Limits...
Large-scale filament formation inhibits the activity of CTP synthetase.

Barry RM, Bitbol AF, Lorestani A, Charles EJ, Habrian CH, Hansen JM, Li HJ, Baldwin EP, Wingreen NS, Kollman JM, Gitai Z - Elife (2014)

Bottom Line: Structure-guided mutagenesis and mathematical modeling further indicate that coupling activity to polymerization promotes cooperative catalytic regulation.This previously uncharacterized regulatory mechanism is important for cellular function since a mutant that disrupts CtpS polymerization disrupts E. coli growth and metabolic regulation without reducing CTP levels.We propose that regulation by large-scale polymerization enables ultrasensitive control of enzymatic activity while storing an enzyme subpopulation in a conformationally restricted form that is readily activatable.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.

Show MeSH
An expanded description of CtpS assembly.As shown in Figure 1A, tetramer formation from CtpS dimers is favored by a combination of enzyme concentration as well as nucleotide (substrates ATP and UTP or product CTP) and Mg2+ binding. CTP binding and higher enzyme concentration further stimulates reversible formation of inhibited polymeric filaments, which can be disassembled by ATP/UTP.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03638.033
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4126345&req=5

fig9: An expanded description of CtpS assembly.As shown in Figure 1A, tetramer formation from CtpS dimers is favored by a combination of enzyme concentration as well as nucleotide (substrates ATP and UTP or product CTP) and Mg2+ binding. CTP binding and higher enzyme concentration further stimulates reversible formation of inhibited polymeric filaments, which can be disassembled by ATP/UTP.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03638.033

Mentions: The second advantage of employing multiple types of regulation is that each regulatory strategy has distinct kinetics that together enables regulation over a wide range of potential conditions. For example, transcriptional regulation is slow in comparison to regulation by ligand binding. Competitive or allosteric regulation by ligand binding can be cooperative if the enzymes form oligomers, as in the case of hemoglobin (Perutz, 1989). However, the amassed activity of such oligomers is strictly linear with respect to protein concentration. By contrast, our modeling indicates that coupling activity to ligand-induced polymerization is a simple mechanism for promoting cooperativity with respect to protein concentration, while at the same time maintaining cooperativity with respect to ligand binding. An added benefit of polymerization-mediated inhibition is that it enables cells to sequester CtpS in an activity-primed tetramer state such that CtpS can be rapidly reactivated in a manner limited only by enzyme depolymerization (Figure 9). Previous models for enzyme sequestration have relied on the idea of preventing substrate binding (e.g., [Jackson-Fisher et al., 1999; Michaelis and Gitai, 2010]). Here, we propose an alternate mechanism for sequestration where the active sites can readily access substrates but conformational changes required for activity are restricted. While our data are consistent with the model of cooperative regulation by assembly, experimental noise and nonlinearities limit the current ability to measure the extent of that cooperativity, raising the possibility that there are yet more undiscovered features of CtpS regulation. As methods for manipulating and monitoring nucleotide levels become more available, it will also be interesting to determine the kinetics of the various CtpS regulatory mechanisms in vivo.


Large-scale filament formation inhibits the activity of CTP synthetase.

Barry RM, Bitbol AF, Lorestani A, Charles EJ, Habrian CH, Hansen JM, Li HJ, Baldwin EP, Wingreen NS, Kollman JM, Gitai Z - Elife (2014)

An expanded description of CtpS assembly.As shown in Figure 1A, tetramer formation from CtpS dimers is favored by a combination of enzyme concentration as well as nucleotide (substrates ATP and UTP or product CTP) and Mg2+ binding. CTP binding and higher enzyme concentration further stimulates reversible formation of inhibited polymeric filaments, which can be disassembled by ATP/UTP.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03638.033
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4126345&req=5

fig9: An expanded description of CtpS assembly.As shown in Figure 1A, tetramer formation from CtpS dimers is favored by a combination of enzyme concentration as well as nucleotide (substrates ATP and UTP or product CTP) and Mg2+ binding. CTP binding and higher enzyme concentration further stimulates reversible formation of inhibited polymeric filaments, which can be disassembled by ATP/UTP.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03638.033
Mentions: The second advantage of employing multiple types of regulation is that each regulatory strategy has distinct kinetics that together enables regulation over a wide range of potential conditions. For example, transcriptional regulation is slow in comparison to regulation by ligand binding. Competitive or allosteric regulation by ligand binding can be cooperative if the enzymes form oligomers, as in the case of hemoglobin (Perutz, 1989). However, the amassed activity of such oligomers is strictly linear with respect to protein concentration. By contrast, our modeling indicates that coupling activity to ligand-induced polymerization is a simple mechanism for promoting cooperativity with respect to protein concentration, while at the same time maintaining cooperativity with respect to ligand binding. An added benefit of polymerization-mediated inhibition is that it enables cells to sequester CtpS in an activity-primed tetramer state such that CtpS can be rapidly reactivated in a manner limited only by enzyme depolymerization (Figure 9). Previous models for enzyme sequestration have relied on the idea of preventing substrate binding (e.g., [Jackson-Fisher et al., 1999; Michaelis and Gitai, 2010]). Here, we propose an alternate mechanism for sequestration where the active sites can readily access substrates but conformational changes required for activity are restricted. While our data are consistent with the model of cooperative regulation by assembly, experimental noise and nonlinearities limit the current ability to measure the extent of that cooperativity, raising the possibility that there are yet more undiscovered features of CtpS regulation. As methods for manipulating and monitoring nucleotide levels become more available, it will also be interesting to determine the kinetics of the various CtpS regulatory mechanisms in vivo.

Bottom Line: Structure-guided mutagenesis and mathematical modeling further indicate that coupling activity to polymerization promotes cooperative catalytic regulation.This previously uncharacterized regulatory mechanism is important for cellular function since a mutant that disrupts CtpS polymerization disrupts E. coli growth and metabolic regulation without reducing CTP levels.We propose that regulation by large-scale polymerization enables ultrasensitive control of enzymatic activity while storing an enzyme subpopulation in a conformationally restricted form that is readily activatable.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.

Show MeSH