Limits...
Perceptions of chronically ill and healthy consumers about electronic personal health records: a comparative empirical investigation.

Cocosila M, Archer N - BMJ Open (2014)

Bottom Line: Perceived usefulness was the key explanation of the intention to use PHRs for both ill and well people (total effect of 0.601 and 0.565, respectively) followed by security, privacy and trust in PHRs (total effect of 0.377 and 0.479, respectively).Conversely, computer anxiety was perceived as a significant barrier (total effect of -0.327 for ill individuals and -0.212 for well individuals).We found little difference in perceptions of electronic PHRs between chronically ill and well individuals, although self-reporting their health status might have influenced the results.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Faculty of Business, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus

Path coefficients, significance levels and R2 values for the personal health record adoption model (Ill subsample numbers above the line and Well subsample numbers below the line).
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4120338&req=5

BMJOPEN2014005304F2: Path coefficients, significance levels and R2 values for the personal health record adoption model (Ill subsample numbers above the line and Well subsample numbers below the line).

Mentions: Evaluation of the structural model involved running SmartPLS with a bootstrap of 200 re-samples. Results for path coefficients, their significance levels, and the values of R2 are compared in figure 2 for both subsamples.


Perceptions of chronically ill and healthy consumers about electronic personal health records: a comparative empirical investigation.

Cocosila M, Archer N - BMJ Open (2014)

Path coefficients, significance levels and R2 values for the personal health record adoption model (Ill subsample numbers above the line and Well subsample numbers below the line).
© Copyright Policy - open-access
Related In: Results  -  Collection

License
Show All Figures
getmorefigures.php?uid=PMC4120338&req=5

BMJOPEN2014005304F2: Path coefficients, significance levels and R2 values for the personal health record adoption model (Ill subsample numbers above the line and Well subsample numbers below the line).
Mentions: Evaluation of the structural model involved running SmartPLS with a bootstrap of 200 re-samples. Results for path coefficients, their significance levels, and the values of R2 are compared in figure 2 for both subsamples.

Bottom Line: Perceived usefulness was the key explanation of the intention to use PHRs for both ill and well people (total effect of 0.601 and 0.565, respectively) followed by security, privacy and trust in PHRs (total effect of 0.377 and 0.479, respectively).Conversely, computer anxiety was perceived as a significant barrier (total effect of -0.327 for ill individuals and -0.212 for well individuals).We found little difference in perceptions of electronic PHRs between chronically ill and well individuals, although self-reporting their health status might have influenced the results.

View Article: PubMed Central - PubMed

Affiliation: Faculty of Business, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.

No MeSH data available.


Related in: MedlinePlus