Limits...
A hard tissue cephalometric comparative study between hand tracing and computerized tracing.

Prabhakar R, Rajakumar P, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R, Vikram NR, Reddy A - J Pharm Bioallied Sci (2014)

Bottom Line: The results of this study show that there is no significant difference in the angular and linear measurements recorded.The P values were significant at 0.05 levels for two parameters, Co-A and Co-Gn with the hand-tracing method.This was significant in ANOVA and post-hoc test by Tukey HSD method.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Orthodontics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

ABSTRACT

Aims: To analyze and compare the angular and linear hard tissue cephalometric measurements using hand-tracing and computerized tracings with Nemoceph and Dolphin software systems.

Subjects and methods: A total of 30 cephalograms were randomly chosen for study with the following criteria, cephalograms of patients with good contrast, no distortion, and minimal radiographic artifacts were considered using the digital method (Kodak 8000 C) with 12 angular and nine linear parameters selected for the study. Comparisons were determined by post-hoc test using Tukey HSD method. The N-Par tests were performed using Kruskal-Walli's method.

Statistical analysis used: ANOVA and post-hoc.

Results: The results of this study show that there is no significant difference in the angular and linear measurements recorded. The P values were significant at 0.05 levels for two parameters, Co-A and Co-Gn with the hand-tracing method. This was significant in ANOVA and post-hoc test by Tukey HSD method.

Conclusions: This study of comparison provides support for transition from digital hand to computerized tracing methodology. In fact, digital computerized tracings were easier and less time consuming, with the same reliability irrespective of each method of tracing.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Dolphin software
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4157243&req=5

Figure 3: Dolphin software

Mentions: Figures 1 and 2 show Nemoceph software and Figures 3 and 4 show Dolphin software.


A hard tissue cephalometric comparative study between hand tracing and computerized tracing.

Prabhakar R, Rajakumar P, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R, Vikram NR, Reddy A - J Pharm Bioallied Sci (2014)

Dolphin software
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4157243&req=5

Figure 3: Dolphin software
Mentions: Figures 1 and 2 show Nemoceph software and Figures 3 and 4 show Dolphin software.

Bottom Line: The results of this study show that there is no significant difference in the angular and linear measurements recorded.The P values were significant at 0.05 levels for two parameters, Co-A and Co-Gn with the hand-tracing method.This was significant in ANOVA and post-hoc test by Tukey HSD method.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Orthodontics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

ABSTRACT

Aims: To analyze and compare the angular and linear hard tissue cephalometric measurements using hand-tracing and computerized tracings with Nemoceph and Dolphin software systems.

Subjects and methods: A total of 30 cephalograms were randomly chosen for study with the following criteria, cephalograms of patients with good contrast, no distortion, and minimal radiographic artifacts were considered using the digital method (Kodak 8000 C) with 12 angular and nine linear parameters selected for the study. Comparisons were determined by post-hoc test using Tukey HSD method. The N-Par tests were performed using Kruskal-Walli's method.

Statistical analysis used: ANOVA and post-hoc.

Results: The results of this study show that there is no significant difference in the angular and linear measurements recorded. The P values were significant at 0.05 levels for two parameters, Co-A and Co-Gn with the hand-tracing method. This was significant in ANOVA and post-hoc test by Tukey HSD method.

Conclusions: This study of comparison provides support for transition from digital hand to computerized tracing methodology. In fact, digital computerized tracings were easier and less time consuming, with the same reliability irrespective of each method of tracing.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus