Limits...
Syntactic flexibility and planning scope: the effect of verb bias on advance planning during sentence recall.

van de Velde M, Meyer AS - Front Psychol (2014)

Bottom Line: In each experiment, 36 speakers produced the verb phrases in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm.These findings highlight the dependency of planning scope during sentence recall on the grammatical properties of the verb and the frequency of post-verbal nouns.Implications for utterance planning in everyday speech are discussed.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Psychology of Language, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, Netherlands ; Max Planck International Research School for Language Sciences Nijmegen, Netherlands.

ABSTRACT
In sentence production, grammatical advance planning scope depends on contextual factors (e.g., time pressure), linguistic factors (e.g., ease of structural processing), and cognitive factors (e.g., production speed). The present study tests the influence of the availability of multiple syntactic alternatives (i.e., syntactic flexibility) on the scope of advance planning during the recall of Dutch dative phrases. We manipulated syntactic flexibility by using verbs with a strong bias or a weak bias toward one structural alternative in sentence frames accepting both verbs (e.g., strong/weak bias: De ober schotelt/serveert de klant de maaltijd [voor] "The waiter dishes out/serves the customer the meal"). To assess lexical planning scope, we varied the frequency of the first post-verbal noun (N1, Experiment 1) or the second post-verbal noun (N2, Experiment 2). In each experiment, 36 speakers produced the verb phrases in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. On each trial, they read a sentence presented one word at a time, performed a short distractor task, and then saw a sentence preamble (e.g., De ober…) which they had to complete to form the presented sentence. Onset latencies were compared using linear mixed effects models. N1 frequency did not produce any effects. N2 frequency only affected sentence onsets in the weak verb bias condition and especially in slow speakers. These findings highlight the dependency of planning scope during sentence recall on the grammatical properties of the verb and the frequency of post-verbal nouns. Implications for utterance planning in everyday speech are discussed.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Proportion of errors as a function of verb bias (strong VB vs. weak VB) and sentence structure (DO vs. PO).
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4202777&req=5

Figure 1: Proportion of errors as a function of verb bias (strong VB vs. weak VB) and sentence structure (DO vs. PO).

Mentions: Speakers’ accuracy in reproducing target sentences with the correct wording and structure was predicted by N1 frequency: speakers were more likely to correctly reproduce a sentence when the first noun had high frequency. Furthermore, there was an interaction between Verb bias and Sentence structure (respectively β = -0.36, SE = 0.14, z = -2.51 and β = -0.70, SE = 0.29, z = -2.44). Figure 1 depicts the interaction: whereas error rates were higher for PO structures with weak bias verbs than strong bias verbs (β = -0.57, SE = 0.20, z = -2.91), there was no effect of verb bias in DO structures (z = 0.59).


Syntactic flexibility and planning scope: the effect of verb bias on advance planning during sentence recall.

van de Velde M, Meyer AS - Front Psychol (2014)

Proportion of errors as a function of verb bias (strong VB vs. weak VB) and sentence structure (DO vs. PO).
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4202777&req=5

Figure 1: Proportion of errors as a function of verb bias (strong VB vs. weak VB) and sentence structure (DO vs. PO).
Mentions: Speakers’ accuracy in reproducing target sentences with the correct wording and structure was predicted by N1 frequency: speakers were more likely to correctly reproduce a sentence when the first noun had high frequency. Furthermore, there was an interaction between Verb bias and Sentence structure (respectively β = -0.36, SE = 0.14, z = -2.51 and β = -0.70, SE = 0.29, z = -2.44). Figure 1 depicts the interaction: whereas error rates were higher for PO structures with weak bias verbs than strong bias verbs (β = -0.57, SE = 0.20, z = -2.91), there was no effect of verb bias in DO structures (z = 0.59).

Bottom Line: In each experiment, 36 speakers produced the verb phrases in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm.These findings highlight the dependency of planning scope during sentence recall on the grammatical properties of the verb and the frequency of post-verbal nouns.Implications for utterance planning in everyday speech are discussed.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Psychology of Language, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, Netherlands ; Max Planck International Research School for Language Sciences Nijmegen, Netherlands.

ABSTRACT
In sentence production, grammatical advance planning scope depends on contextual factors (e.g., time pressure), linguistic factors (e.g., ease of structural processing), and cognitive factors (e.g., production speed). The present study tests the influence of the availability of multiple syntactic alternatives (i.e., syntactic flexibility) on the scope of advance planning during the recall of Dutch dative phrases. We manipulated syntactic flexibility by using verbs with a strong bias or a weak bias toward one structural alternative in sentence frames accepting both verbs (e.g., strong/weak bias: De ober schotelt/serveert de klant de maaltijd [voor] "The waiter dishes out/serves the customer the meal"). To assess lexical planning scope, we varied the frequency of the first post-verbal noun (N1, Experiment 1) or the second post-verbal noun (N2, Experiment 2). In each experiment, 36 speakers produced the verb phrases in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. On each trial, they read a sentence presented one word at a time, performed a short distractor task, and then saw a sentence preamble (e.g., De ober…) which they had to complete to form the presented sentence. Onset latencies were compared using linear mixed effects models. N1 frequency did not produce any effects. N2 frequency only affected sentence onsets in the weak verb bias condition and especially in slow speakers. These findings highlight the dependency of planning scope during sentence recall on the grammatical properties of the verb and the frequency of post-verbal nouns. Implications for utterance planning in everyday speech are discussed.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus