Limits...
Attentional blink is hierarchically modulated by phonological, morphological, semantic and lexical connections between two Chinese characters.

Cao HW, Jin KB, Li CY, Yan HM - PLoS ONE (2014)

Bottom Line: In this study, we employed varying connections between T1 and T2 and examined how these connections modulate the AB effect.We found that the strongest AB was observed when the two Chinese characters were completely unrelated, while the AB was reduced when T1 and T2 were phonologically, orthographically or semantically related and was almost completely eliminated when T1 and T2 were united in a lexical phrase.The order of activation between Chinese characters was identified as follows: (a) lexical phrases, (b) semantic connection, (c) morphological connection, (d) phonological connection and (e) unrelated words.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

ABSTRACT
The ability to identify the second of two targets (T2) is impaired if that target is presented less than ∼500 ms after the first (T1). This transient deficit is known as attentional blink (AB). Previous studies have suggested that the magnitude of the AB effect can be modulated by manipulating the allocation of attentional resources to T1 or T2. However, few experiments have used Chinese characters and words to explore this phenomenon. The existence of lexical, semantic, phonological and morphological connections between Chinese characters has been well established, and understanding these connections may improve our knowledge of reading Chinese. In this study, we employed varying connections between T1 and T2 and examined how these connections modulate the AB effect. We found that the strongest AB was observed when the two Chinese characters were completely unrelated, while the AB was reduced when T1 and T2 were phonologically, orthographically or semantically related and was almost completely eliminated when T1 and T2 were united in a lexical phrase. The order of activation between Chinese characters was identified as follows: (a) lexical phrases, (b) semantic connection, (c) morphological connection, (d) phonological connection and (e) unrelated words.

Show MeSH
Mean accuracy in identifying T1 at all SOAs in five stimulus categories during dual-task paradigm.The error bars represent the standard error.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4125286&req=5

pone-0104626-g003: Mean accuracy in identifying T1 at all SOAs in five stimulus categories during dual-task paradigm.The error bars represent the standard error.

Mentions: Figure 3 shows the accuracy with which the subjects could identify T1 at all SOAs in each of the five stimulus categories. The mean performance under all five conditions was above 90%. A two-variable (Temporal lag × Category) repeated measures ANOVA revealed that there were no significant differences among the categories across SOAs in a subject analysis (F1(4,95) = 1.396, p = 0.241) and an item analysis (F2(4,745) = 1.371, p = 0.243).


Attentional blink is hierarchically modulated by phonological, morphological, semantic and lexical connections between two Chinese characters.

Cao HW, Jin KB, Li CY, Yan HM - PLoS ONE (2014)

Mean accuracy in identifying T1 at all SOAs in five stimulus categories during dual-task paradigm.The error bars represent the standard error.
© Copyright Policy
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4125286&req=5

pone-0104626-g003: Mean accuracy in identifying T1 at all SOAs in five stimulus categories during dual-task paradigm.The error bars represent the standard error.
Mentions: Figure 3 shows the accuracy with which the subjects could identify T1 at all SOAs in each of the five stimulus categories. The mean performance under all five conditions was above 90%. A two-variable (Temporal lag × Category) repeated measures ANOVA revealed that there were no significant differences among the categories across SOAs in a subject analysis (F1(4,95) = 1.396, p = 0.241) and an item analysis (F2(4,745) = 1.371, p = 0.243).

Bottom Line: In this study, we employed varying connections between T1 and T2 and examined how these connections modulate the AB effect.We found that the strongest AB was observed when the two Chinese characters were completely unrelated, while the AB was reduced when T1 and T2 were phonologically, orthographically or semantically related and was almost completely eliminated when T1 and T2 were united in a lexical phrase.The order of activation between Chinese characters was identified as follows: (a) lexical phrases, (b) semantic connection, (c) morphological connection, (d) phonological connection and (e) unrelated words.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

ABSTRACT
The ability to identify the second of two targets (T2) is impaired if that target is presented less than ∼500 ms after the first (T1). This transient deficit is known as attentional blink (AB). Previous studies have suggested that the magnitude of the AB effect can be modulated by manipulating the allocation of attentional resources to T1 or T2. However, few experiments have used Chinese characters and words to explore this phenomenon. The existence of lexical, semantic, phonological and morphological connections between Chinese characters has been well established, and understanding these connections may improve our knowledge of reading Chinese. In this study, we employed varying connections between T1 and T2 and examined how these connections modulate the AB effect. We found that the strongest AB was observed when the two Chinese characters were completely unrelated, while the AB was reduced when T1 and T2 were phonologically, orthographically or semantically related and was almost completely eliminated when T1 and T2 were united in a lexical phrase. The order of activation between Chinese characters was identified as follows: (a) lexical phrases, (b) semantic connection, (c) morphological connection, (d) phonological connection and (e) unrelated words.

Show MeSH