Limits...
Quantitative method for the assignment of hinge and shear mechanism in protein domain movements.

Taylor D, Cawley G, Hayward S - Bioinformatics (2014)

Bottom Line: It is shown that overall a relative translation of domains is rare, and that there is no difference between hinge and shear mechanisms in this respect.However, the shear set contains significantly more examples of domains having a relative twisting movement than the hinge set.The angle of rotation is also shown to be a good discriminator between the two mechanisms.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: D'Arcy Thompson Centre for Computational Biology, School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.

Show MeSH

Related in: MedlinePlus

Histograms for rotation angles. (A) no-contact set, (B) hinge set, (C) mixed set, (D) shear set
© Copyright Policy - creative-commons
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4221117&req=5

btu506-F5: Histograms for rotation angles. (A) no-contact set, (B) hinge set, (C) mixed set, (D) shear set

Mentions: Figure 4B shows the rotation angle plotted against the prediction value. One can discern a general trend for the rotation angle to increase with decreasing prediction value, i.e. the motions become more hinge-like. Large rotations occur below a prediction value of 0.45 in the hinge region. Most of the peaks there correspond to the peaks indicated in Figure 4A and also correspond to the ‘Pure new’ class. In fact, nearly 80% of those peaks in hinge are where Nnew is larger than Nmaint, Nexchpart, and Nexchpair. Figure 5 shows histograms for the rotation angles for the four categories. One can immediately see that for shear, rotations do not exceed 25°. For these cases, there is nearly always either predominance in the number of maintained, Nmaint, or the number of exchanged-partner contact changes, Nexchpart, indicating that for a preserved-interface movement the angle of rotation is limited to 25°.Fig. 5.


Quantitative method for the assignment of hinge and shear mechanism in protein domain movements.

Taylor D, Cawley G, Hayward S - Bioinformatics (2014)

Histograms for rotation angles. (A) no-contact set, (B) hinge set, (C) mixed set, (D) shear set
© Copyright Policy - creative-commons
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4221117&req=5

btu506-F5: Histograms for rotation angles. (A) no-contact set, (B) hinge set, (C) mixed set, (D) shear set
Mentions: Figure 4B shows the rotation angle plotted against the prediction value. One can discern a general trend for the rotation angle to increase with decreasing prediction value, i.e. the motions become more hinge-like. Large rotations occur below a prediction value of 0.45 in the hinge region. Most of the peaks there correspond to the peaks indicated in Figure 4A and also correspond to the ‘Pure new’ class. In fact, nearly 80% of those peaks in hinge are where Nnew is larger than Nmaint, Nexchpart, and Nexchpair. Figure 5 shows histograms for the rotation angles for the four categories. One can immediately see that for shear, rotations do not exceed 25°. For these cases, there is nearly always either predominance in the number of maintained, Nmaint, or the number of exchanged-partner contact changes, Nexchpart, indicating that for a preserved-interface movement the angle of rotation is limited to 25°.Fig. 5.

Bottom Line: It is shown that overall a relative translation of domains is rare, and that there is no difference between hinge and shear mechanisms in this respect.However, the shear set contains significantly more examples of domains having a relative twisting movement than the hinge set.The angle of rotation is also shown to be a good discriminator between the two mechanisms.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: D'Arcy Thompson Centre for Computational Biology, School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.

Show MeSH
Related in: MedlinePlus