Line: In Study 2, 90 British athletes (43 males; M(age)  = 19.63 years, SD(age)  = 1.14) engaged in the same task, but their motivation was primed by asking them to observe a video of an actor describing her or his involvement in an unrelated study.In Study 1, self-reported autonomous goal motives predicted goal persistence via challenge appraisals and task-based coping.In Study 2, primed autonomous (compared to controlled) goal motives predicted greater persistence, positive affect, and future interest for task engagement.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: University of Birmingham.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus